Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 6,
183-194, 2001
Integrating vector and stem cell-based strategies for
gene therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Review Article
Michael L. Roberts1*, Steve Patterson2, and George Dickson1
1Centre for Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological
Sciences, Royal Holloway-University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United
Kingdom.
2Department of Immunology, Imperial College of
Science, Technology and Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10
9NH.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Michael L. Roberts, Division of Biochemistry, Royal Holloway -
University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom, Tel: +44 (0)1784
443873, Fax: +44 (0)1784 434326, e-mail:M.L.Roberts@rhul.ac.uk
Key words: muscular dystrophy, hybrid virus,
adenovirus, retrovirus, macrophage, and stem cell
Abbreviations: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy,
(DMD); green fluorescent protein, (GFP); herpes simplex virus type 1, (HSV-1);
Tibialis Anterior, (TA)
Summary
We review novel gene
transfer strategies proposed to be suitable for the treatment Duchenne Muscular
Dystrophy (DMD): use of hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors to stably replace
dystrophin ultimately in patients lacking this gene and the potential
intravenous application of stem cells and monocytes for targeted gene transfer.
We discuss the limitations of current vector technology and demonstrate the
need for continual evolution of vector design that is required before gene
therapy of complex monogenic diseases such as DMD becomes a reality.
I.
Introduction
DMD is a debilitating X-linked muscle wasting disease
affecting 1 in 3500 newborn boys, about one-third of these cases arise from
spontaneous mutations (Emery, 1993). The dystrophin gene is one of the largest
known spanning some 2.5 Mb (hence the high rate of spontaneous mutations) and
comprises 79 exons spliced into a 14 kb cDNA. The encoded protein has a
molecular mass of 427 kDa and is located in the sarcolemmal membrane (Figure 1). The primary functions of dystrophin are the maintenance of
myofibre integrity and the mediation of intracellular signal transduction (Brenment et al, 1995; Grady et al, 1999; Bredt,
1999). The N-terminus of dystrophin binds actin, anchoring the protein
to the intracellular matrix, whereas the C-terminus binds to the Dystrophin
Associated Glycoprotein (DAG) complex, thought to be involved in signalling.
The DAG complex in turn spans the sarcolemmal membrane binding the basal lamina
and forms the link to the extracellular matrix. The intervening region is made
up of actin-like rod domains and hinge regions that serve as a buffer during
muscle contraction. In the absence of dystrophin muscle fibres are
disorganised, degenerate and after several cycles of regeneration are replaced
by fatty tissue resulting in loss of contractile strength. There are a number
mouse models available for this disease, but the most commonly used is the
naturally occurring mdx mouse, which
contains a point mutation on exon 23 encoding a stop codon resulting in the
termination of gene expression (Rydercook et al, 1988). It is the scope of this
review to discuss some of the evolving genetic therapeutic techniques that may
be applicable to the treatment of this otherwise incurable disease.
II. Current viral-based gene therapy of DMD
Due to its large size it is difficult to construct viral
vectors expressing the full-length dystrophin gene. However, there are
truncated forms available, lacking some of the rod and hinge regions (England
et al, 1990; Yuasa et al, 1998, Wang and Xiao, 2000). The most

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the
dystrophin associated glycoprotein complex. Dystrophin confers structural
integrity upon muscle fibres by linking the surrounding extracellular matrix to
the cytoskeleton via the dystrophin associated glycoprotein complex. The long
intervening region comprising of rod and hinge repeat regions absorbs stress
induced during muscle contraction
widely
used is mini-dystrophin (6.3 kb) isolated from a patient suffering from Becker
Muscular Dystrophy (a mild form of DMD) (England et al, 1990). Overexpression
of this mini-gene has been shown to restore expression of the DAG complex at
the sarcolemma (Vincent et al, 1993; Rafael et al, 1994), reduce the extent
muscle degeneration (Vincent et al, 1993; Decrouy et al, 1997), maintain
myofibre integrity (Decrouy et al, 1997) and increase the force generating capacity
of dystrophic muscle (Yang et al, 1998). In recent years shorter
micro-dystrophin constructs ranging from 3.7-4.5kb have been developed and
shown to provide a few of these therapeutic benefits (Yuasa et al, 1998; Wang
and Xiao, 2000). A number of the current viral vectors incorporating
full-length and truncated dystrophin genes in their design with potential
application for the treatment of DMD are listed below.
