Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 6, 159-167, 2001
Surface-shielded
polycation-based systems targeting reporter and therapeutic genes to distant
tumors
Review
Article
Ralf Kircheis1*,
Lionel Wightman1, Malgorzata Kursa1, Birgit Smrekar1,
Elinborg Ostermann1, and Ernst Wagner1,2
1Boehringer Ingelheim Austria, Dr. Boehringer Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna,
Austria
2Current address: Pharmaceutical Biology - Biotechnology,
Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München, Butenandtstr. 5-13, D-81377 Munich,
Germany
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Ralf
Kircheis, MD, Ph.D., Cancer Vaccines & Gene Therapy, Boehringer Ingelheim
Austria GmbH Dr. Boehringer-Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43-(1)-80105
2790, Fax: +43-(1)-80105 2683; e-mail: ralf.kircheis@vie.boehringer-ingelheim.com
Key
words: gene therapy, tumor targeting, non-viral gene transfer,
polyethylenimine, PEI, polyplex, transferrin, tumor necrosis factor, TNFa
Abbreviations: polyethylene
glycol, (PEG); polyethylenimine, (PEI); transferrin,
(Tf); transferrin-polyethylenimine, (Tf-PEI); tumor necrosis factor,
(TNFa)
Summary
We have
developed surface-shielded transferrin-polyethylenimine (Tf-PEI) - based gene
delivery systems which are able to target gene expression to distant tumors
after systemic application in murine models. For systemic in vivo application
the biophysical parameters of transfection complexes, such as particle size,
stability, surface charge, and modification with targeting ligand, were found
to be critical for DNA biodistribution, toxicity, and gene transfer efficacy.
Two major mechanisms may contribute to the tumor-specific targeting: active
targeting via receptor-mediated cell binding and passive targeting via
shielding of the surface charge of the complexes. Shielding reduces plasma
protein and erythrocyte binding, resulting in prolonged blood circulation and
extravasation of DNA complexes in areas of vascular leakiness of the tumor
tissue. Shielding of surface charges can be achieved by coating polycation/DNA
complexes with either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or by incorporating Tf ligand
at high densities. Systemic application of surface-shielded
transferrin-polyethylenimine-based DNA complexes coding for tumor necrosis
factor (TNFa) localized gene
expression to distant tumors, resulting in pronounced hemorrhagic tumor
necrosis and inhibition of tumor growth. TNFa activity was confined
to the tumor without systemic TNF-related toxicity.
I. Introduction
Gene therapy has become an attractive concept for a broad variety
of biomedical applications. The potential of gene therapy for directing the
expression of therapeutic genes to the target cells makes it particularly
attractive for treatment of cancer. Multiple levels of target specificity are
attainable: by exploiting specific delivery mechanisms to target the tumor
(biochemical or physical targeting), specific intracellular characteristics of
the target cells (e.g. preferential targeting of proliferating cells),
controlled tissue-specific expression (transcriptional targeting), and
utilizing biological amplification mechanisms (e.g. during transcription /
translation, bystander effects, triggering immune effector mechanism). However,
the lack of effective and target-specific vectors is a major bottleneck for
somatic gene therapy to date. Non-viral vectors are increasingly being utilized
as gene delivery vehicles because of advantages such as stability, low cost,
and high flexibility regarding the size of the transgene delivered. However,
major limitations for non-viral gene delivery vectors include unspecific binding
to non-target tissues, inefficient uptake into the target cells, limited
release from endosomes, and inefficient import into the nucleus of target
cells.
Recently we have developed surface-shielded transferrin-polyethylenimine
(Tf-PEI) - based gene delivery systems which are able to target gene expression
to distant tumors after systemic application in murine models (Kircheis et al, 1999, 2001a,b). For
target specificity cell-binding ligands, such as transferrin, EGF, or
antibodies, can be coupled to polyethylenimine (PEI) (Kircheis
et al, 1997;
Zanta et al, 1997;
Erbacher et al, 1999;
Blessing et al, 2001),
resulting in vectors that combine the intrinsic activities of PEI (Boussif
et al, 1995) with specific receptor-mediated uptake
mechanism (Wagner et al, 1994).
