Gene
Ther Mol Biol Vol 13, 158-185, 2009
Learning
from Cancer: The adaptive Growth, Wound and Immune Responses
Review Article
Gary Robert Smith1 and Sotiris Missailidis2
1Research
Department, Perses Biosystems Limited, University of Warwick Science Park,
Coventry, CV4 7EZ, UK
2Department
of Chemistry and Analytical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton
Keynes, MK7 6AA
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspodence: Sotiris
Missailidis, Department of Chemistry and Analytical Sciences, Faculty of
Science, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, MK7
6AA; e-mail: s.missailidis@open.ac.uk
Keywords: Cancer, inflammation, immunity,
angiotensin, AT1 receptors, AT1 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, Oxidative Stress, Hypoxia, Wound, Growth
Received: 2
February 2009; Revised: 25 February 2009
Accepted: 22
May 2009; electronically published: 5 June 2009
The life cycle of cancer, and solid tumours in particular,
can be usefully simplified into two phases of the disease; the earlier phase
where change in intracellular processes is required for carcinogenesis and the
later phase, malignancy, where the continued development of the cancer relies
on the support of extra-cellular processes. From this systems view of cancer
and the failure modes of healthy biological processes associated with it, a
three-vector portrayal of cellular dynamics is abstracted. This overarching
framework for the direction of biosystem responses places the categorisation of
disease at the extreme points of these vectors and provides an explanation for
their cause. Furthermore, laboratory and clinical evidence suggests that a
synergistic systems approach to disease management, based on the manipulation
of these vectors, could lead to new paradigms in treatment.
In
1900, Lord Kelvin famously stated, "There is nothing new to be discovered
in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement."
Whilst the accumulation of knowledge can benefit from a reductionist approach,
to provide insight into system component behaviour, being able to consider the
“big picture” remains of vital importance. This ability to step back
objectively from the detail is restricted or even prevented by “established
wisdom”, and, as a result, great leaps in understanding are sometimes achieved
through unexpected sources and events. Five years after Lord Kelvin’s
statement, Albert Einstein published his paper on special relativity, which
challenged the very simple set of rules laid down by Newtonian mechanics that
had been used to describe force and motion for over two hundred years. One
could argue that all that Einstein had done was to provide a new way of looking
at established data, but the legacy of Einstein’s thinking has revolutionised
our world.
In
1970, T. S. Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, argued that
scientists work by creating a comprehensive "paradigm". He stated
that one of the first signs that a paradigm is shifting is the discovery of
facts that seem significant and indisputably true, but cannot be explained by
the current model (Kaufman, 1987). One such
case is the puzzling role of inflammation: Inflammation is regarded as a key
component of the immune system, which ensures that tissues of the body are free
of invading organisms and pathogens. When an area is infected, it becomes red,
swollen, hot and painful. Another function of inflammation is to support the
healing process, by removing cells that have been damaged through injury or by
infection. In disease conditions, it is thought that the immune system
malfunctions and, instead of attacking invaders and destroying damaged tissue,
inflammation starts to destroy healthy tissue, causing biological dysfunction,
immune suppression and ultimately death. Chronic inflammation is a critical
feature of most diseases; and regardless of the underlying cause, it is the
chronic inflammation that ultimately does the damage. There are limited options
for treating chronic inflammation; these include Steroids, Non Steroid
Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatoid Drugs
(DMARDs). Furthermore, Steroids and DMARDs in particular have side effects and
mechanisms of action that are not completely understood.
In
the developed countries, cancer is becoming the top killer, outpacing the
circulatory diseases that cause strokes and heart attacks. One reason for this
is the understanding of the importance of “bad” cholesterol and the
establishment of statin drugs to treat it. Clinical studies and epidemiological
data have additionally led many to suggest that statins (Health News, 2008; Shafiq et al, 2005; John Hopkins Medical
Letters, 2002), like aspirin before them, may be wonder drugs with
benefits perceived in many diseases (cancer, infections, degenerative disorders
etc). The mechanisms, once again, are not currently fully understood or
accepted, however, an anti-inflammatory link in both cases has been proposed (Athyros et al., 2009; Villard and Mach, 2002).
Despite
a substantial methodological revolution, the discovery of the human genome and
the ascendancy of advanced techniques in bioinformatics, the rate of
introduction of new drugs into the market continues to decline steadily since
the mid 1980s. Much of modern drug discovery starts at basic chemistry,
described as “lead finding” and is the identification of molecules that have
the potential to interfere with biochemical processes. The depth of this
targeting has now reached the genetic code itself and to the intricate details
of interaction that would be unobtainable without these emerging genetic
techniques, the vast majority of drug targeting being now within the circuitry
of the cell itself. Certainly the
low productivity in new drugs is not limited by finance or lack of market, as
budgets and research intensity have increased 30-fold since the 1970s (Cuatrecasas, 2006). Falling productivity has been
blamed on factors such as increased regulatory hurdles and high attrition of
drug candidates. At the heart of the problem, however, might be the more
profound underlying business and management dynamics that reinforce a silo
approach in research and development. An example of the encouragement of this
reductionist approach to research can be seen in cancer. Cancer is no longer
considered from a research perspective as a systemic disease, but instead those
who fund, research and investigate it specialise in a particular type, for
instance lung or breast cancer. It seems also that the majority of effort
delves deep into the genetics of the cell in an attempt to put right, that
which has gone wrong.
There
is a sound logic behind this specialisation, as the scientific method employed
in trials and the need to standardise the patients being treated as much as is
practically possible supports statistical analysis. The downside to this, of
course, is that the encouragement of specialisation inadvertently discourages a
systems approach.
“There
are more than 200 types of cancer, each with different causes, symptoms and treatments.”
– Cancer Research UK.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/incidence/?a=5441
The
purpose of this paper has intent in some way to offer a different view of cancer
and its potential treatments.
In
malignant disease there is still little effective treatment for metastatic
cancer once all known options, cytotoxic agents, radiotherapy, hormone therapy,
cysteine and monoclonal antibodies (dependent on tumour type), for limiting
disease are exhausted (Dolle et al, 2006). Despite
significant investment in new targeting agents such as Vascular Endothelium
Growth Factor (VEGF) inhibitors, Growth Receptor Blockers and immune boosting
agents such as vaccines, only marginal benefits have so far been realised. The
focus for patients then turns to palliative care with, unfortunately, no
realistic hope of recovery. In the 'Hallmarks of Cancer', the authoritative
work by (Hanahan and Weinberg 2000), a new
approach was described that analysed the evolutionary-acquired capabilities
necessary for cancer cells to become life-threatening tumours. Figure 1,
adapted from ‘Hallmarks of Cancer’ below, highlights (in red) some of those
common defects in growth, anti-growth and death controls that are necessary for
normal cells to become cancerous and tumours to form.
Inflammation
has strong links with Cancer in promoting these changes in cells, increasing
the risk of genetic damage. Inflammation from infection, injury and stress or
aggravators, such as smoking or asbestos, is known to create cancers and is
recognized in the literature (Anand et al, 2008; Azad
et al, 2008; Munteanu and Didilescu, 2007; Brody and Spira, 2006; Smith et al,
2006). The most compelling case
for the use of NSAIDs as a preventative regimen is shown in colorectal cancers,
where a recent large cohort study (Jacobs et al, 2007)
of cancer incidence populations, among whom colorectal, prostate, and breast
cancers are common, indicates that long-term daily use of adult-strength
aspirin is associated with modestly reduced overall cancer incidence. The US
Preventative Services Task Force in their recommendation statement (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2007) regarding routine
aspirin or NSAIDs for the primary prevention of colorectal cancer, concluded
that aspirin appears to be effective
at reducing the incidence of colonic adenoma and colorectal cancer, especially
if used in high doses for more than 10 years. However, considering the possible
harms of such a practice, on balance, the benefits do not appear, as yet,
significant enough. In a subsequent study of aspirin-associated
reduction in colorectal cancer, risk protection appeared to be limited to
COX-2–expressing cancers (Chan et al, 2007)
and wider understanding of the role of inflammation in cancer suggests that
this study actually identifies a potential subset of patients who would benefit
from NSAIDs as a treatment. Furthermore, it is now
emerging that the role of inflammation in cancer is just as significant, if not
even more so, in the advancement of cancers to metastatic disease (Smith and Missailidis, 2004; Whiteside, 2008; Menke et al,
2008; Dalgleish and O’Byrne, 2006). This would seem to occur because
once cancer cells evolve to ignore programmed cell death, the uncontrolled
proliferation of cells causes a micro-environmental stress that provokes an
inflammatory response (Sica et al, 2008; Witeside,
2006; Lee et al, 2008). The resultant influx of inflammatory cells (Sica et al, 2008) and immune cells (Whiteside, 2006) into the microenvironment is
ineffective against the cancer, due to its cells having developed resistance to
death signals. The inflammation,
instead, exerts its effect on the healthy tissue and promotes many essential
environmental support processes, necessary for the cancer to flourish and
disseminate (Lee et al, 2008; Peebles et al, 2007):
·
Apoptosis (programmed cell
death) of the surrounding normal cells (Drakopanagiotakis
et al, 2008).
·
Angiogenesis (growth of new
blood vessels in an attempt to relieve oxygen deprivation) (Kundu and Surh, 2008).
·
Invasion, through a breaking
down of the extra cellular matrix and increased cell motility (Marastoni et al, 2008).
·
Progressive immune
suppression as the inflammation becomes chronic and systemic (Whiteside, 2008).
·
Metastasis, through the
release of cancerous cells into the bloodstream of the immune suppressed
organism.

Figure 1:
The key control signals which ensure that normal cells are maintained in
homeostasis with their environment are presented. The figure also highlights some of the common genetic
changes that have to occur for cells to circumvent these controls and for
carcinogenesis to occur.
This is reflected in a direct relationship between systemic and chronic
inflammation and patient mortality (Erlinger et al,
2004; Shankar et al, 2006; Taranova et al, 2008). Indeed it has been
proposed that the reversal of these processes by improving the microenvironment
would provide a new therapeutic approach (Smith and
Missailidis, 2004; Ingber, 2008). A number
of studies support, directly or indirectly the proposed hypothesis. The
establishment of the link between chronic inflammation and cancer has result
some great therapeutic successes, as is the case with Helicobacter Pylori in
its evasion of the immune system and progression in peptic ulcer disease, for
which Marshall and Warren were awarded the 2005 Nobel Prize http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2005/press.html.
Furthermore, the invasiveness and immune suppression of many cancers appears
dependent on induced chronic inflammation. Work by Slaviero
et al (2003) suggests that the effectiveness of conventional drug
treatments is impeded by the inflammatory response. Thus, strategies to resolve
cancer induced inflammation and wounding must form a vital component in
therapy. This has been tested in various clinical trials so far, both as
preventatives and as curative strategies, with more planned for 2009.
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) over expression is seen in many malignancies,
including lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, oesophageal and pancreatic
cancer, which has led to growing interest in the therapeutic potential of
NSAIDs (and more recently specific PGE2 inhibitors) as an adjunct to
existing radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Mann et al,
2005). Furthermore, Ferrari et al (2006) have reported that Gemcitabine, in
combination with celecoxib, during a Phase II trial showed low toxicity, good
clinical benefit rate and good disease control. Reckamp et al reported that
Erlotinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in combination with celecoxib,
during a Phase I trial (Reckamp et al, 2006),
demonstrated objective responses with an acceptable toxicity profile in
non–small cell lung cancer. In the Altorki et al
(2003) phase II trial, the patients were treated with two preoperative
cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin, as well as daily celecoxib, followed by
surgical resection. The results suggested that the addition of a selective
COX-2 inhibitor enhanced the response to preoperative paclitaxel and
carboplatin in patients with NSCLC, although Lilenbaum
et al (2006) report that the addition of celecoxib failed to deliver any
additional benefits when combined with Docetaxel/Irinotecan or
Gemcitabine/Irinotecan during a phase II trial in the Second-Line Treatment of
Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. In a study of 586 patients with prostate
cancer who have had radiotherapy (Khor et al, 2007),
an association of COX-2 expression with patient outcome was found. The
association of increasing COX-2 expression with biochemical failure, distant
metastasis, and failure in treatment, also suggests that COX-2 inhibitors might
improve patient response to radiotherapy.
Another principal mediator of inflammation, tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha
(TNF-a), is also under investigation and early clinical results using TNF-a
blockers are encouraging in advanced cancer, showing some improvement in
disease stability (Brown et al, 2008; Harrison et al,
2007).
The importance of the relationship between inflammation and mortality
has also led to the development of the “Glasgow prognosis score” GPS. The GPS
(derived from an elevated C-reactive protein concentration and hypoalbuminaemia)
has been validated and evaluated as an independent factor in more than 1,000
patients with a variety of advanced cancers including lung (Forrest et al, 2004), gastro-oesophageal (Deans et al, 2009; Sharma et al, 2008; Kobayashi et al, 2008),
pancreatic, colorectal (Neal et al, 2009; Sharma et
al, 2008), breast, ovarian (Sharma et al, 2008)
and renal cancers. Due to its
success in evaluating risk of cancer progression and survival, it is now
becoming widely adopted in the routine assessment and stratification of
patients with advanced cancer.
Surprisingly, however, perhaps the best hope for the treatment of
metastatic cancer is with an existing drug whose potent pleiotropic
anti-inflammatory properties are only just becoming more widely recognized (Hunyady and Catt, 2006).
Angiotensin
II (Ang II) is a peptide hormone within the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS),
overviewed in Figure , generated
from the precursor protein angiotensinogen, by the actions of renin-angiotensin
converting enzyme, chymases and various carboxy- and amino-peptidases.
The
RAS plays a part in maintaining blood pressure, water and electrolyte
homeostasis, and drugs have been developed to manipulate this system and lower
blood pressure in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin
Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors, now in widespread use, block the production
of Ang II, though in some cases they cause coughing due to activated
Bradykinin. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers were specifically developed to avoid
this side effect by blocking the Ang II Type 1 receptor (AT1), highlighted in Figure .
In
humans, insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
gene, which affect the efficiency of the enzyme in cleaving Angiotensin I, have
been found to have an important influence on the progression of cancers and
other diseases (Moskowitz and Johnson, 2004). The
Deletion/Deletion (DD) phenotype, which is the most efficient in producing Ang
II, has been noted to increase invasion, metastasis and decrease survival in a
variety of solid tumours in comparison to Insertion/Deletion (I/D) and
Insertion/Insertion (II) phenotypes: gastric (Rocken
et al, 2007), oral (Vairaktaris et al, 2007), prostrate (Yigit et al, 2007), NSCLC, colorectal (Rocken
et al, 2007) and breast cancer (Yaren et al, 2007). Furthermore, in a recent
study of 172 advanced cancer patients (NSCLC and gastrointestinal) a positive
correlation between white blood cell count, CRP, ACE concentration and ACE
phenotype (DD>ID>II) has been found (Vigano et
al, 2009).

Figure 2: An overview of
the classically defined Renin Angiotensin System

Figure 3: Schematic
outline of the local angiotensin system. Angiotensin I (Ang I) is cleaved by
ACE into Ang II (Ang II), which then binds to angiotensin receptor type 1
(AT1R) and type 2 (AT2R).
A. AT1 receptor expression in Gastric Cancer patients
In
100 patients, the combination of AT1 expression in tumour epithelial cells and
ACE gene polymorphism, directly correlated with nodal spread and decreased
patient survival (Rocken et al, 2007). Figure ,
below, shows the Keplan-Meier survival curve for this patient population, where
patients with AT1 expression had no survival beyond 4 years and those lacking
AT1 expression approached 60% survival at 7 years.