(a) Adenovirus. Recombinant viral vectors based on
the adenovirus are the most extensively used vectors for gene transfer in
skeletal muscle (Quantin et al, 1992; Alameddine et al, 1994; Ascadi et al,
1996; Clemens et al, 1996; Petrof et al, 1996; Floyd et al, 1998; Yuasa et al,
1998; van Deutekom et al, 1999). However, first generation adenoviral-mediated
mini-dystrophin expression in the muscle is short-term in nature, only lasting
up to two months post-injection (Ascadi et al, 1996), although this can be
extended by treatment with FK506 (Lochmuller et al, 1996). It is generally
accepted that adenoviral-mediated expression elicits a powerful cytotoxic
T-cell response resulting in the clearance of transduced fibres and a reduction
in the force generating capacity of the muscle (Lochmuller et al, 1996, Petrof
et al, 1996). Moreover, first and second generation vectors are limited in that
they are only able to accommodate the 6.3kb mini-dystrophin construct with a
simple promoter/enhancer element. However, their ease of use, ability to
replicate to high titres in complementing cell lines and high infectivity of a
number of cell types has led to the further development of this vector. Newer
generations of adenoviral vectors have all viral genes deleted and comprise
only the cis elements (ITRs) required
for replication with the packaging signal and a stuffer fragment of DNA (Ascadi
et al, 1996; Clemens et al, 1996; Chen et al, 1997; Balkir et al, 1998). These
vectors have the capacity to express the full-length dystrophin gene driven by
complex muscle specific promoters and a second reporter gene (Chen et al,
1997). Development of third generation vectors has led to a marked improvement
in the duration of transgene expression in
vivo due to their ability to evade the immune response (Chen et al, 1997).
Although these recent developments in adenoviral vectorology have been
promising this vector is not well suited to DMD because its genome is
maintained episomally. As the vector is non-integrating it is likely the
therapeutic gene would be lost during pathological turnover of muscle cells in
dystrophic tissue, notwithstanding the stability of mature muscle fibres
expressing dystrophin (Vincent et al, 1993).
(b) Adeno-Associated Virus. Vectors based on this
virus hold great promise for gene therapy of a number of diseases where the
defective gene is relatively small. In its wild-type form the virus is
non-pathogenic and integrates at a specific site within chromosome 19 (Linden
et al, 1996). However, rep-deleted
recombinant AAV vectors do not integrate into this specific region (Ponnazhagan
et al, 1997). In order to solve this problem hybrid AAV/Adenoviral (Lieber et
al, 1999; Recchia et al, 1999; Ueno et al, 2000) and AAV/Herpes virus (Fraefel
et al, 1997; Johnston et al, 1997; Costantini et al, 1999) vectors have been
constructed to provide the rep gene in trans. Interestingly, the long-term
gene expression obtainable from AAV is not associated with a deleterious immune
response making them ideal vectors to express small heterologous secreted
proteins, e.g. ApoE3 and clotting Factor IX, using skeletal muscle as an
expression platform (Athanasopoulos et al, 2000). Although AAV vectors are
efficient at infecting both mature and immature muscle (Pruchnic et al, 2000),
their small size is a major drawback for the treatment of DMD. The maximum
insert capacity is only 5.0 kb thus restricting the type of gene that can be
inserted to synthetic micro-dystrophin constructs whose application to the
treatment of DMD is expected to be limited (Yuasa et al, 1998).
(c) Retrovirus. During the life cycle of the
retrovirus its genome integrates into the infected cell subsequent to cell
division. As such retroviral vectors hold great promise for the treatment of
DMD due to the capacity of degenerated muscle tissue to regenerate, a process
mediated by muscle satellite stem cells (Fassati et al, 1995). However,
injection of neat retroviral suspensions into dystrophic muscle is not an
efficient means of delivery because the administration of low viral titres
achievable during the vector preparation stage is insufficient to transduce the
relatively low proportion of dividing myoblasts in dystrophic tissue (Fassati
et al, 1995). This can be overcome by implanting retroviral producer cells into
the target muscle resulting in efficient stable transduction of fibres provided
muscle degeneration is induced (Fassati et al, 1996), and has even been shown
to be an efficient means of introducing mini-dystrophin into dystrophic tissue
for long-term expression (Dunckley et al, 1993; Fassati et al, 1997). However,
there are major safety limitations in implanting such a cell line into patients
considering the severe inflammatory response and formation of palpable tumours
derived from producer cells observed in mdx
mice treated in this manner (Fassati et al, 1996).