Furthermore, DNA biodistribution and gene transfer
efficacy after systemic application in vivo is determined by the biophysical parameters of transfection
complexes, such as particle size, stability and surface charge (Kircheis et al, 1999, 2001a). Shielding of the
transfection complexes from unspecific interaction combined with active
targeting mechanisms resulted in specific uptake in tumors. Shielding the
surface charge of transfection complexes was achieved by coating polycation/DNA
complexes with polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Kircheis et al, 1999; Ogris
et al, 1999) or by incorporating Tf ligand at high densities (Kircheis
et al, 2001a).
Surface-shielded transferrin-polyethylenimine-based gene delivery
systems were used in syngeneic murine tumor models to deliver a therapeutic
gene, coding for tumor necrosis factor (TNFa). TNFa is a highly potent pleiotropic cytokine, and is well known for
its ability to induce hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and tumor regression (Old, 1985). However, the clinical
application of TNFa is hampered by its high systemic toxicity (Beutler et al, 1985). In contrast, systemic application of surface-shielded Tf-PEI
complexes with the TNFa gene resulted in pronounced hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and
inhibition of tumor growth without systemic TNF-related toxicity due to the
localization of the activity of the cytokine to the tumor. These data indicate
that targeted gene delivery to tumors may be an attractive strategy applicable
to highly active, yet, toxic molecules in cancer treatment.
II. Results
A. Ligand-polycation based receptor-mediated gene transfer
Condensation of DNA by electrostatic interactions with polycations
is being used to protect DNA from degradation by nucleases, resulting in
formation of compact particles that can be taken up by the cells via natural
processes such as adsorptive endocytosis or phagocytosis. Among the synthetic
vectors, PEI shows particularly promising efficacy in transfection in cell
culture as well as in a variety of applications in vivo (Boussif et al, 1995;
Abdallah et al, 1996;
Goula et al, 1998). Beside its DNA condensing activity PEI has an intrinsic
endosomolytic activity mediating, by a ‘proton sponge mechanism’, the escape of
DNA from the endosomal department (Boussif et al, 1995;
Kichler et al, 2001).

Figure 1. Ligand-polycation based receptor-mediated gene transfer
To combine the high gene transfer efficacy of PEI/DNA complexes
with the target-specific mechanism of receptor-mediated uptake, we have
incorporated cell-binding ligands (Kircheis et al, 1997;
Blessing et al, 2001), such as transferrin (Tf)
or EGF into the complex by chemical coupling to PEI.
Binding of the Tf ligand-coated DNA complexes to the Tf receptor
on the target cells, followed by endocytosis into vesicles, escape of the DNA
from the endosomal compartment, and nuclear entry are critical steps for
efficient transfection (Figure 1).
The efficacy of these intracellular steps is influenced by the cell-binding
ligand, the type of the polycationic carrier, and the physical characteristics
such as the size of the transfection complex. Large particles (from several
hundred nm up to mm) generated at physiological salt concentrations were found to
have higher transfection efficacy compared to small sized complexes (~50nm) formed
in salt-free buffers (Ogris et al, 1998). Particle size is also dependent on the DNA (and
polycation) concentration during complex formation and on polycation to DNA
ratio. Compact particles of small size are usually obtained at higher
polycation/DNA ratios (i.e. N/P ratios), resulting in complexes with a strong
net positive charge, i.e. high zeta-potential. At neutrality polycation/DNA
complexes have the tendency for particle aggregation. The requirement to have
excessive positive charge for efficient DNA complexation, however, can cause
major problems particularly for in vivo
applications.
B. Systemic application in
vivo
Compared to cell culture applications gene delivery in vivo has to overcome a variety of
additional problems. Passing blood circulation and organs such as liver and
spleen which are specialized in removal of foreign particles pose obstacles
particularly for systemic application of transfection complexes. Furthermore,
the particles have to be small enough to leave the vascular system and to
diffuse through the tissues to reach their target (Figure 2).
Another major problem are unspecific interactions with blood
components, extracellular matrix and non-target cells. Positively charged
polycation/DNA complexes were found to aggregate in physiological salt, to
interact with components of the coagulation and complement systems, and to
cause aggregation of erythrocytes which can result in occlusion of capillaries
e.g. in the lungs, leading to lung embolism (Plank et al, 1996;
Ogris et al, 1999;
Kircheis and Wagner, 2000). Furthermore, recognition
and uptake by cells of the reticuloendothelial system will cause rapid removal
from the circulation (Figure 3).