Figure 4:
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the presence (positive) or absence (negative)
of AT1R in gastric cancer cells. Patients with AT1R+ gastric cancer cells had
significantly shorter survival times than patients with AT1R– tumour
cells.
B. AT1 receptor expression in Ovarian cancer patients
In
the tissue of 67 ovarian cancer patients, AT1 receptors were found in 85% of
the cases examined, and 55% were strongly positive (Ino
et al, 2006). In patients who had positive tissue staining for AT1, the
overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly poor (P =
0.041 and 0.017, respectively) as compared to those in patients who had
negative staining for AT1. Overall five-year survival of patients (Chart A
below) with negative expression AT1 (-) was 100% (n=10), AT1 (+) (positive
expression) 45.8% (n=18) and AT1 (++) (very strong expression) 55.7% (n=30).
Tumour progression in the five-year period had associated simultaneous VEGF (Figure
,
Chart D) and AT1 expression (Figure
,
Charts A&B) measured by immunohistochemical staining of the ovarian cancer
tissue. ACE polymorphisms were not considered in this study.


Figure 5:
Overall survival and
progression-free survival of 67 ovarian cancer patients over a five-year study
with respect to AT1 and VEGF expression
C. AT1 receptor expression in Cervical cancer patients
Expression
of AT1 receptor in normal and neoplastic tissues was measured by
immunohistochemistry by Kikkara et al in their study of Cervical cancer
patients (Kikkawa et al, 2004). Mean staining
intensity level was stronger in invasive carcinoma cells than in normal
dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ
tissues. Ang II induced the secretion of VEGF from Siha cells and promoted
their invasive potential.
Laio
et al (Liao et al, 2007) have also obtained
similar conclusions to Kikkara et al (2004), in
another study, where the clinical significance of AT1 was investigated in
cervical cancer progression. AT1 mRNA expression was examined by quantitative
reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in
paraffin-embedded tissues from 35
cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma, 15 cases of cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia, and 15 cases of normal cervix.
The rate of AT1 expression mRNA was 77.1%, 40.0% and 0, respectively, in
squamous cell carcinomas, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and normal cervical
tissues, while their mRNA quantities were 0.3863 +/- 0.041, 0.0768 +/- 0.035
and 0, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between
them (P < 0.01). The average staining intensity of AT1 protein was found to
be stronger in invasive carcinoma cells than that in dysplasia tissues and
normal ones (P < 0.01).
D. AT1 receptor expression in Brain cancer patients
In
133 tumours from patients with astrocytoma (Arrieta et
al, 2008), 10% of low-grade astrocytomas were found to be positive for
AT1, whereas grade III and IV astrocytomas were positive in 67% (P<0.001).
AT1-positive tumours showed higher cellular proliferation and vascular density
and had a lower survival rate than those with AT1-negative (P<0.001).
Patients with AT1 receptor positive had less survival compared to the negative
ones, 9.5 months versus 16.5 months.
AT1 expression also correlated with increased expression of VEGF and PDGF.
E. AT1 receptor expression in Pancreatic cancer patients
In
19 of the 25-neoplastic tissues examined in patients (approximately 75%), ACE
and AT1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly upregulated when compared to
healthy tissue (Shibata et al, 2005).
ACE/AT1-negative tumours were found in only 2 cases (8%). VEGF expression was
significantly higher in the tissues that expressed high levels of AT1 and ACE
and these were co-localized in the malignant ducts and the surrounding tissue.
F. AT1 receptor expression in Endometrial cancer patients
In
94 cases, a positive correlation between Ang II expression and surgical stage
(p = 0.01) was found (Shibata et al, 2005). Of
the 94 cases, 56 (59.6%) expressed AT1 and 73 (77.7%) VEGF. The presence of Ang
II and AT1 expression was associated with a significantly poorer prognosis.
G. Mouse model confirms the role of both
host and tumour derived AT1 in the progression of disease
Using
a mouse model of Lewis lung carcinoma (a mouse derived experimental
transportable lung carcinoma also known as 3LL or LLC) (Imai et al, 2007), the study concluded that the growth of the
cancer in mice lacking AT1 was significantly impaired in comparison to
wild-type mice and that associated VEGF expression and angiogenesis was
reduced. In the AT1 knock out mice (those that lacked the genes for AT1),
tumour derived AT1 expression (the tumour still having the genes for AT1) still
occurred, although to a lesser degree, and administration of Candesartan showed
further reductions of tumour growth.
The
key message from this study is that AT1 derived, both in the surrounding host
tissue and in the cancer cells, is important for the progression of the tumour.
H. ACE Inhibitor reduces tumour growth in a mouse
model
In
another mouse model using implanted cancer forming LNM35 human lung cells (Attoub et al, 2008), treatment with ACE Inhibitor
Captopril (2.8 mg/mouse) for 3 weeks resulted in a remarkable reduction of
tumour growth (58%, P < 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (50%, P= 0.088).
There were no undesirable effects of Captopril treatment on animal behaviour
and body weight.
I. Candesartan dramatically reduces cancer metastasis
in a mouse model
The
protective effects of Candesartan, an AT1 antagonist, (10 mg/kg) in a 16-day
mouse renal cancer lung metastasis model have been demonstrated by Miyajima et al
(2002). In the model, metastases to the lung showed prominent AT1
expression and Candesartan treatment dramatically prevented the formation of
additional nodules (14.9 ± 1.8; P < 0.0001; n = 12) compared with control
metastatic mice (123.3 ± 8.6; n = 13). It was noted that the use of Candesartan
also resulted in the inhibition of VEGF expression and neovascularization.
The
question that then arises is why should manipulation of the Angiotensin system
have such a profound effect on the progression of tumours. If one was to
consider that the mechanism might be anti-inflammatory, then the answer
suggests that blockade of AT1 leads to a fundamental change in the mechanism of
the disease and not merely tinkering with one component.
In
‘Atherosclerosis - an inflammatory disease’ the seminal work by Russell Ross
that explained an injury response as the cause of this disease, he also
explained that the cellular interactions in atherogenesis are fundamentally no
different from those in chronic inflammatory fibroproliferative diseases such
as cirrhosis, rheumatoid arthritis, glomerulosclerosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and
chronic pancreatitis (Ross, 1999). Additionally
Ross et al in their review of atherosclerosis and cancer suggest that there are
common molecular pathways of disease development and progression in these
diseases (Ross et al, 2001). They conclude that
a series of molecular pathways of disease development and progression are also
common to atherosclerosis and cancer; that the world's two most common diseases
are far more closely aligned than previously believed and that emerging
anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative therapeutic strategies may ultimately
be efficacious in both conditions.
The
role and benefits of Angiotensin Receptor Blockade in the treatment of
Cardiovascular disease and Atherosclerosis is now widely accepted. Furthermore,
the mechanism of not just how, but also, more importantly, why is now
understood.
TGF-beta,
a powerful cytokine commonly found in blood plasma, has important regulation,
inflammation, healing and repair functions. The ability of TGF-Beta to suppress
carcinogenesis is recognised to be of great importance; however, tumour cells
do ultimately evolve to avoid its growth inhibitory and apoptotic effects. Malignant
tumours themselves express TGF-beta to their advantage, promoting angiogenesis,
the remodelling and destruction of surrounding healthy tissue, and also immune
suppression. Efforts through journal literature review to discover the means by
which cancers are able to generate TGF-beta, allowed the authors to conclude
that it was in fact through increased extracellular presentation of Angiotensin
II Type 1 receptor (Smith and Missailidis, 2004). AT1
expression is an endemic reaction by all cells that are under stress: hypoxia (Krick et al, 2005), sheer stress (Yasuda et al, 2008; Hitomi et al, 2006; Delli et al, 2008)
and oxidative stress via oxidized LDL acting on the LOX-1 receptor (Watanabe et al, 2001; Li et al, 1999; Kickenig et al, 1997;
Hu et al, 2008). The expression and activation of AT1 receptors is thus
coordinating a stress (or injury/wound) response (
Figure 6)
(Smith, 2008).
In
addition to the mediators reviewed by Smith and
Missailidis (2004) and Suzuki et al (2003), a full spectrum of important
molecules involved in the cellular response to stress are induced by the AT1
receptor (Figure
).
These include the pro-inflammatory mediators Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1b), tumour
Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2), in addition to many other agents that promote the influx and migration
of immune and inflammatory cells, the growth of new blood vessels (notably
VEGF) and tissue remodelling (notably Matrix Metalloproteinases and Transforming
Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-B)).
With
the role of AT1 in cancer and cardiovascular disease established, when the
literature of other diseases is reviewed, it is reasonable to anticipate that
the role of this receptor is system-wide with regard to chronic inflammation
and injury. Fortunately, interest in the wider implications of the AT1 receptor
within disease is increasing and these studies together, summarised in Table 1,
further substantiate its systemic role.
Searches
across the literature for ACE gene polymorphisms also substantiate this
relationship with disease and injury, with a positive correlation found in
Alzheimer’s disease (Yand and Liu, 2008),
Rheumatoid Arthritis (Uppal et al, 2007), Parkinson’s
(Lin et al, 2002),
Tuberculosis (Ogarkov et al, 2008), Lupus (Rabbani et al, 2008), Sarcoidosis (Tahir et al, 2007), COPD (Busquets
et al, 2007), Asthma (Gao et al, 2000),
Ulcerative colitis (but not Crohn’s) (Saibeni et al,
2007), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) (Vladutiu and Natelson, 2004),
Depression (Bondy et al, 2005),
suicidal behaviours (Sparks et al, 2009),
late respiratory complications of mustard gas exposure (Hosseini-Khalili et al, 2008), long
term effects of radiation poisoning (Kehoe
et al, 2009), and
Type II Diabetes (Ramachandran et al, 2008).
Some inflammatory diseases, such as Crohn’s, appear neutral with respect to ACE
polymorphism. However, this may be due to the presence and activity of the AT2
receptor or wider aspects of the Angiotensin System that still require further
exploration (such as the ACE2 and Ang pathways (Kaufman, 1987; Health News, 2008; Shafiq et al, 2005; Hohn Hopkins
Medical Letters, 2002; Athyros et al, 2009; Veillard and Mach, 2002;
Cuatrecasas et al, 2006).

Figure 6: AT1
expression is upregulated in tissue stress and injury by the action of Oxidised
LDL on scavenger receptors, such as the Lectin-Like Oxidised LDL receptor
intracellular hypoxia sensing mechanisms, such as HIF-alpha, and mechanical and
physical cellular stress.

