Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 6,
159-167, 2001
Surface-shielded polycation-based systems targeting reporter and
therapeutic genes to distant tumors
Review Article
Ralf
Kircheis1*, Lionel Wightman1, Malgorzata Kursa1,
Birgit Smrekar1, Elinborg Ostermann1, and Ernst Wagner1,2
1Boehringer
Ingelheim Austria, Dr. Boehringer Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna, Austria
2Current
address: Pharmaceutical Biology - Biotechnology, Ludwig-Maximilians-
UniversitŠt MŸnchen, Butenandtstr. 5-13, D-81377 Munich, Germany
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Ralf Kircheis, MD, Ph.D., Cancer
Vaccines & Gene Therapy, Boehringer Ingelheim Austria GmbH Dr.
Boehringer-Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43-(1)-80105 2790, Fax:
+43-(1)-80105 2683; e-mail: ralf.kircheis@vie.boehringer-ingelheim.com
Key words: gene
therapy, tumor targeting, non-viral gene transfer, polyethylenimine, PEI,
polyplex, transferrin, tumor necrosis factor, TNFa
Abbreviations:
polyethylene
glycol, (PEG); polyethylenimine, (PEI); transferrin,
(Tf); transferrin-polyethylenimine, (Tf-PEI); tumor necrosis factor,
(TNFa)
Summary
We have developed surface-shielded
transferrin-polyethylenimine (Tf-PEI) - based gene delivery systems which are
able to target gene expression to distant tumors after systemic application in
murine models. For systemic in vivo application the biophysical parameters of
transfection complexes, such as particle size, stability, surface charge, and
modification with targeting ligand, were found to be critical for DNA
biodistribution, toxicity, and gene transfer efficacy. Two major mechanisms may
contribute to the tumor-specific targeting: active targeting via
receptor-mediated cell binding and passive targeting via shielding of the
surface charge of the complexes. Shielding reduces plasma protein and
erythrocyte binding, resulting in prolonged blood circulation and extravasation
of DNA complexes in areas of vascular leakiness of the tumor tissue. Shielding
of surface charges can be achieved by coating polycation/DNA complexes with
either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or by incorporating Tf ligand at high
densities. Systemic application of surface-shielded
transferrin-polyethylenimine-based DNA complexes coding for tumor necrosis
factor (TNFa) localized gene expression to distant tumors, resulting in pronounced
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and inhibition of tumor growth. TNFa activity was confined
to the tumor without systemic TNF-related toxicity.
I.
Introduction
Gene therapy has become an attractive
concept for a broad variety of biomedical applications. The potential of gene
therapy for directing the expression of therapeutic genes to the target cells
makes it particularly attractive for treatment of cancer. Multiple levels of
target specificity are attainable: by exploiting specific delivery mechanisms
to target the tumor (biochemical or physical targeting), specific intracellular
characteristics of the target cells (e.g. preferential targeting of
proliferating cells), controlled tissue-specific expression (transcriptional
targeting), and utilizing biological amplification mechanisms (e.g. during
transcription / translation, bystander effects, triggering immune effector
mechanism). However, the lack of effective and target-specific vectors is a
major bottleneck for somatic gene therapy to date. Non-viral vectors are increasingly
being utilized as gene delivery vehicles because of advantages such as
stability, low cost, and high flexibility regarding the size of the transgene
delivered. However, major limitations for non-viral gene delivery vectors
include unspecific binding to non-target tissues, inefficient uptake into the
target cells, limited release from endosomes, and inefficient import into the
nucleus of target cells.
Recently we have developed surface-shielded
transferrin-polyethylenimine
(Tf-PEI) - based gene delivery systems which are able to target gene expression
to distant tumors after systemic application in murine models (Kircheis
et al, 1999, 2001a,b). For target
specificity cell-binding ligands, such as transferrin, EGF, or antibodies, can
be coupled to polyethylenimine (PEI) (Kircheis
et al, 1997; Zanta et
al, 1997; Erbacher et al, 1999; Blessing et
al, 2001), resulting
in vectors that combine the intrinsic activities of PEI (Boussif et al, 1995) with specific receptor-mediated uptake
mechanism (Wagner et al, 1994). Furthermore, DNA biodistribution and gene transfer
efficacy after systemic
application in vivo is determined by
the biophysical parameters of transfection complexes, such as particle size,
stability and surface charge (Kircheis et al, 1999, 2001a). Shielding
of the transfection
complexes from unspecific interaction combined with active targeting mechanisms
resulted in specific uptake in tumors. Shielding the surface charge of
transfection complexes was achieved by coating polycation/DNA complexes with
polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Kircheis et al, 1999; Ogris et al, 1999) or by incorporating
Tf ligand at high densities (Kircheis et al, 2001a).