We have shown that unspecific interaction with plasma components
or erythrocytes can be prevented by shielding the surface of transfection
particles by covalent modification with PEG without affecting the
target-specific transferrin ligand - receptor interactions (Kircheis et al, 1999;
Ogris et al, 1999) (Figure 4).
More recently we have employed an alternative strategy for masking the surface
charge of DNA complexes. It was found that transferrin in the complex not only
can serve as a cell-binding ligand but also mediate efficient shielding of the
surface charge. In fact, incorporation of Tf at higher densities into the
complex was shown to shield the positive surface charge of PEI/DNA complexes
formed with low molecular weight PEIs (e.g. 25kDa, 22kDa) also in the absence
of PEGylation (Kircheis et al, 2001a).

Figure 2. Multiple barriers for polycation/DNA complexes for targeted gene
expression following systemic in vivo application

Figure 3. Unspecific interactions of positively charged polycation/DNA
complexes

Figure 4. Shielding transfection complexes from non-specific interactions
and incorporation of targeting mechanisms DNA is condensed into
compact positively charged particles by excessive polycation. Incorporation of
cell-binding ligands provides the possibility for specific binding to the
target cells. At the same time also non-specific interactions with blood
components and non-target cells are possible. Non-specific interactions can be
blocked by shielding the surface of the transfection complexes either by
covalent coupling of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or by incorporating the ligand
transferrin at sufficiently high densities.
Shielding of the surface charge of PEI/DNA complexes, generating
particles with a near neutral zeta-potential, blocks the aggregation of
erythrocyte. In contrast, non-shielded complexes induce massive erythrocyte
aggregation (Figure 5). Systemic
application of non-shielded luciferase reporter gene complexes into
tumor-bearing mice resulted in high gene expression in the lungs, lower
expression in other organs, such as the heart and liver, but was often
accompanied by considerable toxicity Particularly when high molecular
PEI800/DNA complexes were used approximately half of the animals died with
signs of lung embolism (Kircheis et al, 1999). Complexes using the
lower molecular weight PEIs (e.g. 25kDa or 22kDa) showed generally lower
toxicity, particularly when the linear PEI22 was used (Goula
et al, 1998; Wightman et al, 2001). With all PEIs lung
expression was prominent with varying expression levels in other major organs
or the tumor. In contrast Tf-PEI/DNA complexes shielded either by PEG or high
densitiy Tf resulted in preferable reporter gene expression in the tumor.
Furthermore, expression in the lungs or in the other organs was dramatically
reduced (Figure 6). Shielding of the
transfection complexes from unspecific interactions was shown to lead to longer
circulation times in the blood (Ogris et al, 1999) resulting in extravasation in areas of higher vascular
permeability such as tumors (passive targeting) (Gerlowski and Jain,
1986; Kircheis and Wagner, 2000). Further studies on
the biodistribution of transfection complexes showed a significant accumulation
of shielded transfection complex in the tumor compared to non-shielded
complexes (Kircheis et al, 1999; 2001b). Beside the passive
targeting obviously also active targeting mechanisms such as enhanced uptake by
Tf-receptor expressing (Wagner et al, 1994;
Kircheis et al, 1997) and highly proliferating tumor cells (Brunner et al, 2000) are contibuting to the
preferential gene expression in the tumor.
C. Tumor-targeted gene delivery of TNFa
We were particularly interested in applying this tumor-targeted
gene delivery system for delivering a highly active effector molecule TNFa. TNFa is a cytokine with pronounced antitumor activity (Old, 1985). It is known to act on a
broad variety of cells, particularly damaging the vascular system of the tumor.
The problem with conventional TNFa rotein therapy has been
its high systemic toxicity (Beutler et al, 1985). Since
both, antitumor activity and systemic toxicity seem to share common
pathophysiological mechanisms, the only possibility to separate the antitumor
activity from its systemic toxicity is to localize TNFa ctivity to the tumor.

Figure 5. Shielding of the surface charge of transfection complexes blocks
aggregation of erythrocytes.Non-shielded positively charged polycation/DNA
complexes induce aggregation of erythrocytes. Shielding of the surface charge
by incorporation of the ligand transferrin at high densities in the complex
blocks the aggregation of erythrocytes.