Figure 7:
The involvement of not just the cancer cells, but also those normal cells
co-opted to support cancer progression in producing and releasing a full
spectrum of ‘stress and wound response’ mediators is presented.
Table
1:
Overview of the diseases in which expression of AT1 is known to be significant.
Those markers of the disease affected by AT1 expression are also noted.
|
Organ/Disease |
Mediators
inhibited by AT1 blockade |
Reference
|
|
Kidney disease |
COX-2, 12-lipooxygenase, MCP-1, and PAI-1, activation of
NFKβ, VEGF |
Franscini et al, 2002; Vaziri et al, 2007; Esteban et al,
2006; Kitayama et al, 2006; Janiak et al, 2006 |
|
Pancreatitis |
(Key markers of the disease, including IL-6 |
Tsang et al, 2004a; Tsang et al, 2004b; Chan and
Leung, 2009 |
|
Type 2 diabetes |
NAD(P)H oxidase and increased oxidative stress in islets
of Type 2 diabetes |
Nakayama et al, 2005 |
|
Liver
fibrosis and cirrhosis |
TNF-alpha, IL-6 and TGF-beta, NFKβ |
Yoshiji et al, 2009; Oakley et al, 2009; Iwata et al,
2008; Debernardi-Venon et al, 2007; Ikura et al, 2005; Toblli et al, 2008 |
|
Skin |
None noted in these studies. |
Abiko et al, 1996; Steckelings et al, 2004 |
|
Eye, Uveitis,
diabetic retinopathy |
TNF-alpha, MCP-1 and ICAM-1. |
Miyazaki et al, 2008; Nagai et al, 2005; Nakamura et al,
2005 |
|
Alzheimer’s,
Huntington’s and Parkinson’s |
None noted in these studies. |
Ge and Barnes, 1996 |
|
Alzheimer’s,
|
None noted in these studies. |
Ozacmak et al, 2007; Savaskan et al, 2001; Gard, 2004 |
|
Parkinson’s |
NAPDH Oxidase, microglial activation |
Joglar et al, 2009;
Rodriguez-Pallares et al, 2008; Grammatopoulos et al, 2007 |
|
Mesial
temporal sclerosis |
None noted in this study. |
Arganaraz et al, 2008 |
|
Muscle
and Muscular dystrophy |
TGF- β |
Sun et al, 2009; Bedair et al, 2008; |
|
Lung
Diseases |
TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-1beta |
Shen et al, 2008; Chen et al, 2007; Bullock et
al, 2001 |
|
Preeclampsia |
None noted in these studies. |
Irani and Xia, 2008; Xia et al,
2007 |
|
Adrenal
Gland |
LPS-induced aldosterone, COX-2 and IL-6 |
Sanchez-Lemus et al, 2008 |
|
Stomach
(gastric ulcers) |
‘antiinflammatory response’ |
Laudanno and Cesolari, 2006 |
|
Marfan
syndrome |
TGF-beta |
Habshi et al, 2006 |
|
Alcoholism |
Reduced alcohol intake |
Maul et al, 2005 |
|
Bone,
haematopoiesis |
Arachidonic acid release and MCSF by bone marrow stromal
cells |
Richmond et al, 2004 |
|
Colitis |
‘Protects against potent ischemia/reperfusion induced
pro-inflammatory effects in the colonic microcirculation |
Riaz et al, 2004 |
Inflammation
has long been considered a vital defence against invaders and attempts have
been made to understand how and why this process becomes self-destructive in
disease processes. The ‘Chronic
Inflammation and Angiotensin model’, serves as a useful tool to understand the
perceived contradictory nature of inflammation and perhaps suggests why certain
‘overactive immune responses’, characterised by chronic inflammation, could be
viewed more appropriately as destruction of the body by the infection, rather
than destruction of the infection by the body (Meduri,
2002; Kuhn and Ghannoum, 2003; Lalani et al, 2000; Menaker and Jones, 2003;
Nicod et al, 2001). Acceptance of the Injury/Wound Response mechanism as
distinct from the Immune Response may provide a possible explanation, since, if
cancer is able to generate immune suppression through injury and wounding, then
it would seem likely that other invaders or diseases are doing the same. The
implication being that Injury/Wound responses act against effective immune
responses, and that these processes may therefore be diametrically opposed.
The
supposition that cells may have dimensional behaviour is not new. Diseases are
often considered in terms of a TH1/TH2 imbalance and although this model has
since been found to have limitations, it has provided a framework for disease
treatment strategy and discussion. Ibragimov et al
(2005), describe a mathematical model of atherogenesis as an
inflammatory response and more recently, computer modelling has been used as a
tool to determine how signal transduction pathways control cellular responses
to stimuli. The model derived two groupings of intracellular signals that
constitute fundamental dimensions (molecular "basis axes") within the
apoptotic-signalling network (Janes et al, 2005).
Initial speculation by the authors that cells may have additional dimensional
behaviour, beyond the Injury and Immune Responses, led to the consideration of
a third candidate: a Growth response and later a central Innate response. A
hypothetical model has thus been developed based on the founding principle that
cells can change their behaviour in order to respond to changes in their
environment. Cells are, however, only able to carry out any one response
effectively at a time, such that efforts towards any one will detract from their
ability towards the others. The most critical factors in the influence of cell
response are considered in this paper and candidates, those that seem currently
most likely based on analysis of the available literature, identified as key
controlling factors. Three types of factors have been considered, firstly those
providing the force or key-driver behind the responses, secondly an
accelerator, an agent that directs or speeds up the effect, and lastly a brake,
an agent whose role is to regulate the effect. Of course there are many other
influencers and supporters of these processes that have their own pleiotropic
roles that help to guide and provide feedback. However, what has been attempted
here is to identify candidates for the absolute essential core for modelling
this process. Despite its simplicity, the resultant model, which is an
overarching framework for describing cellular responses, places diseases at the
extremes of these responses and provides a useful tool that is capable of
predicting disease aetiology and also new possibilities for treatment through
the manipulation of the candidate drivers, accelerators and brakes identified.
In
consideration of the model, the innate response is placed at the centre and
represents the starting point for responses by cells in homeostasis. In this
state, cells will monitor their environment through cell-mediated signalling
such as Toll-Like receptors
(TLR) and Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) recognition. MHC proteins
supporting antigen presentation on cell's surfaces and TLRs established for early recognition of
Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns. TLRs have been described as the link
between innate and adaptive immunity (Pasare and
Medzhitov, 2005). However, evidence now supports a broader role for TLR
in the recognition and repair of cell damage induced by heat-shock and wounding
(Kluwe et al, 2009; Anders et al, 2004; Maung et al,
2005; Jiang et al, 2005; Paterson et al, 2003; Schwacha and Daniel, 2008;
Cairns et al, 2008; Breslin et al, 2008; Mollen et al, 2006). Of note is
that manipulation of TLR has been demonstrated as a means of immune suppression
(Krutzik and Modlin, 2004; Pasare and Medzhitov, 2003;
Wu et al, 2009) and postulated to have a controlling role in moderating
Regulatory T cells (Sutmuller et al, 2007). In the
majority of circumstances, these innate responses (that includes inflammatory
mediators such as TNF-alpha) are adequate to deal with the dangers of invaders
and damage. None the less, in the course of evolution, necessity has led to the
provision of adaptive immune and wound responses.
The
adaptive Wound Response is driven by stresses (including physical, hypoxic and
oxidative) and can be considered to provide the motive force behind the
response. However, the go signal
itself is the AT1 receptor and without the acceleration of the AT1 signal, the
wound response will be undertaken at a sedate pace. Indeed, it is foreseen that
wound healing will still take place, but in the absence of fibrosis, with
complete AT1 blockade. Importantly, it should be noted that although the AT1
receptor promotes TNF-α and COX-2, blockade of the AT1 receptor would not
be expected to completely suppress their expression. TNF- α, for instance,
is expressed through the activation of TLR2/4 as part of a potentially
beneficial innate response (Garay et al, 2007).
As
the brake, the AT2 receptor is the most natural candidate, as in many studies
it has been shown to have antagonistic properties to the AT1 receptor (Heymes and Levy, 1998; Schulman and Raij, 2008).
Regarding AT2, although there has been increased research and interest in its
role, the area still appears little explored. What is known is that, whilst the
AT1 receptor is distributed ubiquitously and abundantly in adult tissues,
expression of the AT2 receptor is high in the foetus but low in adult tissues.
Mounting evidence also indicates that AT2 receptor expression increases in
response to injury, AT1 receptor blocker therapy, and has a significant
modulating effect in the wound healing process (Schulman
and Raij, 2008; Mizoue et al, 2006; Carey, 2005; Steckelings et al, 2005;
Kawajiri et al, 2008).
The
expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors on fibroblasts present in cardiac fibrosis
has been investigated (Tamura et al, 1999).
These types of fibroblast are noted for their expression of both AT1 and AT2
receptors and have been used as the basis of a model to learn more about AT2
expression. In this model, the presence of IL-1b, TNF-α and
lipopolysaccharides, through induction of NO and cGMP, all down-regulate AT2
with no effect on AT1, leading to a quicker progression of fibrosis.
Interestingly, the continuing presence of pro-inflammatory signals served to
delay expression of AT2. This was confirmed in a separate study of AT2
expression in proliferating cells. TGF- β1 and bFGF are shown as powerful
inhibitors of AT2 expression, whilst IGF-1, liberated by activated fibroblasts,
was shown to significantly induce the expression of AT2 (Li et al, 1998).
A
recent review/hypothesis paper from Castellon and Hamdi ‘Demystifying the ACE
polymorphism: from genetics to biology’ (Castellon and
Hamdi, 2007), summarizes the current information on the ACE polymorphism
and explains its function in the context of cell survival. Castellon and Hamdi
also provide a model to understand the role of the ACE enzyme in biology and
disease at the organism and population levels that is not inconsistent with the
response model proposed in this work.
An
analysis of the literature thus suggests that the balance of AT1 and AT2
receptors is important in the coordination of the wound responses and that an
imbalance of these receptors can lead to disease conditions (Figure ).
The
growth response is driven by the presence of IGF-1 and without the presence of
IGF-1 cells will simply not progress normally through the cell cycle. IGF-1
plays a pivotal role in growth, development and repair of normal and diseased
tissue (Joseph D’Ercole and Ye, 2008; Dupont et al,
2003; Giustina et al, 2008). The model proposes that the proliferation
of cells is accelerated and guided by steroid receptors such as glucocorticoid
receptors and sex steroid receptors (Cheskis et al,
2007). The fact that the activities of many of these candidate
accelerators are wider than classically thought is in keeping with this
proposal. Glucocorticoid receptor expression, for instance, has been studied in
foetal lung development (Gnanalingham et al, 2005)
and plays a defining role in tissue development and growth (Seckl and Meaney, 2004). Additionally, Sex Steroid
Receptors have been shown to be important in the health and development of
non-classically associated systems and organs such as cardiovascular, immune,
GI tract liver and skin (Murphy and Korach, 2006;
Pelletier and Ren, 2004; Goldman-Johnson et al, 2008). Sex steroids also
play a part in tissue wound healing (Gilliver et al,
2008; Gilliver et al, 2007), for example in the skin. Androgens retard
repair through the inhibition of re-epithelialization (Gilliver
et al, 2009), whilst Estrogens accelerate it. In contrast, Androgens
have been reported to promote bone repair (Maus et al,
2008) and both Androgen and Estrogen are recognised factors in long term
bone health (Lerner, 2006).
The
premise that tissue repair and embryo development share similar processes has
also been made by Paul Martin and Suas M Parkhurst
(2004) in their review of the parallels between repair and embryo
morphogenesis.
It
is proposed that Retinoic Acid Receptors play the crucial role in signalling
when growth and replication should come to a conclusion. Its broad effects are
seen not just in the control of disease, notably in various cancers, but also
in foetal development (Chytil et al, 1996).
Retinoic Acid has also been found to antagonise the wound recognition
suppression actions of Glucocorticoids (Lee et al,
YEAR) and to down-regulate lung repair processes promoted by IGF-1 (Chetty and Nielsen, 2002). The synergistic inhibitory
effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 with Retinoic acid on the growth of epithelial prostrate
cells was most marked when Hydrocortisone was eliminated (Peehl et al, 1995). A recent review by Wolf suggests
that, in addition to its cell growth inhibition though the Retinoic Acid
Receptor, Retinoic acid can also be a cause of cell proliferation through the
orphan nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Wolf, 2008). This would support the proposal that it
is the receptor and not the ligand that provides the brake in growth.

Figure 8:
Hypothetical representations contrasting the expression of AT1 and AT2
receptors in the course of healthy wound recovery and disease conditions.
The
adaptive immune response is driven by antigen presentation and this process has
been well described (Reis e Sousa, 2004). The
host's cells express "self" antigens. These antigens are different
from those on the surface of bacteria or on the surface of virally infected
host cells or cancer cells.
With
the exception of non-nucleated cells (including erythrocytes), all cells are
capable of presenting antigen and of activating the adaptive response. Some
cells are specially equipped to present antigen, and to prime naive T cells.
Dendritic cells and B-cells (and to a lesser extent macrophages) are equipped
with special immunostimulatory receptors that allow for enhanced activation of
T cells, and are termed professional antigen presenting cells (APC).
A
key step in the adaptive immune response is conditioning or maturing of the
APC, where it develops the ability to communicate the antigen to T Cells in the
lymph nodes. Several T cell
subgroups can be activated by professional APCs, and each type of T cell is
specially equipped to deal with each unique toxin or bacterial and viral
pathogen. The type of T cell activated, and the type of response generated
depends, in part, on the context in which the APC first encountered the
antigen. Many cytokines have pleiotropic properties that steer either the early
(innate) or adaptive (antigen derived) response. Notably, IL-4 is associated
with TH2 phenotype and B cell activity, IFN-a with TH1 and macrophages, IL-17
with TH17 (Iwakura et al, 2008) and IL-12 with
TH0 and CD8. Commonly IL-2 is regarded as having an overarching presence in
supporting immune cell population and function, be they ‘inflammatory’ or
‘regulatory’ (Hoyer et al, 2008), whilst IL-10
is generally seen as having an overarching suppressive role.
Within
this complexity, IL-2 is postulated as the key candidate accelerator of the
Adaptive Immune Response, having a significant effect on the progression of the
Dendritic Cell lifecycle (Granucci et al, 2003),
and IL-10 is proposed as the brake due to its very broad role in regulation (Mocellin et al, 2004; Schneider et al, 2004). Of
particular interest is the relationship between dendritic cells and regulatory
T cells (Mahnke et al, 2007). Only
mature/activated dendritic cells stimulate T cell proliferation, and vice versa,
T Regulatory cells are able to affect dendritic cell development, preventing
maturation and inducing IL-10.
Interestingly, major injury has been reported to induce increased
production of interleukin-10 and decreased levels of IL-2 by cells of the immune
system, with a negative impact on resistance to infection (Lyons et al, 1997; Miller et al, 2007). The majority
of studies also indicate that burn, injury and trauma all reduce the presence
of capable dendritic cells as well as cause immune suppression (Muthy et al, 2008; D’Arpa et al, 2009).
With
this three-dimensional framework in place, the categorisation of diseases at
the extremes of these vectors is now considered.
The
extreme of the wound response lies in the domain of ‘wounds that will not
heal’.
The
type of inflammation associated with cancer-induced wounding is clearly
immunosuppressive and many bacteria, fungal and parasitic infections similarly
promote wounding as a means of immune suppression. Infection is a recognised
risk and progressive factor in cardiovascular disease (Ben-Haim
et al, 2009). Suspicion and speculation has also been long ongoing
regarding infectious components to many diseases whose causes have been
attributed to genetics, failure of the immune system or even psychological
causes on the part of the patient. This model may serve as a more logical
explanation for autoimmune diseases (Toussirot and
Roudier, 2008; Cooke et al, 2008; Pordeus et al, 2008), Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (Lorusso et al,
2009), Autism, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (Boorom,
2007) and neurodegenerative diseases (Arai et
al, 2006; Kamer et al, 2008). The model is suggesting that these
infections have evolved to promote wounding and chronic inflammation in order
to suppress the adaptive immune system. Furthermore, the model would predict
that once the host’s immune system is compromised in this way, the individual
is then susceptible to additional co-infections and cancer.
The
question must then arise, why would biosystems evolve what appears to be a
blind side in the immune system, such that injury switches off adaptive
immunity? The logical answer might be that this compromise has evolved in order
to avoid genuine ‘autoimmune’ reactions during wound clearance and remodelling.
Ageing
is a further promoter of diseases in this domain, as a growing lack of systemic
and locally derived IGF-1 leads to susceptibility to invaders and unresolved
stresses (Martens et al, 2003; Kjaer et al, 2006).
During normal wound healing, local IGF-1 is released to supplement systemic
IGF-1 and generate sufficient AT2 to counteract the activities of AT1. Local
IGF-1 is released from the extra-cellular matrix by macrophages (released by
the activity of Matrix Metalloproteinases) and is also produced locally via
stimulation by activated fibroblasts, monocytes (Todorovic
et al, 2008) and T cells (Toulon et al, 2009).
Notably, in the Toulon et al study, IGF-1 production could not be detected in T
cells isolated from chronic wounds.
Beyond
lessons in the wound response, much more can be learnt from the behaviour of
cancer, in particular, where extremes in growth response can be observed. There are, for instance, many hormone-dependent 'benign' forms of
growth, including those that can later become hormone-independent, and
malignant. The action of IGF-1 and acceleratory steroids, not
only promote the growth of the tumour, but also appear to provide an
alternative means of immune suppression (Castro
Cabezas et al, 1998; Maruo et al, 2004; Muller and von Werder, 1992; Platet et
al, 2004; Sengupta and Wasylyk, 2004; Turney et al, 2004; Giannitrapani et al,
2006). The transition to malignancy through
AT1 expression and wound response is most likely marked by growth of the tumour
beyond the limits of its environment. In addition, the model serves to explain
the increased risk of a cancer becoming malignant, following tissue damage
through surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy (Baum et
al, 2005; Fowble et al, 2001; Kara et al, 2001; Everett et al, 2008; Demicheli
et al, 2007). Baum et al, thus, proposes that breast cancer surgery can
induce angiogenesis and proliferation of distant dormant micrometastases,
especially in young patients with positive nodes.
In the category of chronic Growth Response is also Cushing’s syndrome,
commonly associated as a side effect of steroid use, and notably, in some
cases, caused by tumour-stimulated production of Adrenocorticotropin (Castro Cabezas et al, 1998; Muller and von Werder, 1992;
Turney et al, 2004).
It
would be also logical to expect many viral diseases to be found in this domain,
and this is evident in the scientific literature (Brooke
and Sapolsky, 2000; Congote, 2005; Iwakiri et al, 2005; Katagiri et al, 2006;
Silverman et al, 2005; Sonnex, 1998; Tseng et al, 2005) of the induced
Growth Response promoting viral replication and immune suppression. Lawson et
al also propose that hormone responsive viruses such as Human papillomaviruses,
mouse mammary tumour virus and Epstein-Barr virus may the prime candidate
causes of breast cancer (Lawson et al, 2006).
Many viruses offer an additional risk to carcinogenesis. All viruses (even
those considered benign) have to hijack and promote host cell growth in order
to replicate. Numerous mechanisms
are employed, DNA and RNA sequences are inserted into the host, growth factors
are stimulated and anti-growth factors are suppressed. Viral infections, thus,
increase the risk of cell mutation and population growth, and for these reasons
provide another target of interest for cancer prevention, with some well known
examples shown in Table 2.
In
addition to viral strategies that directly stimulate factors for immune
suppression through the growth response, it is postulated that the chronic
inflammation that arises from liberated viral toxins, particularly when their
host cells are destroyed, is also an evolved mechanism to suppress the adaptive
immune response (thereby protecting future generations of the virus). A review
by Zúñiga MC (2003), ‘Lessons in Détente or
know thy host: The immunomodulatory gene products of myxoma virus’, highlights
that the virus has evolved to stimulate innate responses and apoptosis of
surrounding host cells through the generation of a number of products such as
TNF-alpha.
Table 2:
The marked association between a number of specific cancers and viral
infections is highlighted.