Surface-shielded
transferrin-polyethylenimine-based gene delivery systems were used in syngeneic
murine tumor models to deliver a therapeutic gene, coding for tumor necrosis
factor (TNFa). TNFa is a highly potent pleiotropic cytokine, and is well known
for its ability to induce hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and tumor regression (Old, 1985). However, the clinical application of
TNFa is hampered by its high systemic
toxicity (Beutler
et al, 1985). In contrast, systemic application of
surface-shielded Tf-PEI complexes with the TNFa gene resulted in pronounced hemorrhagic
tumor necrosis and inhibition of tumor growth without systemic TNF-related
toxicity due to the localization of the activity of the cytokine to the tumor.
These data indicate that targeted gene delivery to tumors may be an attractive
strategy applicable to highly active, yet, toxic molecules in cancer treatment.
II. Results
A. Ligand-polycation based
receptor-mediated gene transfer
Condensation of DNA by electrostatic
interactions with polycations is being used to protect DNA from degradation by
nucleases, resulting in formation of compact particles that can be taken up by
the cells via natural processes such as adsorptive endocytosis or phagocytosis.
Among the synthetic vectors, PEI shows particularly promising efficacy in
transfection in cell culture as well as in a variety of applications in vivo (Boussif et al, 1995;
Abdallah et al, 1996;
Goula et al, 1998). Beside its DNA condensing activity PEI has an intrinsic
endosomolytic activity mediating, by a Ôproton sponge mechanismÕ, the escape of
DNA from the endosomal department (Boussif et al, 1995; Kichler et
al, 2001).

Figure 1.
Ligand-polycation based receptor-mediated gene transfer
To combine the high gene transfer
efficacy of PEI/DNA complexes with the target-specific mechanism of
receptor-mediated uptake, we have incorporated cell-binding ligands (Kircheis et al, 1997; Blessing et
al, 2001), such as transferrin (Tf) or EGF into
the complex by chemical coupling to PEI.
Binding of the Tf ligand-coated DNA
complexes to the Tf receptor on the target cells, followed by endocytosis into
vesicles, escape of the DNA from the endosomal compartment, and nuclear entry
are critical steps for efficient transfection (Figure 1). The efficacy of these intracellular steps is influenced
by the cell-binding ligand, the type of the polycationic carrier, and the
physical characteristics such as the size of the transfection complex. Large
particles (from several hundred nm up to mm) generated at physiological salt concentrations were found to
have higher transfection efficacy compared to small sized complexes (~50nm) formed
in salt-free buffers (Ogris et
al, 1998).
Particle size is also dependent on the DNA (and polycation) concentration
during complex formation and on polycation to DNA ratio. Compact particles of
small size are usually obtained at higher polycation/DNA ratios (i.e. N/P
ratios), resulting in complexes with a strong net positive charge, i.e. high
zeta-potential. At neutrality polycation/DNA complexes have the tendency for
particle aggregation. The requirement to have excessive positive charge for
efficient DNA complexation, however, can cause major problems particularly for in vivo applications.
B. Systemic application in vivo
Compared to cell culture applications
gene delivery in vivo has to overcome
a variety of additional problems. Passing blood circulation and organs such as
liver and spleen which are specialized in removal of foreign particles pose
obstacles particularly for systemic application of transfection complexes.
Furthermore, the particles have to be small enough to leave the vascular system
and to diffuse through the tissues to reach their target (Figure 2).
Another major problem are unspecific
interactions with blood components, extracellular matrix and non-target cells.
Positively charged polycation/DNA complexes were found to aggregate in physiological
salt, to interact with components of the coagulation and complement systems,
and to cause aggregation of erythrocytes which can result in occlusion of
capillaries e.g. in the lungs, leading to lung embolism (Plank et al, 1996; Ogris et al, 1999; Kircheis and Wagner, 2000). Furthermore, recognition and uptake by cells of the
reticuloendothelial system will cause rapid removal from the circulation (Figure 3).