Figure 6. Reporter gene expression
after systemic gene delivery into tumor-bearing mice. Positively charged
PEI/DNA complexes (a), or high
density transferrin incorporation (b),
or charge-shielded Tf-PEI/DNA complexes after PEGylation (c) were injected into the tail vein of A/J mice bearing
subcutaneously growing Neuro2a tumors. Zeta potential of the complexes was
measured using a Malvern Zetasizer and is shown in mV. Gene expression in the
major organs and tumor was measured by luciferase assay 24 h after application.
Mean values ± SEM are shown.
Surface-shielded
transfection complexes containing an expression plasmid coding for murine TNFa were repeatedly applied systemically into the tail vein of BALB/c
mice bearing subcutaneously growing MethA fibrosarcoma on their flank. After a
few days the majority of the animals developed pronounced hemorrhagic tumor
necrosis, which is one of the hallmarks of the antitumor activity of TNFa Figure 7). Moreover,
hemorrhagic necrosis was focused specifically to the tumor, and no systemic
toxicity was seen.
Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis was associated by visible
inhibition of tumor growth. In approximately 60% of the TNFa treated animals finally a complete tumor regression was seen (Figure 7). These animals were also
protected from subsequent tumor rechallenge. In untreated animals or control
animals, which received similar transfection complexes containing the b-alactosidase gene, no hemorrhagic necrosis and only occationally
sponteneous tumor regressions were observed.TNFa-specific
induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis was also demonstrated in another tumor
model, the Neuro2a neuroblastoma. Surface-shielded transfection complexes
coding for TNFa were systemically applied into Neuro2a bearing A/J mice,
resulting in significant TNFa gene expression (as measured by ELISA) within the tumor, without
detectable serum levels (data not shown). After one week of treatment 85% of
the TNFa treated animals developed hemorrhagic tumor necrosis while in
animals without treatment or treated with similar transfection complexes
containing the b-galactosidase reporter gene or the non-expressing pSP65 plasmid
tumor necrosis was found only in 5%, 16%, or 12%, respectively. Induction of
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis

Figure 7. Tumor-targeted gene delivery of TNFa leads to hemorrhagic tumor
necrosis and tumor regression. Surface-shielded transfection complexes
containing an expression plasmid coding for murine TNFa were repeatedly applied
systemically into the tail vein of BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneously growing
MethA fibrosarcoma on their flank. 60% of the animals developed pronounced
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis (upper left), no systemic toxicity was seen.
Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis was associated by inhibition of tumor
growth resulting in more than half of the TNFa treated animals in
complete tumor regression (upper right). Control animals treated with similar
transfection complexes containing the b-galactosidase gene did not develop hemorrhagic
tumor necrosis (lower panel).

Figure 8. TNFa specific induction of
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and inhibition in tumor growth in the Neuro2a tumor
model. Surface-shielded transfection
complexes coding for TNFa were systemically applied
into Neuro2a bearing A/J mice. After one week of treatment 85% of the TNFa treated animals developed
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis in contrast to animals treated with similar
transfection complexes having the b-galactosidase reporter
gene. Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis resulted in a significant
inhibition of tumor growth in the TNFa treated animals as
compared to the control groups. Mean values ± SEM of groups of 6 animals
are shown.
resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth in the TNFa treated animals as compared to the control groups (Figure 8).
A therapeutically applicable non-viral gene delivery vector should
comprise a number of essential functions including condensation and protection
of DNA, uptake into the target cells, and expression of the desired gene at the
target site. Incorporation of cell-binding ligands, endosomal release
enhancers, and nuclear localization signals can enable specific and efficient
gene delivery and expression. For in vivo
application the physical and colloidal parameters of transfection complexes,
such as particle size, surface charge, and stability are critical factors which
determine DNA biodistribution and gene expression. Knowing these parameters and
their complex interplay will provide the basis for the rational design of gene
delivery systems applicable for in vivo
application. Finally, shielding transfection complexes from unspecific
interactions, incorporation of active cell targeting mechanisms, combined with
transcriptional targeting by using tissue-specific promotors or
hypoxia-responsive elements (Dachs et al, 1997) should ensure that the gene of interest is only expressed
at the desired target site.
The presented data using reporter and therapeutic genes indicate
that targeted gene delivery to tumors may be an attractive strategy applicable
to highly active, yet toxic molecules such as TNFa in cancer
treatment.
References
Abdallah B, Hassan A, Benoist C, Goula
D, Behr JP, and Demeneix BA (1996) A
powerful nonviral vector for in vivo gene transfer into the adult mammalian
brain: polyethylenimine. Hum Gene Ther
7, 1947-1954.