Perhaps
best described as diseases of hypersensitivity and allergy, conditions like
Asthma, COPD and Allergic Rhinitis belong in this domain. These diseases often
feature tissue that contains a preponderance of sensitised Esonophils, Mast
cells and Basophils. Although at the extreme end of chronic immune responses,
IL-4 plays undoubtedly an important role in sustaining disorders in this
area. On reflection, the affected
tissue could again be recognised as wounds that will not heal and that an
exaggerated wound response has become manifest as a result of prolonged stress
(Bullock et al, 2001). The relationship between
asbestos and lung diseases likely falls into this category. Of particular note
is that Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) levels have been reported to
increase in line with increasing levels of inflammation in asbestos workers (Owczarek and Lewczuk, 1991).
The
cause of these allergic diseases is currently explained as genetic
susceptibility and environmental exposures. However, many invaders take
advantage of the benefits of the environment and exacerbate the course of the
disease (Tamari et al, 2009; Murphy, 2006; Sethi,
2006; Pelaia et al, 2006; Pinto Mendes, 2008; Tauro et al, 2008). It is
thus possible that some invaders not only promote, but also actually cause this
state in order to evade innate responses that might otherwise be effective. A
review by Walton RP and Johnston SL, “Role of respiratory viral infections in
the development of atopic conditions”, is one paper that supports this possibility
(Walton and Johnston, 2008), with human
rhinoviruses being shown to be the most prevalent cause of lower respiratory
tract viral infections in infants, along with associated asthma development. Wu
et al, also propose that a delay of exposure or prevention of winter viral
infection during early infancy could prevent asthma (Wu
et al, 2008). Respiratory Syncytial Virus has also been implicated as a
cause of allergic type responses although the mechanism has yet to be defined (Belino-Studzinska and Pancer, 2008). Even the
behaviour of HIV/AIDs has been compared to an allergic disease (Becker, 2004) due to raised levels of IgE and IL-4 in
sera of HIV-1 infected and AIDS patients. Becker further proposes that a
treatment that employs both antivirals and anti-allergen drugs may very well
defeat the AIDS syndrome.
Blackburn and Wherry (2007) in their
review, ‘IL-10, T cell exhaustion and viral persistence’ (Blackburn and Wherry, 2007), highlight the emerging
role that IL10 has in the progression of viral diseases. They explain that
viral infections can have one of two outcomes: control of viral replication and
acute infection or viral persistence and chronic infection and that both
pathogen and host characteristics influence the acute versus chronic outcome of
viral infection. They highlight that blockade of IL-10R converted a chronic
lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection into a rapidly controlled acute
infection and prevented the functional exhaustion of memory T cells.
Also
of interest is that ACE polymorphism has, in some studies, been found to play a
role in the development of allergies too, with the DD phenotype being
associated with more progressive and severe disease (Zhou
et al, 2004; Urhan et al, 2004) and ACE polymorphism also being
associated with aspirin intolerance in asthmatics (Kim
et al, 2008). This intolerance might possibly be another bacterial toxin
effect, given that staphylococcal superantigen-specific IgE antibodies have
also been implicated in this area (Lee et al, 2006).
In
our current hypothesis, the response model is, of necessity, highly simplified.
It provides, nevertheless, a conceptual framework for the consideration of
disease treatment strategy. An understanding of the bigger picture regarding
cellular responses, and the potential manipulation of these responses by
invaders seems to provide an insight into potentially novel, effective, disease
treatment strategies. Although the main focus in this paper is towards cancer
and the use of agents that manipulate the Angiotensin system, the application
and examination of supporting evidence is extended into other diseases.
1.
Advanced Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer, (Advanced HRPC)
The
first clinical results published using Angiotensin Receptor Blockade in the
treatment of cancer are made by Uemura et al (Uemura
et al, 2005) in their pilot study in advanced hormone-refractory
prostate cancer. Twenty-three patients who had already received secondary
hormonal therapy using dexamethasone, and who were no longer receiving
conventional therapy, were enrolled (patient characteristics shown in Table
3 below). Change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA),
being an important marker of the disease, was determined as the primary
endpoint. The secondary end-point was change in performance status (measured by
the ability to perform daily tasks).
Table 3:
Characteristics of the patients enrolled in the pilot study in advanced
hormone-refractory prostate cancer
|
No
of Patients Entered |
23 |
|
Median
age (range), years |
75.9 (59-92) |
|
Performance
Status 0 |
12 |
|
Performance
Status 1 |
8 |
|
Performance
Status 2 |
3 |
|
Prior
Hormone Treatment |
23 |
|
Prior
Radiotherapy |
7 |
|
Prior
Chemotherapy |
5 |
|
Retropubic
prostatectomy |
1 |
|
Bone
only metastasis |
13 |
|
Soft
Tissue only metastasis |
2 |
|
Bone and
Soft tissue metastasis |
8 |
All
of the patients received Candesartan 8 mg per day, being the maximum allowed
dose for normal cardiovascular treatment in Japan, and androgen ablation
(Orchiectomy or with blockade for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone
(LH-RH)). The Uemura group explained that they had not expected this low dose
of an ARB (Angiotensin Receptor (Type 1) Blocker) to stop disease progression
completely, especially in patients with advanced HRPC with widespread
metastases, but they had hoped to delay it. Of the 23 patients enrolled in the
current study, 1 patient did show an objective response on this low dose, with
a 12.5% reduction in size of lung metastases. This patient had undergone total
prostatectomy for well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, PSA
started to increase 2 years after the operation, and multiple lung metastases
were found in July 1999. Although he had received Candesartan treatment since
April 2001, his PSA increased continuously for 6 months after he started on the
study. However, from November 2001, his bulky lung metastases showed shrinkage,
associated with a decline in PSA from 267 to 177 ng/ml. He finally died of
recurrence of lung metastases in May 2002, 36 months after the relapse of
prostate cancer. With regard to the change in PS in the study, five patients
showed an improvement in PS after starting Candesartan treatment. Although most
patients had multiple metastases involving bone and lymph nodes, intriguingly,
they did not require higher doses of opioid analgesics, or required only a
minimal dose. PS was stable in another five patients with minimal use of
analgesic agents (Uemura et al, 2005).
In
summary, eight patients (34.8%) showed an effect on PSA levels; six showing a
decrease immediately after starting administration and two showing a stable
level of PSA. The six men with a PSA decline of more than 50% showed an
improvement in performance status. The mean time to PSA progression across all
responders was 8.3 months and one half of these patients showed stable or
improved performance status during treatment. With regard to adverse effects,
only one patient showed hypotension during treatment. Tissue analysis using
real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
staining showed that AT1 receptor expression in well-differentiated
adenocarcinoma was higher than that in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Uemura et al, 2005).
2.
Treatment in Pheochromocytoma
More
recently, Brown et al describes two patients with pheochromocytoma in whom
treatment with higher dose angiotensin receptor blocker was associated with
cessation of growth. Dosage of 300 mg Irbesartan (another AT1 blocker) per day
was utilised in one patient and 16 mg Candesartan per day in the other (Brown et al, 2006).
Case
1
In
1984, a 32-year-old man presented with pheochromocytoma and the patient
proceeded to surgical adrenalectomy with successful cure of his symptoms and
hypertension. In 1997, he re-presented with hypertension, his plasma
norepinephrine (a marker of progression) was elevated and did not suppress with
pentolinium 2.5 mg. A CT scan showed a 1.5 cm mass in the right adrenal. No hot
spots were found on 123ImIBG scan or selective venous sampling. The patient was
therefore managed medically. Blood pressure was controlled by phenoxybenzamine,
but there was a progressive increase in plasma norepinephrine to 3.3 ng/L.
Additional therapy with an ARB, Irbesartan 150 mg, was started in 1999. In view
of the rising plasma norepinephrine levels, the dose of Irbesartan was
increased to 300 mg daily in 2001. Plasma norepinephrine peaked at 4 ng/mL and
then appeared to decline in Figure
.
Over
4 years from 1998 to 2002, the adrenal mass grew approximately 50% in diameter
but from 2002, the size of tumour remained static, as judged by the results of
the CT scans (shown in Figure
2).

Figure
9: Serial
plasma catecholamines in Case 1. The results for plasma norepinephrine (filled
columns) and epinephrine (hatched columns) are shown relative to the dose of
irbesartan, which was 150 mg daily between 1998 and 2001, and 300 mg daily
thereafter.

Figure
20: Serial CT scans in Case 1. In 1998, the diameter
of the right adrenal pheochromocytoma, arrowed, is smaller than the length of
the attached medial limb of normal adrenal, and than the diameter of the aorta.
In 2002, the tumour is a similar size to these adjacent tissues, but there is
no further increase in 2004.

Figure
11: Serial
plasma norepinephrine in Case 2. Introduction of Candesartan is associated with
a decline in plasma norepinephrine levels over the subsequent year.
Case
2
A
63-year-old man presented in 2000 with a large left adrenal phaeochromocytoma,
confirmed with MRI scans and surgically removed. At follow-up over the next
year, the patient remained well and normotensive, but in August 2004 the
patient re-presented with a CT scan confirming local recurrence in the left
adrenal bed and 18F-FDG scanning revealed both local and distal metastases.
Surgical exploration revealed multiple peritoneal seedlings and no tumour was
excised except for histological confirmation. Phenoxybenzamine was changed to
doxazosin, which was better tolerated in this patient, and ARB therapy started
with Candesartan 16 mg daily. Over the next year, plasma norepinephrine
declined, Figure
,
and the mass of tumour in the adrenal bed appeared unchanged or slightly
reduced through analysis of serial CT scans.
Both
approaches appeared well tolerated with no adverse effects. The paper also
highlights the observation that, in a patient with carcinoid syndrome and
hypertension, introduction of Candesartan at 16–32 mg for his
hypertension has been associated with an arrest of growth and 5HIAA excretion
over a 3-year period. The purpose of their report was to encourage other
physicians to consider high-dose ARB therapy, as a prelude to the design of a
prospective, comparative trial.
3.
Treatment in Advanced Renal Cancer
In
three cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Tatokoro
et al (2008) found that a combination treatment of cimetidine (a
Histamine Receptor II Antagonist), COX-2 inhibitor and RAS inhibitor
(angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor
antagonist) (CCA therapy) was effective.
Case
1
Describes
a 47-year-old man, CT scan revealing a 12-cm right renal mass invading the
iliopsoas muscle with multiple pulmonary metastases, a large amount of pleural
effusion and large hepatic metastases, providing a diagnosis of cT4N0M1 RCC. A
combination therapy consisting of cimetidine 800 mg, etodolac, a selective COX-2
inhibitor, 10 mg and Candesartan 12 mg orally was provided. After he started
CCA therapy, all the symptoms gradually disappeared and eight months later, the
metastatic lesions reduced markedly in size, achieving a partial remission
(> 50% reduction in tumour size) Figure
3. After a
year, metastatic lesions enlarged again and he died another year later.

Figure
32: Results from Case 1. Computed tomography of the
abdomen before (left) and eight months after (right) the start of CCA therapy.
Case
2
Describes
a 62-year-old man presented with a metastatic left radial tumour from clear
cell RCC. The patient, whose renal tumour was staged as T1bN0M1, underwent a
left radical nephrectomy and resection of radial tumour followed by IFN-a
subcutaneous for a year. The patient developed multiple pulmonary metastases
eighteen months after the surgery and the metastatic lesions grew despite
immune therapy (IFN-a and IL-2). When CCA therapy was started, all of the metastatic
lesions gradually reduced in size and a nearly complete remission was achieved Figure
.
He has remained well without progression for 16 months.

Figure
13: Results
from Case 2. Computed
tomography of the chest before (left) and a year after (right) the start of CCA
therapy.
Case
3
Describes
a 64-year-old man presented with a 10-cm left renal tumour with multiple
pulmonary metastases (pT3aN0M1). The patient underwent a left radical
nephrectomy and IFN-a treatment commenced for six months until liver
dysfunction. Since metastatic sites grew, CCA therapy of cimetidine 400 mg,
meloxicam 10 mg and perindopril, ACE inhibitors, 4 mg orally was commenced.
Metastatic lesions gradually reduced in size over two years, thus achieving a
partial remission, Error!
Reference source not found..
Brain metastases appeared 31 months later, however, and he died 41 months after
the commencement of CCA therapy.
None
of the three patients experienced any appreciable side effects associated with
CCA therapy. Tatokoro et al (2008) report that
is was highly unlikely that these tumour shrinkages in these cases were
spontaneous regression of RCC. The reported incidence of spontaneous tumour
regressions in RCC is extremely low (less than 1%), and most spontaneous
regressions have been observed following the treatment of the primary tumours
such as surgical removal, radiotherapy, or Embolisation.

