Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 6, 183-194, 2001
Integrating
vector and stem cell-based strategies for gene therapy of Duchenne muscular
dystrophy
Review
Article
Michael L. Roberts1*, Steve Patterson2, and George Dickson1
1Centre for Biomedical
Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway-University of London,
Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.
2Department of
Immunology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Chelsea and
Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Michael L. Roberts, Division of
Biochemistry, Royal Holloway - University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX,
United Kingdom, Tel: +44 (0)1784 443873, Fax: +44 (0)1784 434326,
e-mail:M.L.Roberts@rhul.ac.uk
Key
words: muscular
dystrophy, hybrid virus, adenovirus, retrovirus, macrophage, and stem cell
Abbreviations:
Duchenne Muscular
Dystrophy, (DMD); green fluorescent protein, (GFP); herpes simplex virus type
1, (HSV-1); Tibialis Anterior, (TA)
Summary
We review novel gene transfer strategies proposed to be
suitable for the treatment Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD): use of hybrid
adeno-retroviral vectors to stably replace dystrophin ultimately in patients
lacking this gene and the potential intravenous application of stem cells and
monocytes for targeted gene transfer. We discuss the limitations of current
vector technology and demonstrate the need for continual evolution of vector
design that is required before gene therapy of complex monogenic diseases such
as DMD becomes a reality.
I. Introduction
DMD
is a debilitating X-linked muscle wasting disease affecting 1 in 3500 newborn
boys, about one-third of these cases arise from spontaneous mutations (Emery,
1993). The dystrophin gene is one of the largest known spanning some 2.5 Mb
(hence the high rate of spontaneous mutations) and comprises 79 exons spliced
into a 14 kb cDNA. The encoded protein has a molecular mass of 427 kDa and is
located in the sarcolemmal membrane (Figure
1). The primary functions of
dystrophin are the maintenance of myofibre integrity and the mediation of
intracellular signal transduction (Brenment
et al, 1995; Grady et al, 1999; Bredt, 1999). The N-terminus of
dystrophin binds actin, anchoring the protein to the intracellular matrix,
whereas the C-terminus binds to the Dystrophin Associated Glycoprotein (DAG)
complex, thought to be involved in signalling. The DAG complex in turn spans
the sarcolemmal membrane binding the basal lamina and forms the link to the
extracellular matrix. The intervening region is made up of actin-like rod
domains and hinge regions that serve as a buffer during muscle contraction. In
the absence of dystrophin muscle fibres are disorganised, degenerate and after
several cycles of regeneration are replaced by fatty tissue resulting in loss
of contractile strength. There are a number mouse models available for this
disease, but the most commonly used is the naturally occurring mdx mouse, which contains a point
mutation on exon 23 encoding a stop codon resulting in the termination of gene
expression (Rydercook et al, 1988). It is the scope of this review to discuss
some of the evolving genetic therapeutic techniques that may be applicable to
the treatment of this otherwise incurable disease.
II. Current viral-based
gene therapy of DMD
Due to its
large size it is difficult to construct viral vectors expressing the
full-length dystrophin gene. However, there are truncated forms available,
lacking some of the rod and hinge regions (England et al, 1990; Yuasa et al,
1998, Wang and Xiao, 2000). The most

Figure
1. Schematic diagram of
the dystrophin associated glycoprotein complex. Dystrophin confers structural
integrity upon muscle fibres by linking the surrounding extracellular matrix to
the cytoskeleton via the dystrophin associated glycoprotein complex. The long
intervening region comprising of rod and hinge repeat regions absorbs stress
induced during muscle contraction
widely used is mini-dystrophin (6.3 kb)
isolated from a patient suffering from Becker Muscular Dystrophy (a mild form
of DMD) (England et al, 1990). Overexpression of this mini-gene has been shown
to restore expression of the DAG complex at the sarcolemma (Vincent et al,
1993; Rafael et al, 1994), reduce the extent muscle degeneration (Vincent et
al, 1993; Decrouy et al, 1997), maintain myofibre integrity (Decrouy et al,
1997) and increase the force generating capacity of dystrophic muscle (Yang et
al, 1998). In recent years shorter micro-dystrophin constructs ranging from
3.7-4.5kb have been developed and shown to provide a few of these therapeutic
benefits (Yuasa et al, 1998; Wang and Xiao, 2000). A number of the current
viral vectors incorporating full-length and truncated dystrophin genes in their
design with potential application for the treatment of DMD are listed below.
(a)
Adenovirus. Recombinant viral vectors based on the adenovirus are the most
extensively used vectors for gene transfer in skeletal muscle (Quantin et al,
1992; Alameddine et al, 1994; Ascadi et al, 1996; Clemens et al, 1996; Petrof
et al, 1996; Floyd et al, 1998; Yuasa et al, 1998; van Deutekom et al, 1999).
However, first generation adenoviral-mediated mini-dystrophin expression in the
muscle is short-term in nature, only lasting up to two months post-injection
(Ascadi et al, 1996), although this can be extended by treatment with FK506
(Lochmuller et al, 1996). It is generally accepted that adenoviral-mediated
expression elicits a powerful cytotoxic T-cell response resulting in the
clearance of transduced fibres and a reduction in the force generating capacity
of the muscle (Lochmuller et al, 1996, Petrof et al, 1996). Moreover, first and
second generation vectors are limited in that they are only able to accommodate
the 6.3kb mini-dystrophin construct with a simple promoter/enhancer element.