We have shown that unspecific interaction
with plasma components or erythrocytes can be prevented by shielding the
surface of transfection particles by covalent modification with PEG without
affecting the target-specific transferrin ligand - receptor interactions (Kircheis
et al, 1999; Ogris et al, 1999) (Figure 4). More recently we have employed an alternative strategy
for masking the surface charge of DNA complexes. It was found that transferrin
in the complex not only can serve as a cell-binding ligand but also mediate
efficient shielding of the surface charge. In fact, incorporation of Tf at
higher densities into the complex was shown to shield the positive surface
charge of PEI/DNA complexes formed with low molecular weight PEIs (e.g. 25kDa,
22kDa) also in the absence of PEGylation (Kircheis et al, 2001a).

Figure 2.
Multiple barriers for polycation/DNA complexes for targeted gene expression
following systemic in vivo application

Figure 3.
Unspecific interactions of positively charged polycation/DNA complexes

Figure 4.
Shielding transfection complexes from non-specific interactions and
incorporation of targeting mechanisms DNA is condensed into compact positively charged
particles by excessive polycation. Incorporation of cell-binding ligands
provides the possibility for specific binding to the target cells. At the same
time also non-specific interactions with blood components and non-target cells
are possible. Non-specific interactions can be blocked by shielding the surface
of the transfection complexes either by covalent coupling of polyethylene
glycol (PEG) or by incorporating the ligand transferrin at sufficiently high
densities.
Shielding of the surface charge of
PEI/DNA complexes, generating particles with a near neutral zeta-potential,
blocks the aggregation of erythrocyte. In contrast, non-shielded complexes
induce massive erythrocyte aggregation (Figure
5). Systemic application of non-shielded luciferase reporter gene complexes
into tumor-bearing mice resulted in high gene expression in the lungs, lower
expression in other organs, such as the heart and liver, but was often
accompanied by considerable toxicity Particularly when high molecular
PEI800/DNA complexes were used approximately half of the animals died with
signs of lung embolism (Kircheis et al, 1999). Complexes using the lower molecular
weight PEIs (e.g. 25kDa or 22kDa) showed generally lower toxicity, particularly
when the linear PEI22 was used (Goula et
al, 1998; Wightman et al, 2001). With all PEIs lung expression was
prominent with varying expression levels in other major organs or the tumor. In
contrast Tf-PEI/DNA complexes shielded either by PEG or high densitiy Tf
resulted in preferable reporter gene expression in the tumor. Furthermore,
expression in the lungs or in the other organs was dramatically reduced (Figure 6). Shielding of the
transfection complexes from unspecific interactions was shown to lead to longer
circulation times in the blood (Ogris et
al, 1999)
resulting in extravasation in areas of higher vascular permeability such as
tumors (passive targeting) (Gerlowski and Jain, 1986; Kircheis and
Wagner, 2000). Further studies on the biodistribution
of transfection complexes showed a significant accumulation of shielded
transfection complex in the tumor compared to non-shielded complexes (Kircheis
et al, 1999; 2001b). Beside
the passive targeting obviously also active targeting mechanisms such as
enhanced uptake by Tf-receptor expressing (Wagner et al, 1994;
Kircheis et al, 1997) and highly proliferating tumor cells (Brunner et al, 2000) are contibuting to the preferential
gene expression in the tumor.
C. Tumor-targeted gene delivery of TNFa
We were particularly interested in
applying this tumor-targeted gene delivery system for delivering a highly
active effector molecule TNFa. TNFa is a cytokine with pronounced antitumor activity (Old, 1985). It is known to act on a broad variety
of cells, particularly damaging the vascular system of the tumor. The problem
with conventional TNFa rotein therapy has been its high
systemic toxicity (Beutler et al, 1985). Since both, antitumor activity and
systemic toxicity seem to share common pathophysiological mechanisms, the only
possibility to separate the antitumor activity from its systemic toxicity is to
localize TNFa ctivity to the tumor.

Figure 5.
Shielding of the surface charge of transfection complexes blocks aggregation of
erythrocytes.Non-shielded positively charged polycation/DNA complexes induce
aggregation of erythrocytes. Shielding of the surface charge by incorporation
of the ligand transferrin at high densities in the complex blocks the aggregation
of erythrocytes.

Figure 6.
Reporter gene expression after systemic
gene delivery into tumor-bearing mice. Positively charged PEI/DNA complexes
(a), or high density transferrin
incorporation (b), or
charge-shielded Tf-PEI/DNA complexes after PEGylation (c) were injected into the tail vein of A/J mice bearing
subcutaneously growing Neuro2a tumors. Zeta potential of the complexes was
measured using a Malvern Zetasizer and is shown in mV. Gene expression in the
major organs and tumor was measured by luciferase assay 24 h after application.