Figure 14: Results from Case 3.
Computed tomography of the chest before (left) and 14 months after (right) the
start of combination treatment of CCA therapy.
Bacteria
have also been shown to cause cancer to be more aggressive and patients with
skin lymphoma could benefit from antibiotic treatments used for bacterial
infections in lymphatic cancer (Woetmann et al, 2007).
Ferreri et al (2006) have explored the
association between ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma (OAL) and Chlamydia psittaci
(Cp) infections (Ferreri et al, 2006), aiming
to confirm reports suggesting that doxycycline treatment causes tumour
regression in patients with Cp-related OAL. In this study, doxycycline proved a
fast, safe, and active therapy for Cp DNA-positive OAL, effective even in
patients with multiple failures, involving previously irradiated areas or
regional lymphadenopathies.
Also
of significant interest is that spontaneous tumour regression has been known to
follow certain bacterial, fungal, viral, and protozoal infections. Dr. William
Coley (1862–1936) was one of the first to capitalise on this
characteristic and was reputed to have quite some success by injecting a
cocktail of dead Streptococcus pyogenes and dead Serratia marcescens bacteria
into tumours (Hoption Can et al, 2003). The
approach, that still continues to date, leads to high fever and is associated
with tumour regression. Advocates of the approach suggest tumour associated
leucocytes display reparative functions that support tumour growth, but that
intratumoural infections may reactivate defensive functions, causing tumour
regression. The work by Tsung K, and Norton JA (2006),
“Lessons from Coley's Toxin”, suggests that the effect is due to an increase in
IL-12 (Tsung and Norton, 2006). Examination of
the model would suggest that in these cases innate responses are being
provoked. It would be a most interesting experiment to combine Angiotensin
Receptor Blockade with Coley’s toxin to see if there is an enhanced effect. Similarly, although the literature is
absent with regard to any attempt, the introduction of IL-2 in combination with
AT1 blockers to treat not only cancer but also infections may prove to be
beneficial.
Due
to strong growth responses, it would seem likely that the application of agents
that activate Retinoic Acid Receptors might be beneficial in cancer. Indeed a
number of studies confirm this, especially when used in combination with other
agents. Long-term results from children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated in
a randomized trial with standard therapy followed by treatment with
13-cis-retinoic acid show that overall survival is significantly increased at
the five-year point (Matthay et al, 2009).
Clinical studies have also found combination therapies of interleukin-2 and
13-cis retinoic acids to be beneficial in the treatment of several cancers (Recchia et al, 2007; Recchia et al, 2005; Recchia et al,
2006; Recchia et al, 2008; Gilman et al, 2009), although dosage is
important to optimise benefits Vs side effects. The additional effect of an
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker to studies such as this might prove additionally
synergistic.
Dobbs
et al have hypothesised ongoing microbial insults as a progressive cause of
idiopathic parkinsonism (Dobbs et al, 2008),
their early studies have indeed shown that eradication of Helicobacter pylori
infection has, on the whole, been proven beneficial to patients. Some patients,
however, did react quite badly to treatment and had to be withdrawn from the
study as a result of the toxic shock of the dying infections. In the case of the study by Dobbs et al (2008), it might be argued that these
patients may well have been those with the greatest degree of infection (and
the greatest need of infection eradication) and that a combination approach
with AT1 blockade again might prove beneficial to avoid the side effects of an
otherwise useful treatment. In fact, AT1 blockade has previously been
demonstrated, in a number of animal studies, to ameliorate inflammation induced
by endotoxins in a range of organs, including adrenal (Sanchez-Lemus et al, 2008),
eye (Miyazaki et al, 2008) and lung (Zhang and Sun, 2006), as well as systemically (Laesser et al, 2004).
In
this area, the diseases demonstrate an allergen-based chronic immune response
as the cause; with also a resultant derived chronic injury response (wounding
that does not heal). Potential
means to treat such diseases might include either singly or in combination the
use of the following approaches:
Ø IL-4
antagonists and ARBs might be beneficial, as they will relieve the chronic
nature of the diseases as well as potentially stimulating improved innate
responses.
Ø IL-10,
IL-2 antagonists, IGF-1 and steroids might also appear beneficial and give
short-term relief. However, the use of these agents will impair adaptive immune
responses. If there is indeed an invader, such as a virus, promoting an
allergic response, or other invaders taking advantage of the wound environment,
then these may continue to propagate. It is proposed that the use of ARBs would
be a suitable alternative to IGF-1 and steroids.
Yamagata
and Ichinose in their review ‘Agents against cytokine synthesis or receptors’ (Yamagata and Ichinose, 2006), express disappointment
that studies concerning the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-4 have been
discontinued despite promising early results in asthma. They also suggest that
‘anti-inflammatory’ cytokines such as IL-10 may have a therapeutic potential.
However, systemic delivery, as discussed earlier, may lead to longer-term
deleterious effects.
Tarantini et al (2007), in their paper ‘Asthma
treatment: magic bullets which seek their own targets' (Tarantini et al, 2007), provide an analysis of many of the
different ways of interfering along the course of the cascade of the allergic
reaction (including IL-4 and IL-10) and suggest that, at present, anti-IgE
appear to be the only 'magic bullet' for the treatment of allergic asthma.
Regarding
HIV, it has been reported that IL-10-secreting T cells from HIV-infected
pregnant women down-regulate HIV-1 replication. An effect, which is enhanced by
antiretroviral treatment (Bento et al, 2009).
Diseases
in this category demonstrate a chronic immune response as the result of an
inability to resolve wounding. Many of these diseases will likely progress with
the aid of infections, however susceptibility increases due to aging as a
result of the reduced availability of systemic and locally derived IGF-1. The
use of both AT1 blockers and IGF-1 in diseases of ageing may promote repair,
growth and healing. Once again, steroids will have a short-term benefit but
will promote immune suppression.
In
the ageing population, sarcopenia represents a progressive worsening of
skeletal muscle mass and function, which is associated with declining growth
hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels. Preclinical
studies have shown that infusion of angiotensin II produced a marked reduction
in body weight, accompanied by decreased serum and muscle levels of IGF-1. In
addition, IGF-1 serum levels have been shown to increase following ACE
inhibitor treatment (Giovannini et al, 2008; Maggio et
al, 2006). In the InCHIANTI study, in particular, of 745 subjects, it
was found that treatment with ACE inhibitors for <3 years is associated with
significantly higher levels of IGF-1. This association between the Angiotensin
System and ageing has been considered for some time. This has been postulated
to be associated with oxidative stress (Ferder et al,
2002) and specifically with changes in mitochondrial function (de Cavanagh et al, 2007).
A great System Engineer was reputed to say
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
The Cellular Response Model shown in
Figure lies at the very edge of this concept.
Cellular
responses are indeed extremely complex and the biological system processes
involve not only a great deal of redundancy but also synergistic behaviour in
its components. Despite this and
its simplicity the proposed model appears to be a powerful tool in considering
disease management strategy and a means to explain the puzzle of inflammation
and the perversion of healthy responses by cancer and infections.
A
logical summary for the placement of the TH1 and TH2 model of diseases within
the response model is also possible. Such that TH1 might be more appropriately
viewed as an innate inflammatory response to a stimulus (driven by TLRs) to a
pathogen that is resistant to this non-specific immune response. TH2 is an
allergic response driven by sensitivity to an allergen, but again an
ineffective one, with the adaptive immune system being effectively distracted.
This model might also explain, in part, the mechanism by which the human foetus
(which is considered "non-self") is protected from attack by the
adaptive immune system.
As
a final note, the prospects for Angiotensin Receptor Blockade, in particular
for the treatment of wounds that will not heal, are profound and two clinical
trials are currently in preparation by the authors to test the effects of
established angiotensin receptor blockers in conjunction with standard
chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic approaches to verify their efficacy in
cancer.