However, their ease of use, ability to replicate to high titres in
complementing cell lines and high infectivity of a number of cell types has led
to the further development of this vector. Newer generations of adenoviral
vectors have all viral genes deleted and comprise only the cis elements (ITRs) required for replication with the packaging
signal and a stuffer fragment of DNA (Ascadi et al, 1996; Clemens et al, 1996;
Chen et al, 1997; Balkir et al, 1998). These vectors have the capacity to
express the full-length dystrophin gene driven by complex muscle specific
promoters and a second reporter gene (Chen et al, 1997). Development of third
generation vectors has led to a marked improvement in the duration of transgene
expression in vivo due to their
ability to evade the immune response (Chen et al, 1997). Although these recent
developments in adenoviral vectorology have been promising this vector is not
well suited to DMD because its genome is maintained episomally. As the vector
is non-integrating it is likely the therapeutic gene would be lost during
pathological turnover of muscle cells in dystrophic tissue, notwithstanding the
stability of mature muscle fibres expressing dystrophin (Vincent et al, 1993).
(b)
Adeno-Associated Virus. Vectors based on this virus hold great promise for gene
therapy of a number of diseases where the defective gene is relatively small.
In its wild-type form the virus is non-pathogenic and integrates at a specific
site within chromosome 19 (Linden et al, 1996). However, rep-deleted recombinant AAV vectors do not integrate into this
specific region (Ponnazhagan et al, 1997). In order to solve this problem
hybrid AAV/Adenoviral (Lieber et al, 1999; Recchia et al, 1999; Ueno et al,
2000) and AAV/Herpes virus (Fraefel et al, 1997; Johnston et al, 1997;
Costantini et al, 1999) vectors have been constructed to provide the rep gene in trans. Interestingly, the long-term gene expression obtainable
from AAV is not associated with a deleterious immune response making them ideal
vectors to express small heterologous secreted proteins, e.g. ApoE3 and
clotting Factor IX, using skeletal muscle as an expression platform
(Athanasopoulos et al, 2000). Although AAV vectors are efficient at infecting
both mature and immature muscle (Pruchnic et al, 2000), their small size is a
major drawback for the treatment of DMD. The maximum insert capacity is only
5.0 kb thus restricting the type of gene that can be inserted to synthetic
micro-dystrophin constructs whose application to the treatment of DMD is
expected to be limited (Yuasa et al, 1998).
(c)
Retrovirus. During the life cycle of the retrovirus its genome integrates into
the infected cell subsequent to cell division. As such retroviral vectors hold
great promise for the treatment of DMD due to the capacity of degenerated
muscle tissue to regenerate, a process mediated by muscle satellite stem cells
(Fassati et al, 1995). However, injection of neat retroviral suspensions into
dystrophic muscle is not an efficient means of delivery because the
administration of low viral titres achievable during the vector preparation
stage is insufficient to transduce the relatively low proportion of dividing
myoblasts in dystrophic tissue (Fassati et al, 1995). This can be overcome by
implanting retroviral producer cells into the target muscle resulting in
efficient stable transduction of fibres provided muscle degeneration is induced
(Fassati et al, 1996), and has even been shown to be an efficient means of
introducing mini-dystrophin into dystrophic tissue for long-term expression
(Dunckley et al, 1993; Fassati et al, 1997). However, there are major safety
limitations in implanting such a cell line into patients considering the severe
inflammatory response and formation of palpable tumours derived from producer
cells observed in mdx mice treated in
this manner (Fassati et al, 1996).
(d)
Lentivirus. Lentiviral vectors have two distinct advantages over retroviral
vectors; firstly, they are able to stably transduce non-dividing cells and
secondly, they can be produced to much higher titres enabling them to be
efficiently applied in vivo (Sakoda
et al, 1999). A number of researchers have shown that lentiviral vector can
mediate expression of transgene in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle cells in vivo for up to one year with minimal
cytotoxicity (Kafri et al, 1997; Sakoda et al, 1999; Seppen et al, 2001).
Despite these studies the application of lentiviral vectors to muscle-related
disease has not occurred at the rate one would anticipate. This is likely a
consequence of concerns over safety as most current vectors are based on Human
Immunodeficiency Virus. This scenario is likely to change as lentiviral vector
technology evolves into systems based on forms of the virus that are restricted
to productive life cycles in other species. Indeed vectors based on Feline
Immunodeficiency Virus have now been shown to efficiently transduce a number of
human cell types (Johnson et al, 1999; Curren et al, 2000) and even hamster
skeletal muscle (Johnson et al, 1999). If these studies can be extended into
human skeletal muscle then there may be a significant future for
lentiviral-mediated gene therapy of DMD.
(e)
Herpesvirus. Vectors based on the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) represent
a potentially useful system for the treatment of DMD. The virus is able to
accommodate up to 30 kb of heterologous DNA, making it an ideal vector to express
full-length dystrophin. Indeed, replication defective HSV-1 vectors with single
and triple mutations in the immediate early genes have been shown to
efficiently deliver both mini- and full length dystrophin to muscle fibres in vivo (Akkaraju et al, 1999), although
the long-term efficacy of HSV-1-mediated gene transfer is yet to be examined.