(d) Lentivirus. Lentiviral vectors have two distinct
advantages over retroviral vectors; firstly, they are able to stably transduce
non-dividing cells and secondly, they can be produced to much higher titres
enabling them to be efficiently applied in
vivo (Sakoda et al, 1999). A number of researchers have shown that
lentiviral vector can mediate expression of transgene in skeletal, cardiac and
smooth muscle cells in vivo for up to
one year with minimal cytotoxicity (Kafri et al, 1997; Sakoda et al, 1999;
Seppen et al, 2001). Despite these studies the application of lentiviral
vectors to muscle-related disease has not occurred at the rate one would
anticipate. This is likely a consequence of concerns over safety as most
current vectors are based on Human Immunodeficiency Virus. This scenario is likely
to change as lentiviral vector technology evolves into systems based on forms
of the virus that are restricted to productive life cycles in other species.
Indeed vectors based on Feline Immunodeficiency Virus have now been shown to
efficiently transduce a number of human cell types (Johnson et al, 1999; Curren
et al, 2000) and even hamster skeletal muscle (Johnson et al, 1999). If these
studies can be extended into human skeletal muscle then there may be a
significant future for lentiviral-mediated gene therapy of DMD.
(e) Herpesvirus. Vectors based on the herpes simplex
virus type 1 (HSV-1) represent a potentially useful system for the treatment of
DMD. The virus is able to accommodate up to 30 kb of heterologous DNA, making
it an ideal vector to express full-length dystrophin. Indeed, replication
defective HSV-1 vectors with single and triple mutations in the immediate early
genes have been shown to efficiently deliver both mini- and full length
dystrophin to muscle fibres in vivo
(Akkaraju et al, 1999), although the long-term efficacy of HSV-1-mediated gene
transfer is yet to be examined. Given the well-established link to cytotoxicity
further disabled HSV-1 vectors may have to be developed in order to obtain
prolonged expression.
Each of the vectors listed above
have features that are advantageous to gene therapy but no one comprises all
the elements required for an ideal gene transfer vector e.g. large insert
capacity, capability to evade the immune response, ability to integrate safely
into the host genome and with minimum toxicity to target cells. In order to
address this issue a number of researchers have developed hybrid viral vectors.
These include gene delivery systems based on Adenovirus/Retrovirus (Feng et al,
1997; Lin, 1998; Ramsey et al, 1998; Caplen et al, 1999; Duisit et al, 1999;
Roberts et al, 2001), Adeno-Associated Virus/Herpes Simplex Virus (Fraefel et
al, 1997; Johnston et al, 1997; Costantini et al, 1999),
Adenovirus/Adeno-Associated Virus (Recchia et al, 1999; Lieber et al, 1999; Ueno
et al, 2000), Semliki Forest Virus/Retrovirus (Li and Garoff, 2001),
Epstein-Barr virus/Retrovirus (Tan et al, 1999), Herpes Simplex
Virus/Retrovirus (Parrish et al, 1999), and Poxvirus/Retrovirus (Holzer et al,
1999). The hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system may be particularly applicable
to the treatment of DMD. Both dividing and non-dividing muscle cells are
efficiently infected with adenoviral vectors and the retrovirus confers an
integrative capacity to transduced cells (Reynolds et al, 1999). Production of
functional retroviral vector using this hybrid system is a two-step process;
target cells are infected with adenoviruses expressing retrovirus structural
genes and proviral sequences. Infected cells release functional retroviral
vector, which then tranduces neighbouring cells, resulting in the stable
integration of the therapeutic gene (Figure
2). Using adenovirus templates to
produce retroviral vector in this manner offers an opportunity to produce
retroviral vector in situ, thus
reducing complement-mediated lysis and increasing the efficiency

Figure 2. Hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system. Putative
producer cells are infected with adenoviral vectors expressing the retroviral
genome (AdLXIN), Gag-Pol (Adgagpol) and amphitrophic envelope protein
(Ad10A1env). The infected cells assemble retroviral vector, which is released
into the surrounding environment and transduces neighbouring cells. The
proviral genome integrates during cell division creating a stable cell line
expressing therapeutic transgene.
of
retroviral vector transduction at the target site. Vectors constructed using
this approach have already been used in two rodent models of cancer and shown
to efficiently transduce rapidly dividing cancer cells (Feng et al, 1997;
Caplen et al, 1998). One aspect of DMD pathology makes it an ideal target for gene therapy by in situ delivery of retroviral vector.