Mean values ±
SEM are shown.
Surface-shielded transfection complexes containing an expression
plasmid coding for murine TNFa were repeatedly applied systemically
into the tail vein of BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneously growing MethA
fibrosarcoma on their flank. After a few days the majority of the animals
developed pronounced hemorrhagic tumor necrosis, which is one of the hallmarks
of the antitumor activity of TNFa Figure 7). Moreover,
hemorrhagic necrosis was focused specifically to the tumor, and no systemic
toxicity was seen.
Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis
was associated by visible inhibition of tumor growth. In approximately 60% of
the TNFa treated animals finally a complete tumor
regression was seen (Figure 7).
These animals were also protected from subsequent tumor rechallenge. In
untreated animals or control animals, which received similar transfection
complexes containing the b-alactosidase gene, no hemorrhagic
necrosis and only occationally sponteneous tumor regressions were observed.TNFa-specific induction of hemorrhagic tumor
necrosis was also demonstrated in another tumor model, the Neuro2a
neuroblastoma. Surface-shielded transfection complexes coding for TNFa were systemically applied into Neuro2a
bearing A/J mice, resulting in significant TNFa gene expression (as measured by ELISA) within the tumor,
without detectable serum levels (data not shown). After one week of treatment
85% of the TNFa treated animals developed hemorrhagic
tumor necrosis while in animals without treatment or treated with similar
transfection complexes containing the b-galactosidase reporter gene or the non-expressing pSP65 plasmid
tumor necrosis was found only in 5%, 16%, or 12%, respectively. Induction of
hemorrhagic tumor necrosis

Figure 7.
Tumor-targeted gene delivery of TNFa leads to hemorrhagic
tumor necrosis and tumor regression. Surface-shielded transfection complexes
containing an expression plasmid coding for murine TNFa
were repeatedly applied systemically into the tail vein of BALB/c mice bearing
subcutaneously growing MethA fibrosarcoma on their flank. 60% of the animals
developed pronounced hemorrhagic tumor necrosis (upper left), no systemic
toxicity was seen. Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis was associated by
inhibition of tumor growth resulting in more than half of the TNFa
treated animals in complete tumor regression (upper right). Control animals
treated with similar transfection complexes containing the b-galactosidase
gene did not develop hemorrhagic tumor necrosis (lower panel).

Figure 8.
TNFa specific
induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis and inhibition in tumor growth in the
Neuro2a tumor model. Surface-shielded
transfection complexes coding for TNFa
were systemically applied into Neuro2a bearing A/J mice. After one week of
treatment 85% of the TNFa
treated animals developed hemorrhagic tumor necrosis in contrast to animals
treated with similar transfection complexes having the b-galactosidase
reporter gene. Induction of hemorrhagic tumor necrosis resulted in a
significant inhibition of tumor growth in the TNFa
treated animals as compared to the control groups. Mean values ±
SEM of groups of 6 animals are shown.
resulted in a significant inhibition of
tumor growth in the TNFa treated animals as compared to the
control groups (Figure 8).
A therapeutically applicable non-viral
gene delivery vector should comprise a number of essential functions including
condensation and protection of DNA, uptake into the target cells, and
expression of the desired gene at the target site. Incorporation of
cell-binding ligands, endosomal release enhancers, and nuclear localization
signals can enable specific and efficient gene delivery and expression. For in vivo application the physical and
colloidal parameters of transfection complexes, such as particle size, surface
charge, and stability are critical factors which determine DNA biodistribution
and gene expression. Knowing these parameters and their complex interplay will
provide the basis for the rational design of gene delivery systems applicable
for in vivo application. Finally,
shielding transfection complexes from unspecific interactions, incorporation of
active cell targeting mechanisms, combined with transcriptional targeting by using
tissue-specific promotors or hypoxia-responsive elements (Dachs et al, 1997) should ensure that
the gene of interest is only expressed at the desired target site.
The presented data using reporter and
therapeutic genes indicate that targeted gene delivery to tumors may be an
attractive strategy applicable to highly active, yet toxic molecules such as
TNFa in cancer treatment.
References
Abdallah B,
Hassan A, Benoist C, Goula D, Behr JP, and Demeneix BA (1996) A powerful nonviral vector for in vivo gene transfer into the
adult mammalian brain: polyethylenimine. Hum
Gene Ther 7, 1947-1954.