Given the well-established link to cytotoxicity further disabled HSV-1 vectors
may have to be developed in order to obtain prolonged expression.
Each
of the vectors listed above have features that are advantageous to gene therapy
but no one comprises all the elements required for an ideal gene transfer
vector e.g. large insert capacity, capability to evade the immune response,
ability to integrate safely into the host genome and with minimum toxicity to
target cells. In order to address this issue a number of researchers have
developed hybrid viral vectors. These include gene delivery systems based on
Adenovirus/Retrovirus (Feng et al, 1997; Lin, 1998; Ramsey et al, 1998; Caplen
et al, 1999; Duisit et al, 1999; Roberts et al, 2001), Adeno-Associated
Virus/Herpes Simplex Virus (Fraefel et al, 1997; Johnston et al, 1997;
Costantini et al, 1999), Adenovirus/Adeno-Associated Virus (Recchia et al,
1999; Lieber et al, 1999; Ueno et al, 2000), Semliki Forest Virus/Retrovirus
(Li and Garoff, 2001), Epstein-Barr virus/Retrovirus (Tan et al, 1999), Herpes
Simplex Virus/Retrovirus (Parrish et al, 1999), and Poxvirus/Retrovirus (Holzer
et al, 1999). The hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system may be particularly
applicable to the treatment of DMD. Both dividing and non-dividing muscle cells
are efficiently infected with adenoviral vectors and the retrovirus confers an
integrative capacity to transduced cells (Reynolds et al, 1999). Production of
functional retroviral vector using this hybrid system is a two-step process;
target cells are infected with adenoviruses expressing retrovirus structural
genes and proviral sequences. Infected cells release functional retroviral
vector, which then tranduces neighbouring cells, resulting in the stable
integration of the therapeutic gene (Figure
2). Using adenovirus templates to
produce retroviral vector in this manner offers an opportunity to produce
retroviral vector in situ, thus
reducing complement-mediated lysis and increasing the efficiency

Figure 2. Hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system.
Putative producer cells are infected with adenoviral vectors expressing the
retroviral genome (AdLXIN), Gag-Pol (Adgagpol) and amphitrophic envelope protein
(Ad10A1env). The infected cells assemble retroviral vector, which is released
into the surrounding environment and transduces neighbouring cells. The
proviral genome integrates during cell division creating a stable cell line
expressing therapeutic transgene.
of retroviral vector transduction at
the target site. Vectors constructed using this approach have already been used
in two rodent models of cancer and shown to efficiently transduce rapidly
dividing cancer cells (Feng et al, 1997; Caplen et al, 1998). One aspect of DMD
pathology makes it
an ideal target for gene therapy by in
situ delivery of retroviral vector. Muscle fibres not expressing dystrophin
degenerate and are subsequently replaced by proliferating myoblast stem cells
during regeneration. If existing muscle fibres were allowed to act as a
platform for retroviral production then regenerating myoblasts could be
transduced by newly produced retroviral vector in the surrounding milieu.
III. Novel strategies for the treatment of DMD
A. Muscle as a platform for retroviral vector
production
Proliferating
myoblasts and mature differentiated myotubes have been shown to act as
efficient retroviral producer cells in
vitro when using hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors (Figure 3; Roberts et al, 2001a). The most efficient hybrid
adeno-retroviral vector system comprises three adenoviral vectors expressing
retroviral components; Adgag-pol, Ad10A1env and AdLXIN (adenoviral vector
encoding retroviral genome with gene of interest). The triple vector system has
been shown to be a more efficient means of producing retroviral vector when
compared to the two vector system, where gag,
pol and env are expressed from one adenoviral vector (Lin, 1998, Roberts et
al, 2001a). Myoblasts are able to generate retroviral vector titres of 5x104
cfu/ml after 48 hours, which drops significantly after a couple of days.
Interestingly, post-mitotic myotubes generate higher titres of retroviral
vector (up to 3x105 cfu/ml) and production from these mature muscle
cells does not drop over time (Roberts et al, 2001a). This would suggest that
post-mitotic cells are more efficient at sustained production of retroviral
vectors compared to dividing cells. This postulation was confirmed when cell
division was inhibited in immature cultures of myotubes proposed to contain a
higher proportion of myoblasts as an increase in retroviral vector production
was observed (Roberts et al, 2001a). It is likely that proliferating myoblasts
sequester retroviral vector subsequent to its production resulting in the
generation of lower levels of vector for harvesting. Moreover, as the
adenovirus is episomal, during proliferation of the producer cell all the
components required for retroviral vector production are lost, thus over
Adenoviral Vector Only Hybrid Adeno-Retroviral


Figure 3. Cultures of myoblasts and myotubes
produce retroviral vector. Proliferating immature myoblasts and post-mitotic
differentiated myoblasts were infected with adenoviral vector alone or with the
hybrid adeno-retroviral system expressing GFP. After two days medium was
harvested from infected myocytes and used to transduce semi-confluent cultures
of NIH 3T3 cells. One day subsequent to transduction geneticin was added and
the transduced 3T3 cells were cultured for several weeks. Only NIH 3T3 cells
treated with medium isolated from hybrid adeno-retroviral infected myoblasts
and myotubes survived in the presence of geneticin, thus indicating the
successful production of retroviral vector.
time fewer myoblasts will contain the
elements required for retroviral vector production. These observations
suggested that mature skeletal muscle might serve as an efficient long-term
production platform for retroviral vector production given that the majority of
cells in the muscle are post-mitotic myofibres.