Muscle fibres not expressing dystrophin degenerate and are subsequently
replaced by proliferating myoblast stem cells during regeneration. If existing
muscle fibres were allowed to act as a platform for retroviral production then
regenerating myoblasts could be transduced by newly produced retroviral vector
in the surrounding milieu.
III. Novel strategies for the treatment of DMD
A. Muscle as a platform for retroviral vector
production
Proliferating myoblasts and mature
differentiated myotubes have been shown to act as efficient retroviral producer
cells in vitro when using hybrid
adeno-retroviral vectors (Figure 3;
Roberts et al, 2001a). The most efficient hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system
comprises three adenoviral vectors expressing retroviral components; Adgag-pol,
Ad10A1env and AdLXIN (adenoviral vector encoding retroviral genome with gene of
interest). The triple vector system has been shown to be a more efficient means
of producing retroviral vector when compared to the two vector system, where gag, pol
and env are expressed from one
adenoviral vector (Lin, 1998, Roberts et al, 2001a). Myoblasts are able to
generate retroviral vector titres of 5x104 cfu/ml after 48 hours,
which drops significantly after a couple of days. Interestingly, post-mitotic
myotubes generate higher titres of retroviral vector (up to 3x105
cfu/ml) and production from these mature muscle cells does not drop over time
(Roberts et al, 2001a). This would suggest that post-mitotic cells are more
efficient at sustained production of retroviral vectors compared to dividing
cells. This postulation was confirmed when cell division was inhibited in
immature cultures of myotubes proposed to contain a higher proportion of
myoblasts as an increase in retroviral vector production was observed (Roberts
et al, 2001a). It is likely that proliferating myoblasts sequester retroviral
vector subsequent to its production resulting in the generation of lower levels
of vector for harvesting. Moreover, as the adenovirus is episomal, during
proliferation of the producer cell all the components required for retroviral
vector production are lost, thus over
Adenoviral
Vector Only Hybrid
Adeno-Retroviral


Figure 3. Cultures of myoblasts and myotubes produce
retroviral vector. Proliferating immature myoblasts and post-mitotic
differentiated myoblasts were infected with adenoviral vector alone or with the
hybrid adeno-retroviral system expressing GFP. After two days medium was
harvested from infected myocytes and used to transduce semi-confluent cultures
of NIH 3T3 cells. One day subsequent to transduction geneticin was added and
the transduced 3T3 cells were cultured for several weeks. Only NIH 3T3 cells
treated with medium isolated from hybrid adeno-retroviral infected myoblasts
and myotubes survived in the presence of geneticin, thus indicating the
successful production of retroviral vector.
time
fewer myoblasts will contain the elements required for retroviral vector
production. These observations suggested that mature skeletal muscle might
serve as an efficient long-term production platform for retroviral vector
production given that the majority of cells in the muscle are post-mitotic
myofibres.
The ability of muscle cells in vitro to produce relatively high titres of retroviral vector holds great promise for the gene therapy of DMD. Particularly since these results have recently been reproduced in vivo. In a recent study Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle from mdx mice was injected with the adeno-retroviral vector system expressing the LacZ gene (Roberts et al, submitted). Retroviral vector production was allowed to occur for one week and primary muscle cultures were prepared from the infected tissue. After the primary myoblast cultures had fused to form myotubes LacZ expression was analysed revealing that colonies of transduced myotubes only formed in cultures isolated from TA muscles infected with all the components required to make a retroviral vector (Roberts et al, submitted). Moreover, there was a ten-fold increase in the overall number of cells expressing b-galactosidase. We then examined the effect of retroviral production on the overall number of myofibres expressing LacZ in a TA muscle. After one week in normal mdx mice,retroviral vector production led to a two-fold increase in the number of myofibres expressing LacZ (Roberts et al, submitted). However, after four weeks the number of fibres expressing LacZ had fallen significantly suggesting an immune response to vector and transgene sequences had resulted in the destruction of transduced fibres (Roberts et al, submitted). Similar analysis in immunodeficient nude mdx mice revealed that by allowing the TA to act as a factory of retroviral vector production for four weeks there was a five-fold increase in the total number of LacZ-expressing myofibres (Roberts et al, submitted). These data suggest that provided muscle regeneration is induced, the hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system may be a good way to stably transduce skeletal muscle provided the issues of adenoviral-mediated immunogenicity and retroviral promoter shutdown are addressed.
The hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system has also been used
to slow the progression of muscular dystrophy in mdx mice. Neonates treated with hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors
comprising a 3.7kb micro-dystrophin construct expressed the therapeutic
transgene throughout most of the treated muscle (Figure 4). This efficient micro-dystrophin expression resulted in
the restoration of components of the DAG complex (b-dystroglycan, a-sarcoglycan
and b-sarcoglycan) that would otherwise
be absent in dystrophic tissue (Roberts et al, submitted). Moreover, expression
of micro-dystrophin decreased the total number of degenerating myofibres in the
TA muscle of mdx mice. Taken with the
data indicating restoration of the DAG complex, it is likely that expression of
micro-dystrophin from hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors partially corrects the
dystrophic phenotype. Moreover, the authors developed a novel nested PCR method
to monitor retroviral integration (Figure
5). By using this procedure a specific
product indicative of integration was detected only in animals injected with
all the components required to produce retroviral vector, indicating that LTR
duplication had occurred and the retroviral provirus had integrated into the
muscle cell genome (Roberts et al, submitted).

Figure 4. Adeno-retroviral-mediated expression of
microdystrophin in muscle. Muscle injected with components required for the
production of retroviral vector expressing micro-dystrophin (lower section) or
uninjected (upper section) and stained with antibody against the C-terminus of
dystrophin. Note the efficient expression of the micro-dystrophin construct
localises to the sarcolemmal membrane conferring structural integrity to the
muscle.
B. Strategies Based on Cell-Mediated Gene Transfer
As an alternative to viral vector-based strategies it
has been proposed that intravenous transplantation of bone marrow stem cells
from healthy individuals may serve to act as a stable source of
dystrophin-expressing muscle satellite stem cells provided sufficient numbers
of cells locate to the muscle (Gussoni et al, 1999). Intravenous
transplantation of whole bone marrow, haematopoietic and muscle-derived stem
cells from wild-type C57BL/10 mice can reconstitute lethally irradiated mdx recipients with all myeloid cell
lineages. Moreover, up to 10% of muscle fibres from the TA muscle in recipient
mice were found to express dystrophin derived from donors after three months
(Gussoni et al, 1999). In a separate study a similar level of dystrophin
expression (12%) in mdx mice
intra-arterially transplanted with muscle-derived cells was only shown to occur
subsequent to severe muscle damage in muscle groups near the injected artery
(Torrente et al, 2001). Although stem cell-mediated therapy of DMD holds great
promise a recent study has demonstrated the extremely low efficiency of this
technique in the mdx4cv mouse model
(Ferarri et al, 2001). The mdx4cv
model has a stop codon mutation in exon 53 of the dystrophin gene preventing
the formation of revertant dystrophin-expressing fibres that arise after exon
skipping and allow for the expression of truncated functional forms of
dystrophin. Less than one percent of muscle fibres were found to express
dystrophin at any time over ten months in mdx4cv
mice injected with whole bone marrow cells. The cumulative data from these
studies would suggest that stem cell mediated recruitment of
dystrophin-expressing myoblasts to dystophic muscle might only occur through
revertant fibres. If this were indeed proven to be the case then the
application of this type of therapy to the treatment of DMD will be extremely
limited.