Beutler B, Milsark IW, and Cerami A (1985) Passive immunization against
Cachectin/Tumor Necrosis Factor protects mice from lethal effect of endotoxin. Science 229, 869-871.
Blessing T, Kursa M, Holzhauser R,
Kircheis R, and Wagner E (2001)
Different strategies for formation of PEGylated EGF-conjugated PEI/DNA
complexes for targeted gene delivery. Bioconjugate
Chem 12, 529-537.
Boussif O, Lezoualc'h F, Zanta MA,
Mergny MD, Scherman D, Demeneix B, and Behr JP (1995) A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into
cells in culture and in vivo - polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 7297-7301.
Brunner S, Sauer T, Carotta S, Cotton
M, Saltik M, and Wagner E (2000)
Cell cycle dependence of gene transfer by lipoplex, polyplex and recombinant
adenovirus. Gene Ther 7, 401-407.
Dachs GU, Patterson AV, Firth JD,
Ratcliffe PJ, Townsend KMS, Stratford IJ, and Harris AL (1997) Targeting gene expression to hypoxic tumor cells. Nature Med 3, 515-520.
Erbacher P, Remy JS, and Behr JP (1999) Gene transfer with synthetic
virus-like particles via the integrin-mediated endocytosis pathway. Gene Ther 6, 138-145.
Gerlowski LE, and Jain RK (1986) Microvascular permeability of
normal and neoplastic tissue. Microvasc
Res 31, 288-305.
Goula D, Benoist C, Mantero S, Merlo G,
Levi G, and Demeneix BA (1998)
Polyethylenimine-based intravenous delivery of transgenes to mouse lung. Gene Ther 5, 1291-1295.
Kichler A, Leborgne C, Coeytaux E, and
Danos O (2001)
Polyethylenimine-mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study. J Gene Med 3, 135-144.
Kircheis R and Wagner E (2000) Polycation/DNA complexes for in
vivo gene delivery. Gene Therapy and
Regulation 1, 95-114.
Kircheis R, Blessing T, Wightman L,
Brunner S, and Wagner E (2001) Tumor
targeting with surface-shielded ligand-polycation DNA complexes. J Controlled Rel 72, 165-170.
Kircheis R, Kichler A, Wallner G, Kursa
M, Ogris M, Felzmann T, Buchberger M, and Wagner E (1997) Coupling of cell-binding ligands to polyethylenimine for
targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther 4,
409-418.
Kircheis R, Schüller S, Brunner S,
Ogris M, Heider KH, Zauner W, and Wagner, E (1999) Polycation-based DNA complexes for tumor-targeted gene
delivery in vivo. J Gene Medicine 1,
111-120.
Kircheis R, Wightman L, Schreiber A,
Robitza B, Rössler V, Kursa M, and Wagner E (2001) Polyethylenimine/DNA complexes shielded by transferrin target
gene expression to tumors after systemic application. Gene Ther 8, 28-40.
Ogris M, Brunner S, Schüller S,
Kircheis R, and Wagner E (1999)
PEGylated DNA/Transferrin-PEI complexes: Reduced interaction with blood
components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene
delivery. Gene Ther 6, 595-605.
Ogris M, Steinlein P, Kursa M, Mechtler
K, Kircheis R, and Wagner E (1998)
The size of DNA/transferrin-PEI complexes is an important factor for gene
expression in cultured cells. Gene Ther 5, 1425-1433.
Old LJ (1985) Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF). Science 230, 630-632.
Plank C, Mechtler K, Szoka F, and
Wagner E (1996) Activation of the
complement system by synthetic DNA complexes: A potential barrier for
intravenous gene delivery. Hum Gene Ther 7, 1437-1446.
Wagner E, Curiel D, Cotten M (1994) Delivery of drugs, proteins and
genes into cells using transferrin as a ligand for receptor-mediated
endocytosis. Adv Drug Del Rev 14,
113-136.
Wightman L, Kircheis R, Roessler V,
Carotta S, Ruzicka R, Kursa M, and Wagner E (2001) Different behavior of branched and linear polyethylenimine
for gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. J
Gene Med 3, 362-372.
Zanta MA, Boussif O, Adib A, and Behr
JP (1997) In vitro gene delivery to
hepatocytes with galactosylated polyethylenimine. Bioconjugate Chem 8,
841-844
.