The ability of muscle cells in vitro to produce relatively high titres of retroviral vector holds great promise for the gene therapy of DMD. Particularly since these results have recently been reproduced in vivo. In a recent study Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle from mdx mice was injected with the adeno-retroviral vector system expressing the LacZ gene (Roberts et al, submitted). Retroviral vector production was allowed to occur for one week and primary muscle cultures were prepared from the infected tissue. After the primary myoblast cultures had fused to form myotubes LacZ expression was analysed revealing that colonies of transduced myotubes only formed in cultures isolated from TA muscles infected with all the components required to make a retroviral vector (Roberts et al, submitted). Moreover, there was a ten-fold increase in the overall number of cells expressing b-galactosidase. We then examined the effect of retroviral production on the overall number of myofibres expressing LacZ in a TA muscle. After one week in normal mdx mice,retroviral vector production led to a two-fold increase in the number of myofibres expressing LacZ (Roberts et al, submitted). However, after four weeks the number of fibres expressing LacZ had fallen significantly suggesting an immune response to vector and transgene sequences had resulted in the destruction of transduced fibres (Roberts et al, submitted). Similar analysis in immunodeficient nude mdx mice revealed that by allowing the TA to act as a factory of retroviral vector production for four weeks there was a five-fold increase in the total number of LacZ-expressing myofibres (Roberts et al, submitted). These data suggest that provided muscle regeneration is induced, the hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system may be a good way to stably transduce skeletal muscle provided the issues of adenoviral-mediated immunogenicity and retroviral promoter shutdown are addressed.
The hybrid
adeno-retroviral vector system has also been used to slow the progression of
muscular dystrophy in mdx mice.
Neonates treated with hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors comprising a 3.7kb
micro-dystrophin construct expressed the therapeutic transgene throughout most
of the treated muscle (Figure 4).
This efficient micro-dystrophin expression resulted in the restoration of
components of the DAG complex (b-dystroglycan, a-sarcoglycan
and b-sarcoglycan)
that would otherwise be absent in dystrophic tissue (Roberts et al, submitted).
Moreover, expression of micro-dystrophin decreased the total number of
degenerating myofibres in the TA muscle of mdx
mice. Taken with the data indicating restoration of the DAG complex, it is likely
that expression of micro-dystrophin from hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors
partially corrects the dystrophic phenotype. Moreover, the authors developed a
novel nested PCR method to monitor retroviral integration (Figure 5). By using this
procedure a specific product indicative of integration was detected only in
animals injected with all the components required to produce retroviral vector,
indicating that LTR duplication had occurred and the retroviral provirus had
integrated into the muscle cell genome (Roberts et al, submitted).

Figure 4. Adeno-retroviral-mediated expression
of microdystrophin in muscle. Muscle injected with components required for the
production of retroviral vector expressing micro-dystrophin (lower section) or
uninjected (upper section) and stained with antibody against the C-terminus of
dystrophin. Note the efficient expression of the micro-dystrophin construct
localises to the sarcolemmal membrane conferring structural integrity to the
muscle.
B. Strategies Based on Cell-Mediated Gene Transfer
As
an alternative to viral vector-based strategies it has been proposed that
intravenous transplantation of bone marrow stem cells from healthy individuals
may serve to act as a stable source of dystrophin-expressing muscle satellite
stem cells provided sufficient numbers of cells locate to the muscle (Gussoni
et al, 1999). Intravenous transplantation of whole bone marrow, haematopoietic
and muscle-derived stem cells from wild-type C57BL/10 mice can reconstitute
lethally irradiated mdx recipients
with all myeloid cell lineages. Moreover, up to 10% of muscle fibres from the
TA muscle in recipient mice were found to express dystrophin derived from
donors after three months (Gussoni et al, 1999). In a separate study a similar
level of dystrophin expression (12%) in mdx
mice intra-arterially transplanted with muscle-derived cells was only shown to
occur subsequent to severe muscle damage in muscle groups near the injected
artery (Torrente et al, 2001). Although stem cell-mediated therapy of DMD holds
great promise a recent study has demonstrated the extremely low efficiency of
this technique in the mdx4cv mouse
model (Ferarri et al, 2001). The mdx4cv
model has a stop codon mutation in exon 53 of the dystrophin gene preventing
the formation of revertant dystrophin-expressing fibres that arise after exon
skipping and allow for the expression of truncated functional forms of
dystrophin. Less than one percent of muscle fibres were found to express
dystrophin at any time over ten months in mdx4cv
mice injected with whole bone marrow cells. The cumulative data from these
studies would suggest that stem cell mediated recruitment of
dystrophin-expressing myoblasts to dystophic muscle might only occur through
revertant fibres. If this were indeed proven to be the case then the
application of this type of therapy to the treatment of DMD will be extremely
limited.