Figure 15: The Cell
Response Model portrays a conceptual representation of the key drivers and
mediators of cellular responses. Healthy response states lie within the green
and amber domains. The red domains are disease states brought about by aging or
through infection.
Gary
R Smith is a founding director of Perses Biosystems Ltd. The Initial focus is
to establish technical reputation through testing of the hypothesis by clinical
trials purely in the interests of extending scientific understanding and
without financial motivation.
In the longer term, Perses’s ambition is to identify additional drug
targets and agents to work in combination with AT1 blockers to treat a variety
of diseases.
Sotiris
Missailidis is a lecturer at the Department of Chemistry and Analytical
Sciences of the Open University and is interested in understanding the
molecular processes behind disease states for the potential development of more
successful therapeutics in the future, and has no commercial interests in this
work.
Gary R Smith proposed the hypothesis through a holistic and objective
approach backed by scientific literature review. Sotiris Missailidis has been
the academic collaborator in the development of these ideas. Both authors have
contributed to the authoring of this manuscript.
Gary
R Smith would like to acknowledge family and friends, who have significantly
contributed to this hypothesis through their experiences and questioning,
notably Paul Jaep, a long term ME sufferer, Catherine O'Driscoll and especially
Gary’s wife Alison. He would also like to make a special mention of his
grandfather Thomas William Flowers to whom he would like to dedicate this
paper.
Sotiris
Missailidis would like to acknowledge the Open University for their financial
support.
Abiko M, Rodgers KE, Campeau JD, Nakamura RM, Dizerega GS: Alterations of angiotensin II Receptor
levels in sutured wounds in rat skin. J
Invest Surg 1996, 9:447-453.
Altorki NK, Keresztes RS, Port JL, Libby DM, Korst RJ,
Flieder DB, Ferrara CA, Yankelevitz DF, Subbaramaiah K, Pasmantier MW,
Dannenberg AJ: Celecoxib, a selective
cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, enhances the response to preoperative paclitaxel
and carboplatin in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:2645-2650.
Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Sundaram C, Harikumar KB, Tharakan
ST, Lai OS, Sung B, Aggarwal BB: Cancer
is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res 2008, 25:2097-2116.
Anders H-J, Banas B, Schlondorff D: Signaling Danger: Toll-Like Receptors and their Potential Roles in
Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004,
15:854-867.
Arafat HA, Gong Q, Chipitsyna G, Rizvi A, Saa CT, Yeo CJ: Antihypertensives as novel antineoplastics:
angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor
blockers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2007, 204:996-1005;
discussion 1005-1006.
Arai H, Furuya T, Mizuno Y, Mochizuki H: Inflammation and infection in Parkinson's
disease. Histol Histopathol 2006,
21:673-678.
Arganaraz GA, Konno AC, Perosa SR, Santiago JF, Boim MA,
Vidotti DB, Varella PP, Costa LG, Canzian M, Porcionatto MA, et al: The renin-angiotensin system is upregulated
in the cortex and hippocampus of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy related
to mesial temporal sclerosis. Epilepsia
2008, 49:1348-1357.
Arrieta O, Pineda-Olvera B, Guevara-Salazar P, Hernandez-Pedro
N, Morales-Espinosa D, Ceron-Lizarraga TL, Gonzalez-De la Rosa CH, Rembao D,
Segura-Pacheco B, Sotelo J: Expression
of AT1 and AT2 angiotensin receptors in astrocytomas is associated with poor
prognosis. Br J Cancer 2008, 99:160-166.
Athyros VG, Kakafika AI, Tziomalos K, Karagiannis A,
Mikhailidis DP: Pleiotropic effects of
statins--clinical evidence. Curr
Pharm Des 2009, 15:479-489.
Attoub S, Gaben AM, Al-Salam S, Al Sultan MA, John A,
Nicholls MG, Mester J, Petroianu G: Captopril
as a potential inhibitor of lung tumor growth and metastasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1138:65-72.
Azad N, Rojanasakul Y, Vallyathan V: Inflammation and lung cancer: roles of reactive oxygen/nitrogen
species. J Toxicol Environ Health B
Crit Rev 2008, 11:1-15.
Baum M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, Retsky M: Does surgery unfavourably perturb the
"natural history" of early breast cancer by accelerating the
appearance of distant metastases? Eur
J Cancer 2005, 41:508-515.
Becker Y: HIV-1
induced AIDS is an allergy and the allergen is the Shed gp120--a review,
hypothesis, and implications. Virus
Genes 2004, 28:319-331.
Bedair HS, Karthikeyan T, Quintero A, Li Y, Huard J: Angiotensin II receptor blockade
administered after injury improves muscle regeneration and decreases fibrosis
in normal skeletal muscle. Am J
Sports Med 2008, 36:1548-1554.
Belino-Studzinska P, Pancer K: [Respiratory syncytial virus: as an etiological agent of respiratory
tract infection in children and adults]. Przegl Epidemiol 2008, 62:767-775.
Ben-Haim S, Gacinovic S, Israel O: Cardiovascular infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med 2009, 39:103-114.
Bento CA, Hygino J, Andrade RM, Saramago CS, Silva RG, Silva
AA, Linhares UC, Brindeiro R, Tanuri A, Rosenzwajg M, et al: IL-10-secreting T cells from HIV-infected
pregnant women downregulate HIV-1 replication: effect enhanced by
antiretroviral treatment. Aids 2009,
23:9-18.
Blackburn SD, Wherry EJ: IL-10, T cell exhaustion and viral persistence. Trends Microbiol 2007, 15:143-146.
Bondy B, Baghai TC, Zill P, Schule C, Eser D, Deiml T,
Zwanzger P, Ella R, Rupprecht R: Genetic
variants in the angiotensin I-converting-enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin II
receptor (AT1) gene and clinical outcome in depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005,
29:1094-1099.
Boorom KF: Is this
recently characterized gastrointestinal pathogen responsible for rising rates
of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and IBD associated autism in Europe and the
United States in the 1990s? Med
Hypotheses 2007, 69:652-659.
Breslin JW, Wu MH, Guo M, Reynoso R, Yuan SY: Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to
microvascular inflammation and barrier dysfunction in thermal injury. Shock 2008, 29:349-355.
Brody JS, Spira A: State
of the art. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inflammation, and lung cancer.
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006, 3:535-537.
Brooke SM, Sapolsky RM: The
effects of steroid hormones in HIV-related neurotoxicity: a mini review. Biological Psychiatry 2000, 48:881.
Brown ER, Charles KA, Hoare SA, Rye RL, Jodrell DI, Aird RE,
Vora R, Prabhakar U, Nakada M, Corringham RE, et al: A clinical study assessing the tolerability and biological effects of
infliximab, a TNF-alpha inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Ann Oncol 2008, 19:1340-1346.
Brown MJ, Mackenzie IS, Ashby MJ, Balan KK, Appleton DS: AT2 receptor stimulation may halt
progression of pheochromocytoma. Ann
N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1073:436-443.
Bullock GR, Steyaert I, Bilbe G, Carey RM, Kips J, De Paepe
B, Pauwels R, Praet M, Siragy HM, de Gasparo M: Distribution of type-1 and type-2 angiotensin receptors in the normal
human lung and in lungs from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Histochem Cell Biol 2001,
115:117-124.
Busquets X, MacFarlane NG, Heine-Suner D, Morla M,
Torres-Juan L, Iglesias A, Llado J, Sauleda J, Agusti AG: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene polymorphisms, smoking and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J
Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2007, 2:329-334.
Cairns BA, Barnes CM, Mlot S, Meyer AA, Maile R: Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 ligation results
in complex altered cytokine profiles early and late after burn injury. J Trauma 2008, 64:1069-1077; discussion 1077-1068.
Carey RM: Update on
the role of the AT2 receptor. Curr
Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2005, 14:67-71.
Castellon R, Hamdi HK: Demystifying
the ACE polymorphism: from genetics to biology. Curr Pharm Des 2007, 13:1191-1198.
Castro Cabezas M, Vrinten DH, Burgers JA, Croughs RJM: Central diabetes insipidus and Cushing's
syndrome due to ectopic ACTH production by disseminated small cell lung cancer:
A case report. The Netherlands
Journal of Medicine 1998, 53:32.
Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS: Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression
of COX-2. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:2131-2142.
Chan YC, Leung PS: Involvement
of Redox-Sensitive Extracellular-Regulated Kinases in Angiotensin II-Induced
Interleukin-6 Expression in Pancreatic Acinar Cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2009, 329:
450-458.
Chen FP, Gong LK, Zhang L, Wang H, Qi XM, Wu XF, Xiao Y, Cai
Y, Liu LL, Li XH, Ren J: Early lung
injury contributes to lung fibrosis via AT1 receptor in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2007, 28:227-237.
Cheskis BJ, Greger JG, Nagpal S, Freedman LP: Signaling by estrogens. J Cell Physiol 2007, 213:610-617.
Chetty A, Nielsen HC: Regulation
of Cell Proliferation by Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 in Hyperoxia-Exposed
Neonatal Rat Lung. Molecular Genetics
and Metabolism 2002, 75:265.
Chytil F: Retinoids
in lung development. FASEB J 1996,
10:986-992.
Congote LF: Monitoring
insulin-like growth factors in HIV infection and AIDS. Clin Chim Acta 2005, 361:30-53.
Cooke A, Ferraccioli GF, Herrmann M, Romani L, Schulze C,
Zampieri S, Doria A: Induction and
protection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The role of infections. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008, 26:S1-7.
Cuatrecasas P: Drug
discovery in jeopardy. J Clin Invest 2006,
116:2837-2842.
Dalgleish AG, O'Byrne K: Inflammation and cancer: the role of the immune response and
angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res 2006,
130:1-38.
D'Arpa N, Accardo-Palumbo A, Amato G, D'Amelio L, Pileri D,
Cataldo V, Mogavero R, Lombardo C, Napoli B, Conte F: Circulating dendritic cells following burn. Burns 2009, 35:513-518.
de Cavanagh EM, Piotrkowski B, Fraga CG: The interaction between the
renin-angiotensin system and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: a hypothesis
including the participation of mitochondria in aging. Front Biosci 2007, 12:1049-1062.
Deans DA, Tan BH, Wigmore SJ, Ross JA, de Beaux AC,
Paterson-Brown S, Fearon KC: The
influence of systemic inflammation, dietary intake and stage of disease on rate
of weight loss in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 2009, 100:63-69.
Debernardi-Venon W, Martini S, Biasi F, Vizio B, Termine A,
Poli G, Brunello F, Alessandria C, Bonardi R, Saracco G, et al: AT1 receptor antagonist Candesartan in selected
cirrhotic patients: effect on portal pressure and liver fibrosis markers. J Hepatol 2007, 46:1026-1033.
Delli Gatti C, Osto E, Kouroedov A, Eto M, Shaw S, Volpe M,
Luscher TF, Cosentino F: Pulsatile
stretch induces release of angiotensin II and oxidative stress in human
endothelial cells: effects of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor antagonism. Clin Exp Hypertens 2008, 30:616-627.
Demicheli R, Retsky MW, Hrushesky WJ, Baum M: Tumor dormancy and surgery-driven
interruption of dormancy in breast cancer: learning from failures. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007, 4:699-710.
Dobbs RJ, Dobbs SM, Weller C, Charlett A, Bjarnason IT,
Curry A, Ellis DS, Ibrahim MA, McCrossan MV, O'Donohue J, et al: Helicobacter hypothesis for idiopathic
parkinsonism: before and beyond. Helicobacter
2008, 13:309-322.
Dolle L, Depypere HT, Bracke ME: Anti-invasive/anti-metastasis strategies: new roads, new tools and new
hopes. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2006,
6:729-751.
Drakopanagiotakis F, Xifteri A, Polychronopoulos V, Bouros
D: Apoptosis in lung injury and
fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2008, 32:1631-1638.
Dupont J, Pierre A, Froment P, Moreau C: The insulin-like growth factor axis in cell
cycle progression. Horm Metab Res 2003,
35:740-750.
Erlinger TP, Muntner P, Helzlsouer KJ: WBC Count and the Risk of Cancer Mortality in a National Sample of U.S.
Adults: Results from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey Mortality Study. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004, 13:1052-1056.
Esteban V, Gallego-Delgado J, Lazaro A, Osende J, Mezzano S,
Egido J, Ruiz-Ortega M: Long-term
treatment with an ACE inhibitor or an AT1 antagonist avoids
hypertension-induced inflammation in the kidney. J Nephrol 2006, 19:725-731.
Everett M, Gutman H: Surgical
management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of outcome with respect
to surgical margins and technique. J
Surg Oncol 2008, 98:588-593.
Ferder LF, Inserra F, Basso N: Advances in our understanding of aging: role of the renin-angiotensin
system. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2002,
2:189-194.
Ferrari V, Valcamonico F, Amoroso V, Simoncini E, Vassalli
L, Marpicati P, Rangoni G, Grisanti S, Tiberio GA, Nodari F, et al: Gemcitabine plus celecoxib (GECO) in
advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006, 57:185-190.
Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Guidoboni M, Resti AG, Politi LS,
Cortelazzo S, Demeter J, Zallio F, Palmas A, Muti G, et al: Bacteria-eradicating therapy with
doxycycline in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: a multicenter prospective trial.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:1375-1382.
Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ:
Comparison of an inflammation-based
prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving
platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2004, 90:1704-1706.
Fowble B, Hanlon A, Freedman G, Nicolaou N, Anderson P: Second cancers after conservative surgery
and radiation for stages I-II breast cancer: identifying a subset of women at
increased risk. International Journal
of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 2001, 51:679.
Franscini LM, Von Vigier RO, Pfister R, Casaulta-Aebischer
C, Fossali E, Bianchetti MG: Effectiveness
and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist irbesartan in children with chronic
kidney diseases. Am J Hypertens 2002,
15:1057-1063.
Gao J, Lin Y, Xiao Y, Xu K, Xu W, Zhu Y, Ma Y, Bai Y: Polymorphism of angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene and genetic susceptibility to asthma with familial aggregation.
Chin Med Sci J 2000, 15:24-28.
Garay RP, Viens P, Bauer J, Normier G, Bardou M, Jeannin JF,
Chiavaroli C: Cancer relapse under
chemotherapy: why TLR2/4 receptor agonists can help. Eur J Pharmacol 2007, 563:1-17.
Gard PR: Angiotensin
as a target for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety and depression.
Expert Opin Ther Targets 2004, 8:7-14.
Ge J, Barnes NM: Alterations
in angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptor subtype levels in brain regions from
patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Eur J Pharmacol 1996, 297:299-306.
Giannitrapani L, Soresi M, La Spada E, Cervello M, D'Alessandro
N, Montalto G: Sex hormones and risk of
liver tumor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006,
1089:228-236.
Gilliver SC, Ashcroft GS: Sex steroids and cutaneous wound healing: the contrasting influences of
estrogens and androgens. Climacteric 2007,
10:276-288.
Gilliver SC, Ruckshanthi JP, Hardman MJ, Nakayama T,
Ashcroft GS: Sex dimorphism in wound
healing: the roles of sex steroids and macrophage migration inhibitory factor.
Endocrinology 2008, 149:5747-5757.
Gilliver SC, Ruckshanthi JP, Hardman MJ, Zeef LA, Ashcroft GS:
5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) retards
wound closure by inhibiting re-epithelialization. J Pathol 2009, 217:73-82.
Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, Matthay KK, Krailo M, Yu AL, Gan J,
Sternberg A, Hank JA, Seeger R, Reaman GH, Sondel PM: Phase I study of ch14.18 with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor and interleukin-2 in children with neuroblastoma after autologous bone
marrow transplantation or stem-cell rescue: a report from the Children's
Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2009,
27:85-91.
Giovannini S, Marzetti E, Borst SE, Leeuwenburgh C: Modulation of GH/IGF-1 axis: potential
strategies to counteract sarcopenia in older adults. Mech Ageing Dev 2008, 129:593-601.
Giustina A, Mazziotti G, Canalis E: Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev 2008, 29:535-559.
Gnanalingham MG, Mostyn A, Dandrea J, Yakubu DP, Symonds ME,
Stephenson T: Ontogeny and nutritional
programming of uncoupling protein-2 and glucocorticoid receptor mRNA in the
ovine lung. J Physiol (Lond) 2005,
565:159-169.
Goldman-Johnson DR, de Kretser DM, Morrison JR: Evidence that androgens regulate early
developmental events, prior to sexual differentiation. Endocrinology 2008, 149:5-14.
Grammatopoulos TN, Jones SM, Ahmadi FA, Hoover BR, Snell LD,
Skoch J, Jhaveri VV, Poczobutt AM, Weyhenmeyer JA, Zawada WM: Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist
losartan, reduces MPTP-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in
substantia nigra. Mol Neurodegener 2007,
2:1.
Granucci F, Zanoni I, Feau S, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P: Dendritic cell regulation of immune
responses: a new role for interleukin 2 at the intersection of innate and
adaptive immunity. Embo J 2003, 22:2546-2551.
Habashi JP, Judge DP, Holm TM, Cohn RD, Loeys BL, Cooper TK,
Myers L, Klein EC, Liu G, Calvi C, et al: Losartan,
an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan
syndrome. Science 2006, 312:117-121.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: The
hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100:57-70.
Harrison ML, Obermueller E, Maisey NR, Hoare S, Edmonds K,
Li NF, Chao D, Hall K, Lee C, Timotheadou E, et al: Tumor necrosis factor alpha as a new target for renal cell carcinoma:
two sequential phase II trials of infliximab at standard and high dose. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:4542-4549.
Health News: The
continuing genius of statins. These wonder drugs appear to prevent heart
attack, stroke, and Alzheimer's, as well as lung function decline. Health News 2008, 14:3-4.
Heymes C, Levy BI: [Functions