It has also been proposed that
circulating monocytes may be able to deliver dystrophin constructs to the site
of muscle degeneration provided they can be induced to produce retroviral
vector (Parrish et al, 1996). During the degeneration of skeletal muscle large
numbers of monocytes and macrophages that act to clear muscle cell debris
infiltrate the damaged tissue (Figure
6). Using a hybrid HSV-1 amplicon/retroviral
vector system Parrish and colleagues were able to convert a monocyte/macrophage
cell line into retroviral producing cells releasing retroviral vector capable
of transducing dividing myoblasts (Parrish et al, 1999). However, the overall efficiency
of this technique was found to be extremely low as less than 0.1 % of myoblasts
were transduced by retroviral vector produced from macrophages. This was likely
a consequence of the toxicity that the HSV-1 vector conferred on the producer
monocytes coupled with the low level of HSV-1-mediated monocyte infection
(approximately 1% of monocytes were proposed to be producer cells). Given the
high efficiency of adenoviral-mediated human monocyte/macrophage transduction (Figure 7), we proposed to use the hybrid adeno-retroviral vector system in
a similar monocyte-mediated targeting approach. In preliminary studies we used
monocyte/macrophages infected with hybrid adeno-retroviral vectors expressing
green fluorescent protein

Figure 5. Novel PCR-based technique to detect integrated
retroviral sequences in genomic DNA. During retroviral reverse transcription of
genomic RNA and subsequent integration into the host genome the 3Õ-LTR U3
sequence duplicates to form the 5Õ-LTR U3 sequence of the proviral integrant.
Forward primer 1 binds to both the 5Õ and 3Õ LTR and is used in conjunction
with reverse primer 2, which binds to the retroviral packaging signal, to
amplify target sequences. Nested PCR is then employed using identical reverse
primer 2 with forward primer 3 that specifically binds the retroviral 3ÕLTR.
Therefore, amplicon only accumulates subsequent to retroviral LTR duplication
and is indicative reverse transcription and integration.

Figure 6. Monocyte localisation to dystrophic tissue. A 10 mm muscle
section is stained with antibody recognising the Mac-1 cell surface marker
present only on murine monocyte/macrophages. Note the accumulation of signal
around a number of myofibres (indicated by arrowhead) that are likely to be
degenerating.

Figure 7. Adenoviral-mediated expression of transgene in human
monocytes. FACS analysis of human monocyte infected with adenoviral vector
expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Dose response indicates some 60 %
of cells can be transduced by using a relatively low dose of vector
(approximately 100 plaque forming units per monocyte).

Figure 8. Gene transfer to muscle cells using monocytes as delivery
vehicles. Mouse monocytes were infected with adenoviral vector alone (A) or with adeno-retroviral vector
capable of producing retrovirus expressing GFP (B). Infected monocytes were co-cultured with primary cultures from mdx muscle at the myoblast stage. After
two weeks post-mitotic myotubes formed and were analysed for GFP expression by
fluorescent microscopy. A four-fold increase in GFP expression amongst myotubes
was observed in cultures infected with hybrid adeno-retroviral vector
(GFP) to transduce proliferating
cultures of primary myoblasts from the mdx
mouse (Roberts et al, 2000). We achieved a four-fold increase in GFP expression
in myotubes co-cultured with macrophages producing retroviral vector over
negative controls (Figure 8). However, retroviral vector
production was also found to be inefficient in monocyte/macrophages when using
the adeno-retroviral vector system, presumably because adenoviral infection of
macrophages results in the release of cytokines (Kristofersson et al, 1997;
Zhang et al, 2001), which may attenuate expression from the retroviral LTR
(Kitamura, 1999). It will be necessary to optimise this method by employing
retroviral elements with hybrid CMV/LTR promoters and adenoviral vectors with
increased deletions and lower cytotoxicity to improve the efficiency of this
approach before examining its feasibility in
vivo.
IV. Conclusions
Considering that researchers are yet
to discover the perfect gene transfer vector a number of groups have started to
combine the favourable elements from different viral vectors to construct
chimeras. One such hybrid viral system has particular application for the
treatment of DMD. Using a hybrid adeno-retrovirus, differentiated myotubes have
been shown to efficiently produce retroviral vector. Moreover, skeletal muscle
acts as an efficient platform for retroviral vector production resulting in
increased transduction of myofibres in
vivo. These observations have direct applications for the treatment of DMD.