It
has also been proposed that circulating monocytes may be able to deliver
dystrophin constructs to the site of muscle degeneration provided they can be
induced to produce retroviral vector (Parrish et al, 1996). During the
degeneration of skeletal muscle large numbers of monocytes and macrophages that
act to clear muscle cell debris infiltrate the damaged tissue (Figure 6). Using a hybrid HSV-1 amplicon/retroviral vector system Parrish
and colleagues were able to convert a monocyte/macrophage cell line into
retroviral producing cells releasing retroviral vector capable of transducing
dividing myoblasts (Parrish et al, 1999). However, the overall efficiency of
this technique was found to be extremely low as less than 0.1 % of myoblasts
were transduced by retroviral vector produced from macrophages. This was likely
a consequence of the toxicity that the HSV-1 vector conferred on the producer
monocytes coupled with the low level of HSV-1-mediated monocyte infection
(approximately 1% of monocytes were proposed to be producer cells). Given the
high efficiency of adenoviral-mediated human monocyte/macrophage transduction (Figure 7), we proposed to use the hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system in
a similar monocyte-mediated targeting approach. In preliminary studies we used
monocyte/macrophages infected with hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors expressing
green fluorescent protein

Figure 5. Novel PCR-based technique to detect
integrated retroviral sequences in genomic DNA. During retroviral reverse
transcription of genomic RNA and subsequent integration into the host genome
the 3’-LTR U3 sequence duplicates to form the 5’-LTR U3 sequence of the
proviral integrant. Forward primer 1 binds to both the 5’ and 3’ LTR and is
used in conjunction with reverse primer 2, which binds to the retroviral
packaging signal, to amplify target sequences. Nested PCR is then employed
using identical reverse primer 2 with forward primer 3 that specifically binds
the retroviral 3’LTR. Therefore, amplicon only accumulates subsequent to
retroviral LTR duplication and is indicative reverse transcription and
integration.

Figure 6. Monocyte localisation to dystrophic
tissue. A 10 mm
muscle section is stained with antibody recognising the Mac-1 cell surface
marker present only on murine monocyte/macrophages. Note the accumulation of
signal around a number of myofibres (indicated by arrowhead) that are likely to
be degenerating.

Figure 7. Adenoviral-mediated expression of
transgene in human monocytes. FACS analysis of human monocyte infected with
adenoviral vector expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Dose response
indicates some 60 % of cells can be transduced by using a relatively low dose
of vector (approximately 100 plaque forming units per monocyte).

Figure 8. Gene transfer to muscle cells using
monocytes as delivery vehicles. Mouse monocytes were infected with adenoviral
vector alone (A) or with
adeno-retroviral vector capable of producing retrovirus expressing GFP (B). Infected monocytes were co-cultured
with primary cultures from mdx muscle
at the myoblast stage. After two weeks post-mitotic myotubes formed and were
analysed for GFP expression by fluorescent microscopy. A four-fold increase in
GFP expression amongst myotubes was observed in cultures infected with hybrid
adeno-retroviral vector
(GFP) to transduce proliferating cultures of
primary myoblasts from the mdx mouse
(Roberts et al, 2000). We achieved a four-fold increase in GFP expression in
myotubes co-cultured with macrophages producing retroviral vector over negative
controls (Figure 8). However, retroviral vector
production was also found to be inefficient in monocyte/macrophages when using
the adeno-retroviral vector system, presumably because adenoviral infection of
macrophages results in the release of cytokines (Kristofersson et al, 1997;
Zhang et al, 2001), which may attenuate expression from the retroviral LTR
(Kitamura, 1999). It will be necessary to optimise this method by employing
retroviral elements with hybrid CMV/LTR promoters and adenoviral vectors with
increased deletions and lower cytotoxicity to improve the efficiency of this
approach before examining its feasibility in
vivo.
IV.
Conclusions
Considering
that researchers are yet to discover the perfect gene transfer vector a number
of groups have started to combine the favourable elements from different viral
vectors to construct chimeras. One such hybrid viral system has particular
application for the treatment of DMD. Using a hybrid adeno-retrovirus,
differentiated myotubes have been shown to efficiently produce retroviral
vector. Moreover, skeletal muscle acts as an efficient platform for retroviral
vector production resulting in increased transduction of myofibres in vivo. These observations have direct
applications for the treatment of DMD. Indeed, expression of micro-dystrophin
mediated from a hybrid adeno-retroviral vector partially corrects the
dystrophic phenotype of mdx mice.
Furthermore, expression of transgene was shown to be stable as indicated by the
detection of retroviral vector sequences in genomic DNA isolated from
transduced muscle fibres. Due to the high rate of muscle turnover observed in
DMD patients it is essential that an effective therapy should involve the
targeted delivery of therapeutic transgene so that it is expressed for life. In
order to achieve this goal gene transfer systems based on integrating viral
vectors and muscle stem cells must be further developed. Indeed, future studies
may reveal that successful gene therapy of DMD will only arise from a marriage
between viral and cell-mediated gene transfer techniques.
References
Akkaraju GR, Huard J, Hoffman EP, Goins
WF, Pruchnic R, Watkins SC, Cohen JB, and Glorioso JC (1999) Herpes simplex virus vector-mediated dystrophin gene transfer
and expression in MDX mouse skeletal muscle. J. Gene Med. 1, 280-289.