of AT2 receptors of angiotensin II]. Therapie
1998, 53:213-216.
Hitomi H, Fukui T, Moriwaki K, Matsubara K, Sun GP, Rahman
M, Nishiyama A, Kiyomoto H, Kimura S, Ohmori K, et al: Synergistic effect of mechanical stretch and angiotensin II on
superoxide production via NADPH oxidase in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens 2006, 24:1089-1095.
Hoption Cann SA, van Netten JP, van Netten C: Dr William Coley and tumour regression: a
place in history or in the future. Postgrad
Med J 2003, 79:672-680.
Hosseini-Khalili AR, Thompson J, Kehoe A, Hopkinson NS,
Khoshbaten A, Soroush MR, Humphries SE, Montgomery H, Ghanei M: Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and
late respiratory complications of mustard gas exposure. BMC Pulm Med 2008, 8:15.
Hoyer KK, Dooms H, Barron L, Abbas AK: Interleukin-2 in the development and control of inflammatory disease.
Immunol Rev 2008, 226:19-28.
Hu C, Dandapat A, Sun L, Marwali MR, Inoue N, Sugawara F,
Inoue K, Kawase Y, Jishage K, Suzuki H, et al: Modulation of angiotensin II-mediated hypertension and cardiac
remodeling by lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 deletion.
Hypertension 2008, 52:556-562.
Hunyady L, Catt KJ: Pleiotropic
AT1 receptor signaling pathways mediating physiological and pathogenic actions
of angiotensin II. Mol Endocrinol 2006,
20:953-970.
Ibragimov AI, McNeal CJ, Ritter LR, Walton JR: A mathematical model of atherogenesis as an
inflammatory response. Math Med Biol 2005,
22:305-333.
Ikura Y, Ohsawa M, Shirai N, Sugama Y, Fukushima H, Suekane
T, Hirayama M, Ehara S, Naruko T, Ueda M: Expression
of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human cirrhotic livers: Its relation to
fibrosis and portal hypertension. Hepatol
Res 2005, 32:107-116.
Imai N, Hashimoto T, Kihara M, Yoshida S, Kawana I, Yazawa
T, Kitamura H, Umemura S: Roles for host
and tumor angiotensin II type 1 receptor in tumor growth and tumor-associated
angiogenesis. Lab Invest 2007, 87:189-198.
Ingber DE: Can cancer
be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment? Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18:356-364.
Ino K, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, Yamamoto E, Nagasaka T, Nawa
A, Nomura S, Kikkawa F: Angiotensin II
type 1 receptor expression in ovarian cancer and its correlation with tumour
angiogenesis and patient survival. Br
J Cancer 2006, 94:552-560.
Irani RA, Xia Y: The
functional role of the renin-angiotensin system in pregnancy and preeclampsia.
Placenta 2008, 29:763-771.
Iwakiri D, Sheen TS, Chen JY, Huang DP, Takada K: Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA
induces insulin-like growth factor 1 and supports growth of nasopharyngeal
carcinoma-derived cell lines. Oncogene
2005, 24:1767-1773.
Iwakura Y, Nakae S, Saijo S, Ishigame H: The roles of IL-17A in inflammatory immune
responses and host defense against pathogens. Immunol Rev 2008, 226:57-79.
Iwata K, Sohda T, Irie M, Takeyama Y, Anan A, Shakado S,
Sakisaka S: Angiotensin II type 1
receptor antagonist improves the prognosis in rats displaying liver cirrhosis
induced by a choline-deficient diet. J
Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2008, 17:21-25.
Jacobs EJ, Thun MJ, Bain EB, Rodriguez C, Henley SJ, Calle
EE: A large cohort study of long-term
daily use of adult-strength aspirin and cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007, 99:608-615.
Janes KA, Albeck JG, Gaudet S, Sorger PK, Lauffenburger DA,
Yaffe MB: A systems model of signaling
identifies a molecular basis set for cytokine-induced apoptosis. Science 2005, 310:1646-1653.
Janiak P, Bidouard JP, Cadrouvele C, Poirier B, Gouraud L,
Grataloup Y, Pierre F, Bruneval P, O'Connor SE, Herbert JM: Long-term blockade of angiotensin AT1
receptors increases survival of obese Zucker rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2006, 534:271-279.
Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Yu S, Chen S, Luo Y, Prestwich GD,
Mascarenhas MM, Garg HG, Quinn DA, et al: Regulation
of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat Med 2005, 11:1173-1179.
Joglar B, Rodriguez-Pallares J, Rodriguez-Perez AI, Rey P,
Guerra MJ, Labandeira-Garcia JL: The
inflammatory response in the MPTP model of Parkinson's disease is mediated by
brain angiotensin: relevance to progression of the disease. J Neurochem 2009, 109:656-669.
Johns
Hopkins Med Lett
Statins: true wonder drugs? Health After 50 2002, 14:1-2,
7.
Joseph D'Ercole A, Ye P: Expanding the mind: insulin-like growth factor I and brain development.
Endocrinology 2008, 149:5958-5962.
Kamer AR, Craig RG, Dasanayake AP, Brys M, Glodzik-Sobanska
L, de Leon MJ: Inflammation and
Alzheimer's disease: possible role of periodontal diseases. Alzheimers Dement 2008, 4:242-250.
Kara M, Alver G, Dizbay Sak S, Kavukcu S: Implantation metastasis caused by fine
needle aspiration biopsy following curative resection of stage IB non-small
cell lung cancer. European Journal of
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2001, 20:868.
Katagiri D, Hayashi H, Victoriano AF, Okamoto T, Onozaki K: Estrogen stimulates transcription of human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Int
Immunopharmacol 2006, 6:170-181.
Kaufman RP: Dealing
with a shifting paradigm. Physician
Exec 1987, 13:10-14.
Kawajiri M, Mogi M, Osoegawa M, Matsuoka T, Tsukuda K,
Kohara K, Horiuchi M, Miki T, Kira JI: Reduction
of angiotensin II in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple
sclerosis. Mult Scler 2008, 14:557-560.
Kehoe AD, Nikiforov AM, Alexanin SS, Neronov EG, Tikhomirova
OV, Shun'kov VB, Makarova NV, Rabinovich E, Usmanova NM, Kazakov VI, et al: Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and
encephalopathy in Chernobyl cleanup workers. Eur J Neurol 2009, 16:95-100.
Khor LY, Bae K, Pollack A, Hammond ME, Grignon DJ,
Venkatesan VM, Rosenthal SA, Ritter MA, Sandler HM, Hanks GE, et al: COX-2 expression predicts prostate-cancer
outcome: analysis of data from the RTOG 92-02 trial. Lancet Oncol 2007, 8:912-920.
Kikkawa F, Mizuno M, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, Morita T, Ino K,
Nomura S, Mizutani S: Activation of
invasiveness of cervical carcinoma cells by angiotensin II. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 190:1258-1263.
Kim TH, Chang HS, Park SM, Nam BY, Park JS, Rhim T, Park HS,
Kim MK, Choi IS, Cho SH, et al: Association
of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphisms with aspirin intolerance
in asthmatics. Clin Exp Allergy 2008,
38: 1727: 1737.
Kitayama H, Maeshima Y, Takazawa Y, Yamamoto Y, Wu Y,
Ichinose K, Hirokoshi K, Sugiyama H, Yamasaki Y, Makino H: Regulation of angiogenic factors in angiotensin II infusion model in
association with tubulointerstitial injuries. Am J Hypertens 2006, 19:718-727.
Kjaer M, Magnusson P, Krogsgaard M, Moller JB, Olesen J,
Heinemeier K, Hansen M, Haraldsson B, Koskinen S, Esmarck B, Langberg H: Extracellular matrix adaptation of tendon
and skeletal muscle to exercise. J
Anat 2006, 208:445-450.
Kluwe J, Mencin A, Schwabe RF: Toll-like receptors, wound healing, and carcinogenesis. J Mol Med 2009, 87:125-138.
Kobayashi T, Teruya M, Kishiki T, Endo D, Takenaka Y, Tanaka
H, Miki K, Kobayashi K, Morita K: Inflammation-based
prognostic score, prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, predicts postoperative
outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery 2008, 144:729-735.
Krick S, Hanze J, Eul B, Savai R, Seay U, Grimminger F,
Lohmeyer J, Klepetko W, Seeger W, Rose F: Hypoxia-driven
proliferation of human pulmonary artery fibroblasts: cross-talk between
HIF-1alpha and an autocrine angiotensin system. Faseb J 2005, 19:857-859.
Krutzik SR, Modlin RL: The
role of Toll-like receptors in combating mycobacteria. Seminars in Immunology 2004, 16:35.
Kuhn DM, Ghannoum MA: Indoor
Mold, Toxigenic Fungi, and Stachybotrys chartarum: Infectious Disease
Perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003,
16:144-172.
Kundu JK, Surh YJ: Inflammation:
gearing the journey to cancer. Mutat
Res 2008, 659:15-30.
Laesser M, Oi Y, Ewert S, Fandriks L, Aneman A: The angiotensin II receptor blocker
candesartan improves survival and mesenteric perfusion in an acute porcine
endotoxin model. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand 2004, 48:198-204.
Lalani AS, Barrett JW, McFadden G: Modulating chemokines: more lessons from viruses. Immunology Today 2000, 21:100.
Laudanno OM, Cesolari JA: [Angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists as antiinflammatory and
gastric protection drugs]. Acta
Gastroenterol Latinoam 2006, 36:76-80.
Lawson JS, Gunzburg WH, Whitaker NJ: Viruses and human breast cancer. Future Microbiol 2006, 1:33-51.
Lee B, Vouthounis C, Stojadinovic O, Brem H, Im M,
Tomic-Canic M: From an Enhanceosome to a
Repressosome: Molecular Antagonism between Glucocorticoids and EGF Leads to
Inhibition of Wound Healing. Journal
of Molecular Biology, 345:1083.
Lee JM, Yanagawa J, Peebles KA, Sharma S, Mao JT, Dubinett
SM: Inflammation in lung carcinogenesis:
new targets for lung cancer chemoprevention and treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008, 66:208-217.
Lee JY, Kim HM, Ye YM, Bahn JW, Suh CH, Nahm D, Lee HR, Park
HS: Role of staphylococcal
superantigen-specific IgE antibodies in aspirin-intolerant asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc 2006, 27:341-346.
Lerner UH: Bone
remodeling in post-menopausal osteoporosis. J Dent Res 2006, 85:584-595.
Li DY, Zhang YC, Philips MI, Sawamura T, Mehta JL: Upregulation of endothelial receptor for
oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LOX-1) in cultured human coronary artery
endothelial cells by angiotensin II type 1 receptor activation. Circ Res 1999, 84:1043-1049.
Li JY, Avallet O, Berthelon MC, Langlois D, Saez JM: Effects of growth factors on cell
proliferation and angiotensin II type 2 receptor number and mRNA in PC12W and
R3T3 cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998,
139:61-69.
Liao YD, Xu H, Han Q, Lei J, Zhang YY, Wang ZH: [Expression of angiotensin II type 1
receptor in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical significance].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2007, 29:360-364.
Lilenbaum R, Socinski MA, Altorki NK, Hart LL, Keresztes RS,
Hariharan S, Morrison ME, Fayyad R, Bonomi P: Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel/irinotecan and
gemcitabine/irinotecan with or without celecoxib in the second-line treatment
of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin
Oncol 2006, 24:4825-4832.
Lin JJ, Yueh KC, Chang DC, Lin SZ: Association between genetic polymorphism of angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene and Parkinson's disease. J
Neurol Sci 2002, 199:25-29.
Lorusso L, Mikhaylova SV, Capelli E, Ferrari D, Ngonga GK,
Ricevuti G: Immunological aspects of
chronic fatigue syndrome. Autoimmun
Rev 2009, 8:287-291.
Lyons A, Kelly JL, Rodrick ML, Mannick JA, Lederer JA: Major injury induces increased production
of interleukin-10 by cells of the immune system with a negative impact on
resistance to infection. Ann Surg 1997,
226:450-458; discussion 458-460.
Maggio M, Ceda GP, Lauretani F, Pahor M, Bandinelli S,
Najjar SS, Ling SM, Basaria S, Ruggiero C, Valenti G, Ferrucci L: Relation of angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitor treatment to insulin-like growth factor-1 serum levels in subjects
>65 years of age (the InCHIANTI study). Am J Cardiol 2006, 97:1525-1529.
Mahnke K, Johnson TS, Ring S, Enk AH: Tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells: a two-way
relationship. J Dermatol Sci 2007,
46:159-167.
Mann JR, Backlund MG, DuBois RN: Mechanisms of disease: Inflammatory mediators and cancer prevention.
Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2005, 2:202-210.
Marastoni S, Ligresti G, Lorenzon E, Colombatti A, Mongiat
M: Extracellular matrix: a matter of
life and death. Connect Tissue Res 2008,
49:203-206.
Martens JW, Sieuwerts AM, Bolt-deVries J, Bosma PT, Swiggers
SJ, Klijn JG, Foekens JA: Aging of
stromal-derived human breast fibroblasts might contribute to breast cancer
progression. Thromb Haemost 2003,
89:393-404.
Martin P, Parkhurst SM: Parallels
between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 2004, 131:3021-3034.
Maruo T, Ohara N, Wang J, Matsuo H: Sex steroidal regulation of uterine leiomyoma growth and apoptosis.
Hum Reprod Update 2004, 10:207-220.
Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Adkins ES, Haas-Kogan
D, Gerbing RB, London WB, Villablanca JG: Long-term
results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial
of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's
oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2009,
27:1007-1013.
Maul B, Krause W, Pankow K, Becker M, Gembardt F, Alenina N,
Walther T, Bader M, Siems WE: Central
angiotensin II controls alcohol consumption via its AT1 receptor. Faseb J 2005, 19:1474-1481.
Maung AA, Fujimi S, L. Miller M, MacConmara MP, Mannick JA,
Lederer JA: Enhanced TLR4 reactivity
following injury is mediated by increased p38 activation. J Leukoc Biol 2005:jlb.1204698.
Maus U, Andereya S, Schmidt H, Zombory G, Gravius S,
Ohnsorge JA, Niedhart C: [Therapy
effects of testosterone on the recovery of bone defects]. Z Orthop Unfall 2008, 146:59-63.
Meduri GU: Clinical
review: A paradigm shift: the bidirectional effect of inflammation on bacterial
growth. Clinical implications for patients with acute respiratory distress
syndrome. Critical Care 2002, 6:24 - 29.
Menaker RJ, Jones NL: Fascination
with bacteria-triggered cell death: the significance of Fas-mediated apoptosis
during bacterial infection in vivo. Microbes
and Infection 2003, 5:1149-1158.
Menke MN, Menke NB, Boardman CH, Diegelmann RF: Biologic therapeutics and molecular
profiling to optimize wound healing. Gynecol
Oncol 2008, 111:S87-91.
Miller AC, Rashid RM, Elamin EM: The "T" in trauma: the helper T-cell response and the role of
immunomodulation in trauma and burn patients. J Trauma 2007, 63:1407-1417.
Miyajima A, Kosaka T, Asano T, Asano T, Seta K, Kawai T,
Hayakawa M: Angiotensin II type I
antagonist prevents pulmonary metastasis of murine renal cancer by inhibiting
tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2002,
62:4176-4179.
Miyazaki A, Kitaichi N, Ohgami K, Iwata D, Jin XH, Iwabuchi
K, Morohashi T, Ohno S, Onoe K: Anti-inflammatory
effect of angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist on endotoxin-induced uveitis
in rats. Graefes Arch Clin Exp
Ophthalmol 2008, 246:747-757.
Mizoue S, Iwai M, Ide A, Suzuki J, Horiuchi M, Shiraishi A,
Ohashi Y: Role of angiotensin II
receptor subtypes in conjunctival wound healing. Curr Eye Res 2006, 31:129-136.
Mocellin S, Marincola F, Riccardo Rossi C, Nitti D, Lise M: The multifaceted relationship between IL-10
and adaptive immunity: putting together the pieces of a puzzle. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 2004,
15:61.
Mollen KP, Anand RJ, Tsung A, Prince JM, Levy RM, Billiar
TR: Emerging paradigm: toll-like
receptor 4-sentinel for the detection of tissue damage. Shock 2006, 26:430-437.
Moskowitz DW, Johnson FE: The central role of angiotensin I-converting enzyme in vertebrate
pathophysiology. Curr Top Med Chem 2004,
4:1433-1454.
Muller OA, von Werder K: Ectopic production of ACTH and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH).
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology 1992, 43:403.
Munteanu I, Didilescu C: [Chemistry and toxicology of cigarette smoke in the lungs]. Pneumologia 2007, 56:41, 43-46.
Murphy E, Korach KS: Actions
of estrogen and estrogen receptors in nonclassical target tissues. Ernst Schering Found Symp Proc 2006:13-24.
Murphy TF: The role
of bacteria in airway inflammation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Infect
Dis 2006, 19:225-230.
Muthu K, He LK, Melstrom K, Szilagyi A, Gamelli RL, Shankar
R: Perturbed bone marrow monocyte
development following burn injury and sepsis promote hyporesponsive monocytes.
J Burn Care Res 2008, 29:12-21.
Nagai N, Oike Y, Noda K, Urano T, Kubota Y, Ozawa Y, Shinoda
H, Koto T, Shinoda K, Inoue M, et al: Suppression
of ocular inflammation in endotoxin-induced uveitis by blocking the angiotensin
II type 1 receptor. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 2005, 46:2925-2931.
Nakamura H, Inoue T, Arakawa N, Shimizu Y, Yoshigae Y,
Fujimori I, Shimakawa E, Toyoshi T, Yokoyama T: Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic study of olmesartan medoxomil in
animal diabetic retinopathy models. Eur
J Pharmacol 2005, 512:239-246.
Nakayama M, Inoguchi T, Sonta T, Maeda Y, Sasaki S, Sawada
F, Tsubouchi H, Sonoda N, Kobayashi K, Sumimoto H, Nawata H: Increased expression of NAD(P)H oxidase in
islets of animal models of Type 2 diabetes and its improvement by an AT1
receptor antagonist. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 2005, 332:927-933.
Neal CP, Mann CD, Sutton CD, Garcea G, Ong SL, Steward WP,
Dennison AR, Berry DP: Evaluation of the
prognostic value of systemic inflammation and socioeconomic deprivation in
patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 2009, 45:56-64.
Nickenig G, Sachinidis A, Seewald S, Bohm M, Vetter H: Influence of oxidized low-density
lipoprotein on vascular angiotensin II receptor expression. J Hypertens Suppl 1997, 15:S27-30.
Nicod LP, Pache JC, Howarth N: Fungal infections in transplant recipients. Eur Respir J 2001, 17:133-140.
Oakley F, Teoh V, Ching ASG, Bataller R, Colmenero J,
Jonsson JR, Eliopoulos AG, Watson MR, Manas D, Mann DA: Angiotensin II activates IkappaB kinase phosphorylation of RelA at
Ser536 to promote myofibroblast survival and liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2009 [Epub ahead of
print].
Ogarkov OB, Sin'kov VV, Medvedeva TV, Gutnikova M, Nekipelov
OM, Raevskaia L, Kuptsevich N, Kostiunin K, Skvortsova RG: [Polymorphism of genes of the renin-angiotensin system ACE, AT1R, and
AT2R in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis]. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol 2008:12-18.
Owczarek H, Lewczuk E: Serum
peptide III-procollagen and ACE in asbestos workers. Pol J Occup Med Environ Health 1991, 4:127-133.
Ozacmak VH, Sayan H, Cetin A, Akyildiz-Igdem A: AT1 receptor blocker candesartan-induced
attenuation of brain injury of rats subjected to chronic cerebral
hypoperfusion. Neurochem Res 2007,
32:1314-1321.
Pasare C, Medzhitov R: Toll-like