Indeed, expression of micro-dystrophin mediated from a hybrid adeno-retroviral
vector partially corrects the dystrophic phenotype of mdx mice. Furthermore, expression of transgene was shown to be
stable as indicated by the detection of retroviral vector sequences in genomic
DNA isolated from transduced muscle fibres. Due to the high rate of muscle
turnover observed in DMD patients it is essential that an effective therapy
should involve the targeted delivery of therapeutic transgene so that it is
expressed for life. In order to achieve this goal gene transfer systems based
on integrating viral vectors and muscle stem cells must be further developed.
Indeed, future studies may reveal that successful gene therapy of DMD will only
arise from a marriage between viral and cell-mediated gene transfer techniques.
References
Akkaraju
GR, Huard J, Hoffman EP, Goins WF, Pruchnic R, Watkins SC, Cohen JB, and
Glorioso JC (1999) Herpes simplex
virus vector-mediated dystrophin gene transfer and expression in MDX mouse
skeletal muscle. J. Gene Med. 1,
280-289.
Alameddine
HS, Quantin B, Cartaud A, Dehaupas M, Mandel JL, and Fardeau M (1994) Expression of a recombinant
dystrophin in mdx mice using adenovirus vector. Neuromusc. Disord. 4, 193-203.
Ascadi G,
Jani A, Massie B, Simoneau M, Holland P, Blaschuk K, and Karpati G (1994) Cultured human myoblasts and
myotubes show markedly different transducibility by replication-defective
adenovirus recombinants. Gene Ther. 3, 579-584.
Ascadi G,
Lochmuller H, Jani A, Huard J, Massie B, Prescott S, Simoneau M, Petrof BJ, and
Karparti G (1996) Dystrophin
expression in muscles of mdx mice after adenovirus-mediated in vivo gene
transfer. Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 129-140.
Athanasopoulos
T, Fabb SA, Dickson JG (2000) Gene
therapy vectors based on adeno-associated virus: Characteristics and
applications to acquired and inherited diseases (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 6, 363-375.
Bredt DS (1999) Knocking
signalling out of the dystrophin complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E89-E91.
Brenmen JE, Chao DS, Xia H, Aldape K, and Bredt DS (1995) Nitrogen-oxide synthase complexed with dystrophin and absent
from skeletal-muscle sarcolemma in Duchenne Muscular-Dystrophy. Cell 82, 743-752.
Caplen NJ,
Higginbotham JN, Scheel JR, Vahanian N, Yoshida Y, Hamada H, Blaese RM, and
Ramsey WJ (1999) Adeno-retroviral
chimeric viruses as in vivo transducing agents. Gene Ther. 6, 454-459.
Chen HH,
Mack LM, Kelly R, Ontell M, Kochanek S, and Clemens PR (1997) Persistence in muscle of an adenoviral vector that lacks all
viral genes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.
95, 1645-1650.
Clemens PR,
Kochanek S, Sunada Y, Chan S, Chen HH, Campbell KP, and Caskey CT (1996) In vivo muscle gene transfer of
full-length dystrophin with an adenoviral vector that lacks all viral genes. Gene Ther. 3, 965-72.
Costantini
LC, Jacoby DR, Wang S, Fraefel C, Breakefield XO, and Isacson O (1999) Gene transfer to the
nigrostriatal system by hybrid herpes simplex virus/adeno-associated virus
amplicon vectors. Hum. Gene Ther.
10, 2527-2537.
Culver KW,
Ram Z, Walbridge S, Ishii H, Oldfield EH, and Blease RM (1992) In vivo gene transfer with retroviral vector-producer cells
for treatment of experimental brain tumors. Science 256, 1550-1552.
Curran MA,
Kaiser SM, Achacoso PL, and Nolan GP (2000)
Efficient transduction of nondividing cells by optimized feline
immunodeficiency virus vectors. Mol.
Ther. 1, 31-38.
Decrouy A,
Renaud JM, Davis HL, Lunde JA, Dickson G, and Jasmin BJ (1997) Mini-dystrophin gene transfer in mdx4cv diaphragm muscle
fibers increases sarcolemmal stability. Gene
Ther. 4, 401-408.
Duisit G,
Salvetti A, Moullier P, and Cosset FL (1999)
Functional characterization of adenoviral/retroviral chimeric vectors and their
use for efficient screening of retroviral producer cell lines. Hum. Gene Ther. 10, 189-200.