Alameddine HS, Quantin B, Cartaud A,
Dehaupas M, Mandel JL, and Fardeau M (1994)
Expression of a recombinant dystrophin in mdx mice using adenovirus vector. Neuromusc. Disord. 4, 193-203.
Ascadi G, Jani A, Massie B, Simoneau M,
Holland P, Blaschuk K, and Karpati G (1994)
Cultured human myoblasts and myotubes show markedly different transducibility
by replication-defective adenovirus recombinants. Gene Ther. 3, 579-584.
Ascadi G, Lochmuller H, Jani A, Huard
J, Massie B, Prescott S, Simoneau M, Petrof BJ, and Karparti G (1996) Dystrophin expression in muscles
of mdx mice after adenovirus-mediated in vivo gene transfer. Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 129-140.
Athanasopoulos T, Fabb SA, Dickson JG (2000) Gene therapy vectors based on
adeno-associated virus: Characteristics and applications to acquired and
inherited diseases (Review). Int. J.
Mol. Med. 6, 363-375.
Bredt DS (1999) Knocking signalling out of the
dystrophin complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E89-E91.
Brenmen JE, Chao
DS, Xia H, Aldape K, and Bredt DS (1995)
Nitrogen-oxide synthase complexed with dystrophin and absent from
skeletal-muscle sarcolemma in Duchenne Muscular-Dystrophy. Cell 82, 743-752.
Caplen NJ, Higginbotham JN, Scheel JR,
Vahanian N, Yoshida Y, Hamada H, Blaese RM, and Ramsey WJ (1999) Adeno-retroviral chimeric viruses as in vivo transducing
agents. Gene Ther. 6, 454-459.
Chen HH, Mack LM, Kelly R, Ontell M,
Kochanek S, and Clemens PR (1997)
Persistence in muscle of an adenoviral vector that lacks all viral genes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 95,
1645-1650.
Clemens PR, Kochanek S, Sunada Y, Chan
S, Chen HH, Campbell KP, and Caskey CT (1996)
In vivo muscle gene transfer of full-length dystrophin with an adenoviral
vector that lacks all viral genes. Gene
Ther. 3, 965-72.
Costantini LC, Jacoby DR, Wang S,
Fraefel C, Breakefield XO, and Isacson O (1999)
Gene transfer to the nigrostriatal system by hybrid herpes simplex
virus/adeno-associated virus amplicon vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 10, 2527-2537.
Culver KW, Ram Z, Walbridge S, Ishii H,
Oldfield EH, and Blease RM (1992) In
vivo gene transfer with retroviral vector-producer cells for treatment of experimental
brain tumors. Science 256,
1550-1552.
Curran MA, Kaiser SM, Achacoso PL, and
Nolan GP (2000) Efficient
transduction of nondividing cells by optimized feline immunodeficiency virus
vectors. Mol. Ther. 1, 31-38.
Decrouy A, Renaud JM, Davis HL, Lunde
JA, Dickson G, and Jasmin BJ (1997)
Mini-dystrophin gene transfer in mdx4cv diaphragm muscle fibers increases
sarcolemmal stability. Gene Ther. 4,
401-408.
Duisit G, Salvetti A, Moullier P, and
Cosset FL (1999) Functional
characterization of adenoviral/retroviral chimeric vectors and their use for
efficient screening of retroviral producer cell lines. Hum. Gene Ther. 10, 189-200.
Dunckley MG, Wells DJ, Walsh FS, and
Dickson G (1993) Direct
retroviral-mediated transfer of a dystrophin minigene into mdx mouse muscle in
vivo. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 717-723.
Emery AE (1993) Duchenne muscular dystrophy - Meryon's disease. Neuromuscul. Disord. 3, 263-6.
England SB,
Nicholson LVB, Johnson MA, Forrest SM, Love DR, Zubrzyckagaarn EE, Bulman DE, Harris JB, Davies KE (1990) Very mild muscular-dystrophy
associated with the deletion of 46 % of dystrophin. Nature 343, 180-182.
Fassati A, Wells DJ, Serpente PAS,
Walsh FS, Brown SC, Strong PN, and Dickson G
(1997) Genetic correction of dystrophin deficiency and skeletal muscle
remodelling in adult mdx mouse via transplantation of retroviral producer
cells. J. Clin. Invest. 100,
620-628.
Fassati A, Wells DJ, Walsh F, and
Dickson G (1996) Transplantation of
retroviral producer cells for in vivo gene transfer into mouse skeletal muscle.
Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 595-602.
Fassati A, Wells DJ, Walsh FS, and
Dickson G (1995) Efficiency of in
vivo gene transfer using murine retroviral vectors is strain dependent in mice.
Hum. Gene Ther. 6, 1177-1183.
Feng M, Jackson WH, Goldman CK, Rancourt
C, Wang M, Dusing SK, Siegal G, and Curiel DT (1997) Stable in vivo gene transduction via a novel
adenoviral/retroviral chimeric vector. Nature
Biotech. 15, 866-870.
Ferrari G, Stornaiuolo A, and Mavilio F
(2001) Failure to correct murine
muscular dystrophy. Nature 411,
1014-1015.