receptors: balancing host resistance with immune tolerance. Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15:677.
Pasare C, Medzhitov R: Toll-like
receptors: linking innate and adaptive immunity. Adv Exp Med Biol 2005, 560:11-18.
Paterson HM, Murphy TJ, Purcell EJ, Shelley O, Kriynovich
SJ, Lien E, Mannick JA, Lederer JA: Injury
primes the innate immune system for enhanced Toll-like receptor reactivity.
J Immunol 2003, 171:1473-1483.
Peebles KA, Lee JM, Mao JT, Hazra S, Reckamp KL, Krysan K,
Dohadwala M, Heinrich EL, Walser TC, Cui X, et al: Inflammation and lung carcinogenesis: applying findings in prevention
and treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer
Ther 2007, 7:1405-1421.
Peehl DM, Wong ST, Cramer SD, Gross C, Feldman D: Suramin, hydrocortisone, and retinoic acid
modify inhibitory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on prostatic epithelial
cells. Urologic Oncology: Seminars
and Original Investigations 1995, 1:188.
Pelaia G, Vatrella A, Gallelli L,
Renda T, Cazzola M, Maselli R, Marsico SA: Respiratory
infections and asthma. Respir
Med 2006, 100:775-784.
Pelletier G, Ren L: Localization
of sex steroid receptors in human skin. Histol
Histopathol 2004, 19:629-636.
Pinto Mendes J: The
role of infection in asthma. Rev Port
Pneumol 2008, 14:647-675.
Platet N, Cathiard AM, Gleizes M, Garcia M: Estrogens and their receptors in breast
cancer progression: a dual role in cancer proliferation and invasion. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2004,
51:55.
Pordeus V, Szyper-Kravitz M, Levy RA, Vaz NM, Shoenfeld Y: Infections and autoimmunity: a panorama.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2008, 34:283-299.
Rabbani MA, Mahmood MS, Mekan SF, Frossard PM: Association of angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of lupus disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2008, 19:761-766.
Ramachandran V, Ismail P, Stanslas J, Shamsudin N, Moin S,
Mohd Jas R: Association of
insertion/deletion polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with
essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysian subjects. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2008,
9:208-214.
Recchia F, Saggio G, Cesta A, Alesse E, Gallo R, Necozione
S, Rea S: Phase II randomized study of
interleukin-2 with or without 13-cis retinoic acid as maintenance therapy in
patients with advanced cancer responsive to chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 2005, 25:3149-3157.
Recchia F, Saggio G, Cesta A, Candeloro G, Di Blasio A, Amiconi
G, Lombardo M, Nuzzo A, Lalli A, Alesse E, et al: Phase II study of interleukin-2 and 13-cis-retinoic acid as maintenance
therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2007, 56:699-708.
Recchia F, Saggio G, Nuzzo A, Biondi E, Di Blasio A, Cesta
A, Candeloro G, Alesse E, Rea S: Multicenter
phase 2 study of interleukin-2 and 13-cis retinoic acid as maintenance therapy
in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J
Immunother 2006, 29:87-94.
Recchia F, Sica G, Candeloro G, Necozione S, Bisegna R,
Bratta M, Rea S: Maintenance
immunotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep 2008, 20:1173-1179.
Reckamp KL, Krysan K, Morrow JD, Milne GL, Newman RA, Tucker
C, Elashoff RM, Dubinett SM, Figlin RA: A
phase I trial to determine the optimal biological dose of celecoxib when
combined with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006, 12:3381-3388.
Reis e Sousa C: Activation
of dendritic cells: translating innate into adaptive immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology 2004, 16:21.
Riaz AA, Wang Y, Schramm R, Sato T, Menger MD, Jeppsson B,
Thorlacius H: Role of angiotensin II in
ischemia/reperfusion-induced leukocyte-endothelium interactions in the colon.
Faseb J 2004, 18:881-883.
Richmond RS, Tallant EA, Gallagher PE, Ferrario CM, Strawn
WB: Angiotensin II stimulates
arachidonic acid release from bone marrow stromal cells. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2004,
5:176-182.
Rocken C, Neumann K, Carl-McGrath S, Lage H, Ebert MP,
Dierkes J, Jacobi CA, Kalmuk S, Neuhaus P, Neumann U: The gene polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme correlates
with tumor size and patient survival in colorectal cancer patients. Neoplasia 2007, 9:716-722.
Rocken C, Rohl FW, Diebler E, Lendeckel U, Pross M,
Carl-McGrath S, Ebert MP: The
angiotensin II/angiotensin II receptor system correlates with nodal spread in
intestinal type gastric cancer. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16:1206-1212.
Rodriguez-Pallares J, Rey P, Parga JA, Munoz A, Guerra MJ,
Labandeira-Garcia JL: Brain angiotensin
enhances dopaminergic cell death via microglial activation and NADPH-derived
ROS. Neurobiol Dis 2008, 31:58-73.
Ross JS, Stagliano NE, Donovan MJ, Breitbart RE, Ginsburg
GS: Atherosclerosis and cancer: common
molecular pathways of disease development and progression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001, 947:271-292; discussion 292-273.
Ross R: Atherosclerosis--an
inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999,
340:115-126.
Saibeni S, Spina L, Virgilio T, Folcioni A, Borsi G, de
Franchis R, Cugno M, Vecchi M: Angiotensin-converting
enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 19:976-981.
Sanchez-Lemus E, Murakami Y, Larrayoz-Roldan IM, Moughamian
AJ, Pavel J, Nishioku T, Saavedra JM: Angiotensin
II AT1 receptor blockade decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in
the rat adrenal gland. Endocrinology 2008,
149:5177-5188.
Savaskan E, Hock C, Olivieri G, Bruttel S, Rosenberg C,
Hulette C, Muller-Spahn F: Cortical
alterations of angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II and AT1 receptor
in Alzheimer's dementia. Neurobiol
Aging 2001, 22:541-546.
Schneider CP, Schwacha MG, Chaudry IH: The role of interleukin-10 in the regulation of the systemic
inflammatory response following trauma-hemorrhage. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 2004,
1689:22.
Schulman IH, Raij L: The
angiotensin II type 2 receptor: what is its clinical significance? Curr Hypertens Rep 2008, 10:188-193.
Schwacha MG, Daniel T: Up-regulation
of cell surface Toll-like receptors on circulating gammadelta T-cells following
burn injury. Cytokine 2008, 44:328-334.
Seckl JR, Meaney MJ: Glucocorticoid
Programming. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004,
1032:63-84.
Sengupta S, Wasylyk B: Physiological
and Pathological Consequences of the Interactions of the p53 Tumor Suppressor
with the Glucocorticoid, Androgen, and Estrogen Receptors. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004, 1024:54-71.
Sethi S: Coinfection
in exacerbations of COPD: a new frontier. Chest 2006, 129:223-224.
Shafiq N, Malhotra S, Pandhi P, Grover A: The "Statinth" wonder of the
world: a panacea for all illnesses or a bubble about to burst. J Negat Results Biomed 2005, 4:3.
Shankar A, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Yu MC, Kefford R, Mitchell
P: Association Between Circulating White
Blood Cell Count and Cancer Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:188-194.
Sharma R, Hook J, Kumar M, Gabra H: Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with
advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer
2008, 44:251-256.
Sharma R, Zucknick M, London R, Kacevska M, Liddle C, Clarke
SJ: Systemic inflammatory response
predicts prognosis in patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008, 7:331-337.
Shen L, Mo H, Cai L, Kong T, Zheng W, Ye J, Qi J, Xiao Z: LOSARTAN PREVENTS SEPSIS-INDUCED ACUTE LUNG
INJURY AND DECREASES ACTIVATION OF NF-kappaB AND MAPKs. Shock 2009, 31: 500-506.
Shibata K, Kikkawa F, Mizokami Y, Kajiyama H, Ino K, Nomura
S, Mizutani S: Possible involvement of
adipocyte-derived leucine aminopeptidase via angiotensin II in endometrial
carcinoma. Tumour Biol 2005, 26:9-16.
Sica A, Allavena P, Mantovani A: Cancer related inflammation: the macrophage connection. Cancer Lett 2008, 267:204-215.
Silverman MN, Pearce BD, Biron CA, Miller AH: Immune Modulation of the
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis during Viral Infection. Viral Immunology 2005, 18:41-78.
Slaviero KA, Clarke SJ, Rivory LP: Inflammatory response: an unrecognised source of variability in the
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2003, 4:224-232.
Smith CJ, Perfetti TA, King JA: Perspectives on pulmonary inflammation and lung cancer risk in
cigarette smokers. Inhal Toxicol 2006,
18:667-677.
Smith GR, Missailidis S: Cancer, inflammation and the AT1 and AT2 receptors. J Inflamm (Lond) 2004, 1:3.
Smith GR: Treatment
of Cancer in Conjunction with Other Agents. In Anticancer Therapeutics (Missailidis, ed); 2008: 349-364
Sonnex C: Influence
of ovarian hormones on urogenital infection. Sex Transm Infect 1998, 74:11-19.
Sparks DL, Hunsaker JC, 3rd, Amouyel P, Malafosse A,
Bellivier F, Leboyer M, Courtet P, Helbecque N: Angiotensin I-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism and suicidal
behaviors. Am J Med Genet B
Neuropsychiatr Genet 2009, 150B:290-294.
Steckelings UM, Henz BM, Wiehstutz S, Unger T, Artuc M: Differential expression of angiotensin
receptors in human cutaneous wound healing. Br J Dermatol 2005, 153:887-893.
Steckelings UM, Wollschlager T, Peters J, Henz BM, Hermes B,
Artuc M: Human skin: source of and
target organ for angiotensin II. Exp
Dermatol 2004, 13:148-154.
Sun G, Haginoya K, Dai H, Chiba Y, Uematsu M, Hino-Fukuyo N,
Onuma A, Iinuma K, Tsuchiya S: Intramuscular
renin-angiotensin system is activated in human muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci 2009, 280:40-48.
Sutmuller R, Garritsen A, Adema GJ: Regulatory T cells and toll-like receptors: regulating the regulators.
Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66 Suppl 3:iii91-95.
Suzuki Y, Ruiz-Ortega M, Lorenzo O, Ruperez M, Esteban V,
Egido J: Inflammation and angiotensin
II. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003,
35:881-900.
Tahir M, Sharma SK, Ashraf S, Mishra HK: Angiotensin converting enzyme genotype
affects development and course of sarcoidosis in Asian Indians. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2007, 24:106-112.
Tamari M, Harada M, Hirota T, Nakamura Y: Host molecular defense mechanisms against
Chlamydophila pneumoniae and genetic studies of immune-response-related genes
in asthma. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy
Drug Discov 2009, 3:17-25.
Tamura M, Chen YJ, Howard EF, Tanner M, Landon EJ, Myers PR:
Lipopolysaccharides and cytokines
downregulate the angiotensin II type 2 receptor in rat cardiac fibroblasts.
Eur J Pharmacol 1999, 386:289-295.
Taranova AG, Maldonado D, 3rd, Vachon CM, Jacobsen EA,
Abdala-Valencia H, McGarry MP, Ochkur SI, Protheroe CA, Doyle A, Grant CS, et
al: Allergic pulmonary inflammation
promotes the recruitment of circulating tumor cells to the lung. Cancer Res 2008, 68:8582-8589.
Tarantini F, Baiardini I, Passalacqua G, Braido F, Canonica
GW: Asthma treatment: 'magic bullets
which seek their own targets'. Allergy
2007, 62:605-610.
Tatokoro M, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Fukui N, Komai Y, Saito K,
Koga F, Morimoto S, Fukui I, Kihara K: Favorable
response to combination treatment of cimetidine, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and
renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Report
of three cases. Int J Urol 2008, 15:848-850.
Tauro S, Su YC, Thomas S, Schwarze J, Matthaei KI, Townsend
D, Simson L, Tripp RA, Mahalingam S: Molecular
and cellular mechanisms in the viral exacerbation of asthma. Microbes Infect 2008, 10:1014-1023.
Toblli JE, Munoz MC, Cao G, Mella J, Pereyra L, Mastai R: ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade
prevent fatty liver and fibrosis in obese Zucker rats. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008, 16:770-776.
Todorovic V, Pesko P, Micev M, Bjelovic M, Budec M, Micic M,
Brasanac D, Ilic-Stojanovic O: Insulin-like
growth factor-I in wound healing of rat skin. Regul Pept 2008, 150:7-13.
Toulon A, Breton L, Taylor KR, Tenenhaus M, Bhavsar D, Lanigan
C, Rudolph R, Jameson J, Havran WL: A
role for human skin-resident T cells in wound healing. J Exp Med 2009, 206:
743-750.
Toussirot E, Roudier J: Epstein-Barr
virus in autoimmune diseases. Best
Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22:883-896.
Tsang SW, Cheng CH, Leung PS: The role of the pancreatic renin-angiotensin system in acinar digestive
enzyme secretion and in acute pancreatitis. Regul Pept 2004a, 119:213-219.
Tsang SW, Ip SP, Leung PS: Prophylactic and therapeutic treatments with AT 1 and AT 2 receptor
antagonists and their effects on changes in the severity of pancreatitis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004b, 36:330-339.
Tseng RJ, Padgett DA, Dhabhar FS, Engler H, Sheridan JF: Stress-induced modulation of NK activity
during influenza viral infection: role of glucocorticoids and opioids. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2005, 19:153.
Tsung K, Norton JA: Lessons
from Coley's Toxin. Surg Oncol 2006,
15:25-28.
Turney MK, Nicholson WE, Kovacs WJ: Gene expression phenotyping of an ACTH-producing small cell lung cancer
line. Molecular and Cellular
Endocrinology 2004, 219:105.
U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Routine aspirin or
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the primary prevention of colorectal
cancer. Ann Intern
Med 2007, 146:361-364.
Uemura H, Hasumi H, Kawahara T, Sugiura S, Miyoshi Y,
Nakaigawa N, Teranishi J, Noguchi K, Ishiguro H, Kubota Y: Pilot study of angiotensin II receptor blocker in advanced
hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Int
J Clin Oncol 2005, 10:405-410.
Uppal SS, Haider MZ, Hayat SJ, Abraham M, Sukumaran J,
Dhaunsi GS: Significant association of
insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with
rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007,
34:2395-2399.
Urhan M, Degirmenci I, Harmanci E, Gunes HV, Metintas M,
Basaran A: High frequency of DD
polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene in Turkish asthmatic
patients. Allergy Asthma Proc 2004,
25:243-247.
Vairaktaris E, Yapijakis C, Tsigris C, Vassiliou S, Derka S,
Nkenke E, Spyridonidou S, Vylliotis A, Vorris E, Ragos V, et al: Association of angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism with increased risk for oral
cancer. Acta Oncol 2007, 46:1097-1102.
Vaziri ND, Bai Y, Ni Z, Quiroz Y, Pandian R, Rodriguez-Iturbe
B: Intra-renal angiotensin II/AT1
receptor, oxidative stress, inflammation, and progressive injury in renal mass
reduction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2007,
323:85-93.
Veillard NR, Mach F: Statins:
the new aspirin? Cell Mol Life Sci 2002,
59:1771-1786.
Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, Kilgour RD, Hamel N, Hornby L,
Lucar E, Foulkes W, Tremblay ML, Morais JA: Relationship Between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Polymorphism
and Body Composition, Functional Performance, and Blood Biomarkers in Advanced
Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2009,
15: 2442-2447.
Vladutiu GD, Natelson BH: Association of medically unexplained fatigue with ACE
insertion/deletion polymorphism in Gulf War veterans. Muscle Nerve 2004, 30:38-43.
Walton RP, Johnston SL: Role
of respiratory viral infections in the development of atopic conditions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 8:150-153.
Watanabe T, Pakala R, Katagiri T, Benedict CR: Mildly oxidized low-density lipoprotein
acts synergistically with angiotensin II in inducing vascular smooth muscle
cell proliferation. J Hypertens 2001,
19:1065-1073.
Whiteside TL: The
role of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Treat Res 2006, 130:103-124.
Whiteside TL: The
tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 2008, 27:5904-5912.
Woetmann A, Lovato P, Eriksen KW, Krejsgaard T, Labuda T,
Zhang Q, Mathiesen A-M, Geisler C, Svejgaard A, Wasik MA, Odum N: Nonmalignant T cells stimulate growth of
T-cell lymphoma cells in the presence of bacterial toxins. Blood 2007, 109:3325-3332.
Wolf G: Retinoic acid
as cause of cell proliferation or cell growth inhibition depending on
activation of one of two different nuclear receptors. Nutr Rev 2008, 66:55-59.
Wu J, Meng Z, Jiang M, Pei R, Trippler M, Broering R, Bucchi
A, Sowa JP, Dittmer U, Yang D, et al: Hepatitis
B virus suppresses toll-like receptor-mediated innate immune responses in
murine parenchymal and nonparenchymal liver cells. Hepatology 2009, 49:1132-1140.
Wu P, Dupont WD, Griffin MR, Carroll KN, Mitchel EF,
Gebretsadik T, Hartert TV: Evidence of a
causal role of winter virus infection during infancy in early childhood asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 178:1123-1129.
Xia Y, Zhou CC, Ramin SM, Kellems RE: Angiotensin receptors, autoimmunity, and preeclampsia. J Immunol 2007, 179:3391-3395.
Yamagata T, Ichinose M: Agents
against cytokine synthesis or receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 2006, 533:289-301.
Yang YH, Liu CK: Angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene in Alzheimer's disease. Tohoku
J Exp Med 2008, 215:295-298.
Yaren A, Turgut S, Kursunluoglu R, Oztop I, Turgut G,
Degirmencioglu S, Kelten C, Erdem E: Insertion/Deletion
polymorphism of the Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene in patients with
breast cancer and effects on prognostic factors. J Investig Med 2007, 55:255-261.
Yasuda N, Akazawa H, Qin Y, Zou Y, Komuro I: A novel mechanism of mechanical
stress-induced angiotensin II type 1-receptor activation without the
involvement of angiotensin II. Naunyn
Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2008, 377:393-399.
Yigit B, Bozkurt N, Narter F, Yilmaz H, Yucebas E, Isbir T: Effects of ACE I/D polymorphism on prostate
cancer risk, tumor grade and metastatis. Anticancer Res 2007, 27:933-936.
Yoshiji H, Noguchi R, Fukui H: [RAAS inhibitors as therapeutic alternatives in the treatment of
chronic liver diseases]. Nippon
Rinsho 2009, 67:799-806.
Zhang H, Sun GY: Expression
and regulation of AT1 receptor in rat lung microvascular endothelial cell. J Surg Res 2006, 134:190-197.
Zhou J, Tian X, Xu Q: Angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism in children with Henoch-Schonlein
purpua nephritis. J Huazhong Univ Sci
Technolog Med Sci 2004, 24:158-161.
Zuniga MC: Lessons in
detente or know thy host: the immunomodulatory gene products of myxoma virus.
J Biosci 2003, 28:273-285.