Beutler B,
Milsark IW, and Cerami A (1985)
Passive immunization against Cachectin/Tumor Necrosis Factor protects mice from
lethal effect of endotoxin. Science
229, 869-871.
Blessing T,
Kursa M, Holzhauser R, Kircheis R, and Wagner E (2001) Different strategies for formation of PEGylated
EGF-conjugated PEI/DNA complexes for targeted gene delivery. Bioconjugate Chem 12, 529-537.
Boussif O,
Lezoualc'h F, Zanta MA, Mergny MD, Scherman D, Demeneix B, and Behr JP (1995) A versatile vector for gene and
oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo - polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 7297-7301.
Brunner S,
Sauer T, Carotta S, Cotton M, Saltik M, and Wagner E (2000) Cell cycle dependence of gene transfer by lipoplex, polyplex
and recombinant adenovirus. Gene Ther 7, 401-407.
Dachs GU,
Patterson AV, Firth JD, Ratcliffe PJ, Townsend KMS, Stratford IJ, and Harris AL
(1997) Targeting gene expression to
hypoxic tumor cells. Nature Med 3, 515-520.
Erbacher P,
Remy JS, and Behr JP (1999) Gene
transfer with synthetic virus-like particles via the integrin-mediated
endocytosis pathway. Gene Ther 6, 138-145.
Gerlowski
LE, and Jain RK (1986) Microvascular
permeability of normal and neoplastic tissue. Microvasc Res 31,
288-305.
Goula D,
Benoist C, Mantero S, Merlo G, Levi G, and Demeneix BA (1998) Polyethylenimine-based intravenous delivery of transgenes to
mouse lung. Gene Ther 5, 1291-1295.
Kichler A,
Leborgne C, Coeytaux E, and Danos O (2001)
Polyethylenimine-mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study. J Gene Med 3, 135-144.
Kircheis R
and Wagner E (2000) Polycation/DNA
complexes for in vivo gene delivery. Gene
Therapy and Regulation 1, 95-114.
Kircheis R,
Blessing T, Wightman L, Brunner S, and Wagner E (2001) Tumor targeting with surface-shielded ligand-polycation DNA
complexes. J Controlled Rel 72,
165-170.
Kircheis R,
Kichler A, Wallner G, Kursa M, Ogris M, Felzmann T, Buchberger M, and Wagner E
(1997) Coupling of cell-binding
ligands to polyethylenimine for targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther 4, 409-418.
Kircheis R,
SchŸller S, Brunner S, Ogris M, Heider KH, Zauner W, and Wagner, E (1999) Polycation-based DNA complexes
for tumor-targeted gene delivery in vivo. J
Gene Medicine 1, 111-120.
Kircheis R,
Wightman L, Schreiber A, Robitza B, Ršssler V, Kursa M, and Wagner E (2001) Polyethylenimine/DNA complexes
shielded by transferrin target gene expression to tumors after systemic
application. Gene Ther 8, 28-40.
Ogris M, Brunner
S, SchŸller S, Kircheis R, and Wagner E (1999)
PEGylated DNA/Transferrin-PEI complexes: Reduced interaction with blood
components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene
delivery. Gene Ther 6, 595-605.
Ogris M,
Steinlein P, Kursa M, Mechtler K, Kircheis R, and Wagner E (1998) The size of DNA/transferrin-PEI
complexes is an important factor for gene expression in cultured cells. Gene Ther 5, 1425-1433.
Old LJ (1985) Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF).
Science 230, 630-632.
Plank C,
Mechtler K, Szoka F, and Wagner E (1996)
Activation of the complement system by synthetic DNA complexes: A potential
barrier for intravenous gene delivery. Hum
Gene Ther 7, 1437-1446.
Wagner E,
Curiel D, Cotten M (1994) Delivery
of drugs, proteins and genes into cells using transferrin as a ligand for
receptor-mediated endocytosis. Adv Drug
Del Rev 14, 113-136.
Wightman L,
Kircheis R, Roessler V, Carotta S, Ruzicka R, Kursa M, and Wagner E (2001) Different behavior of branched
and linear polyethylenimine for gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. J Gene Med 3, 362-372.
Zanta MA,
Boussif O, Adib A, and Behr JP (1997)
In vitro gene delivery to hepatocytes with galactosylated polyethylenimine. Bioconjugate Chem 8, 841-844
.