Floyd SS, Clemens PR, Ontell MR,
Kochanek S, Day CS, Yang J, Haushka SD, Balkir R, Morgan J, Moreland MS, Feero
GW, Epperly M, and Huard J (1998) Ex
vivo gene transfer using adenovirus-mediated full-length dystrophin delivery to
dystrophic muscles. Gene Ther. 5,
19-30.
Fraefel C, Jacoby DR, Lage C,
Hilderbrand H, Chou JY, Alt FW, Breakefeild XO, and Majzoub JA (1997) Gene transfer into hepatocytes
mediated by helper virus-free HSV/AAV hybrid vectors. Mol. Med. 3, 813-825.
Grady RM, Grange
RW, Lau KS, Maimone MM, Michol MC, Stull JT, and Sanes JR (1999) Role for alpha-dystrobrevin in the pathogenesis of
dystrophin-dependent muscular dystrophies. Nat.
Cell Biol. 1, 215-220.
Gussoni E, Soneoka Y, Strickland CD,
Buzney EA, Khan MK, Flint AF, Kunkel LM, and Mulligan RC (1997) Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell
transplantation. Nature 401,
390-394.
Holzer GW, Mayrhofer JA,
Gritschenberger W, Domer F, and Falkner FG (1999) Poxviral/retroviral chimeric vectors allow cytoplasmic
production of transducing defective retroviral particles. Virology 253, 107-114.
Johnston JC, Gasmi M, Lim LE, Elder JH,
Yee JK, Jolly DJ, Campbell KP, Davidson BL, and Sauter SL (1999) Minimum requirements for efficient transduction of dividing
and nondividing cells by feline immunodeficiency virus vectors. J. Virol. 73, 4991-5000.
Johnston KM, Jacoby D, Pechan PA,
Fraefel C, Borghesani P, Schuback D, Dunn RJ, Smith FI, and Breakefield XO (1997) HSV/AAV hybrid amplicon vectors
extend transgene expression in human glioma cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 359-370.
Kafri T, Blomer U, Peterson DA, Gage
FH, and Verma IM (1997) Sustained
expression of genes delivered directly into liver and muscle by lentiviral
vectors. Nat. Genet. 17, 314-317.
Kafri T, Morgan D, Krahl T, Sarvetnick
N, Sherman L, and Verma I (1998)
Cellular immune response to adenoviral vector infected cells does not require
de novo viral gene expression: Implications for gene therapy. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 95,
11377-11382.
Kitamura M (1999) Bystander macrophages silence transgene expression driven by
the retroviral long terminal repeat. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 74-78.
Kristoffersen AK, Sindre H, Mandi Y,
Rollag H, and Degre M (1997) Effect
of adenovirus 2 on cellular gene activation in blood-derived monocytes and
macrophages. APMIS. 105, 402-409.
Li KJ and Garoff H (1998) Packaging of intron containing
genes into retrovirus vectors by alpha virus vectors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U S A. 95, 3650-3654.
Lieber A, Steinwaerder DS, Carlson CA,
and Kay MA (1999) Integrating
adenovirus-adeno-associated virus hybrid vectors devoid of all viral genes. J. Virol. 73, 9314-9324.
Lin X (1998) Construction of new retroviral producer cells from adenoviral
and retroviral vectors. Gene Ther. 5,
1251-1258.
Linden RM, Ward P, Giraud C, Winocour
E, and Berns KI (1996) Site-specific
integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 93, 11288-11294.
Lochmuller H, Petrof BJ, Pari G,
Larochelle N, Dodelet V, Wang Q, Allen C, Prescott S, Massie B, Nalbabtoglu J,
and Karpati G (1996) Transient
immunosuppression by FK506 permits a sustained high-level dystrophin expression
after adenovirus-mediated dystrophin minigene transfer to skeletal muscles of
adult dystrophic (mdx) mice. Gene Ther.
3, 706-716.
Parrish E, Peltekian E, Dickson G,
Epstein AL, and Garcia L (1999) Cell
engineering for muscle gene therapy: Extemporaneous production of retroviral
vector packaging macrophages using defective herpes simplex virus type 1
vectors harbouring gag, pol, env genes. Cytotechnology
30, 173-180.
Parrish EP, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Li ZL,
Vicart P, Paulin D, Dreyfus PA, Peschanski M, Harris AJ, and Garcia L (1996) Targeting widespread sites of
damage in dystrophic muscle: engrafted macrophages as potential shuttles. Gene Ther. 3, 13-20.
Petrof BJ, Lochmuller H, Massie B, Yang
L, Macmillan C, Zhao JE, Nalbantoglu J, and Karpati G (1996) Impairment of force generation after adenovirus-mediated gene
transfer to muscle is alleviated by adenoviral gene inactivation and host CD8+
T cell deficiency. Hum. Gene Ther.
7, 1813-1826.
Ponnazhagan S, Erikson D, Kearns WG,
Zhou SZ, Nahreini P, Wang XS, and Srivastava A (1997) Lack of site-specific integration of the recombinant
adeno-associated virus 2 genomes in human cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 275-284.
Pruchnic R, Cao BH, Peterson ZQQ, Xiao
X, Li J, Samulski RJ, Epperly M, and Huard J (2000) The use of adeno-associated virus to circumvent the
maturation-dependent viral transduction of muscle fibers. Hum. Gene Ther. 11, 521-536.
Quantin B, Perricaudet LD, Tajbakhsh S,
and Mandel JL (1992) Adenovirus as
an expression vector in muscle cells in vivo. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 89, 2581-2584.
Rafael JA, Sunada Y, Cole NM, Campbell
KP, Faulkner JA, and Chamberlain JS (1994)
Prevention of dystrophic pathology in mdx mice by a truncated dystrophin
isoform. Hum. Mol. Genet. 3,
1725-1733.
Ramsey WJ, Caplen NJ, Li Q,
Higginbotham JN, Shah M, and Blaese RM (1998)
Adenovirus vectors as transcomplementing templates for the production of replication
defective retroviral vectors. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 246, 912-919.
Recchia A, Parks RJ, Lamartina S,
Toniatti C, Pieroni L, Palombo F, Ciliberto G, Graham FL, Cortese R, La Monica
N, and Colloca S (1999)
Site-specific integration mediated by a hybrid adenovirus/adeno-associated
virus vector. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.
96, 2615-2620.
Reynolds PN, Feng M, and Curiel DT (1999) Chimeric viral vectors – the best
of both worlds? Mol. Med. Today 5,
25-31.
Roberts M, Patterson S, and Dickson G (2000) Novel strategies for the
treatment of DMD: evaluating the feasibility of using macrophages as
retrovirus-producing cells. Mol. Ther.
1, S331.
Roberts ML, Athanasopoulos T,
Pohlschmidt M, Duisit G, Cosset FL, and Dickson G (2001) Post-mitotic, differentiated myotubes efficiently produce
retroviral vector from adeno-retrovirus templates. Gene Ther. 8, 1580-1586.
Rydercook AS, Sicinski P, Thomas K,
Davies KE, Worton RG, Barnard EA, Darlison MG, and Barnard PJ (1988) Localization of the mdx mutation
within the mouse dystrophin gene. EMBO.
J. 7, 3017-3021.
Sakoda T, Kasahara N, Hamamori Y, and
Kedes L (1999) A high-titer
lentiviral production system mediates efficient transduction of differentiated
cells including beating cardiac myocytes. J.
Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 31, 2037-2047.
Seppen J, Barry SC, Harder B, and
Osborne WR (2001) Lentivirus
administration to rat muscle provides efficient sustained expression of
erythropoietin. Blood 98, 594-596.
Tan BT, Wu L, and Berk AJ (1999) An adenovirus-Epstein-Barr virus
hybrid vector that stably transforms cultured cells with high efficiency. J. Virol. 73, 7582-7589.
Torrente Y, Tremblay JP, Pisati F,
Belicchi M, Rossi B, Sironi M, Fortunato F, El Fahime M, D’Angelo MG, Caron NJ,
Constantin G, Paulin D, Scarlato G, and Bresolin N (2001) Intraarterial injection of muscle-derived CD34(+)Sca-1(+)
stem cells restores dystrophin in mdx mice. J. Cell Biol. 152, 335-348.
Ueno T, Matsumura H, Tanaka K, Iwasaki
T, Ueno I, Fujinaga K, Asada K, and Kato I (2000) Site-specific integration of a transgene mediated by a hybrid
adenovirus/adeno-associated virus vector using the Cre/loxP-expression
switching system. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 273, 473-478.
Van Deutekom JCT, Cao B, Pruchnic R,
Wickham TJ, Kovesdi I., and Huard J (1999)
Extended tropism of an adenoviral vector does not circumvent the
maturation-dependent transducibility of mouse skeletal muscle. J. Gene Med. 1, 393-399.
Vincent N, Ragot T, Gilgenkrantz H,
Couton D, Chafey P, Gregoire A, Briand P, Kaplan JC, Kahn A, and Perricaudet M
(1993) Long-term correction of mouse
dystrophic degeneration by adenovirus-mediated transfer of a minidystrophin
gene. Nature Genet. 5, 130-134.
Wang B, Li J, and
Xiao X (2000) Adeno-associated virus
vector carrying human minidystrophin genes effectively ameliorates muscular
dystrophy in mdx mouse model. Proc. Nat.
Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 13714-13719.
Yang L, Lochmuller H, Luo J, Massie B,
Nalbantoglu J, Karpati G, and Petrof BJ (1998)
Adenovirus-mediated dystrophin minigene transfer improves muscle strength in
adult dystrophic (MDX) mice. Gene Ther.
5, 369-379.
Yuasa K, Miyagoe Y, Yamamoto K,
Nabeshima Y, Dickson G, and Takeda S (1998)
Effective restoration of dystrophin-associated proteins in vivo by
adenovirus-mediated transfer of truncated dystrophin cDNAs. FEBS. Letts. 425, 329-336.
Zhang Y, Chirmule N, Gao GP, Qian R,
Croyle M, Joshi B, Tazelaar J, and Wilson JM (2001) Acute cytokine response to systemic adenoviral vectors in
mice is mediated by dendritic cells and macrophages. Mol. Ther. 3, 697-707.

Division
of Biochemistry, Royal Holloway - University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX,
United Kingdom,
Tel:
+44 (0)1784 443873, Fax: +44 (0)1784 434326,
e-mail:M.L.Roberts@rhul.ac.uk