Dunckley
MG, Wells DJ, Walsh FS, and Dickson G (1993)
Direct retroviral-mediated transfer of a dystrophin minigene into mdx mouse
muscle in vivo. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2,
717-723.
Emery AE (1993) Duchenne muscular dystrophy -
Meryon's disease. Neuromuscul. Disord. 3,
263-6.
England SB, Nicholson LVB, Johnson MA, Forrest SM, Love DR, Zubrzyckagaarn
EE, Bulman DE, Harris JB, Davies KE (1990)
Very mild muscular-dystrophy associated with the deletion of 46 % of
dystrophin. Nature 343, 180-182.
Fassati A,
Wells DJ, Serpente PAS, Walsh FS, Brown SC, Strong PN, and Dickson G (1997) Genetic correction of dystrophin
deficiency and skeletal muscle remodelling in adult mdx mouse via
transplantation of retroviral producer cells. J. Clin. Invest. 100, 620-628.
Fassati A,
Wells DJ, Walsh F, and Dickson G (1996)
Transplantation of retroviral producer cells for in vivo gene transfer into
mouse skeletal muscle. Hum. Gene Ther.
7, 595-602.
Fassati A,
Wells DJ, Walsh FS, and Dickson G (1995)
Efficiency of in vivo gene transfer using murine retroviral vectors is strain
dependent in mice. Hum. Gene Ther.
6, 1177-1183.
Feng M,
Jackson WH, Goldman CK, Rancourt C, Wang M, Dusing SK, Siegal G, and Curiel DT
(1997) Stable in vivo gene
transduction via a novel adenoviral/retroviral chimeric vector. Nature Biotech. 15, 866-870.
Ferrari G,
Stornaiuolo A, and Mavilio F (2001)
Failure to correct murine muscular dystrophy. Nature 411, 1014-1015.
Floyd SS,
Clemens PR, Ontell MR, Kochanek S, Day CS, Yang J, Haushka SD, Balkir R, Morgan
J, Moreland MS, Feero GW, Epperly M, and Huard J (1998) Ex vivo gene transfer using adenovirus-mediated full-length
dystrophin delivery to dystrophic muscles. Gene
Ther. 5, 19-30.
Fraefel C,
Jacoby DR, Lage C, Hilderbrand H, Chou JY, Alt FW, Breakefeild XO, and Majzoub
JA (1997) Gene transfer into
hepatocytes mediated by helper virus-free HSV/AAV hybrid vectors. Mol. Med. 3, 813-825.
Grady RM, Grange RW, Lau KS, Maimone MM, Michol MC, Stull JT, and Sanes
JR (1999) Role for
alpha-dystrobrevin in the pathogenesis of dystrophin-dependent muscular
dystrophies. Nat. Cell Biol. 1,
215-220.
Gussoni E,
Soneoka Y, Strickland CD, Buzney EA, Khan MK, Flint AF, Kunkel LM, and Mulligan
RC (1997) Dystrophin expression in
the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature 401, 390-394.
Holzer GW,
Mayrhofer JA, Gritschenberger W, Domer F, and Falkner FG (1999) Poxviral/retroviral chimeric vectors allow cytoplasmic
production of transducing defective retroviral particles. Virology 253, 107-114.
Johnston
JC, Gasmi M, Lim LE, Elder JH, Yee JK, Jolly DJ, Campbell KP, Davidson BL, and
Sauter SL (1999) Minimum
requirements for efficient transduction of dividing and nondividing cells by
feline immunodeficiency virus vectors. J.
Virol. 73, 4991-5000.
Johnston
KM, Jacoby D, Pechan PA, Fraefel C, Borghesani P, Schuback D, Dunn RJ, Smith
FI, and Breakefield XO (1997)
HSV/AAV hybrid amplicon vectors extend transgene expression in human glioma
cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 359-370.
Kafri T,
Blomer U, Peterson DA, Gage FH, and Verma IM (1997) Sustained expression of genes delivered directly into liver
and muscle by lentiviral vectors. Nat.
Genet. 17, 314-317.
Kafri T, Morgan
D, Krahl T, Sarvetnick N, Sherman L, and Verma I (1998) Cellular immune response to adenoviral vector infected cells
does not require de novo viral gene expression: Implications for gene therapy. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 95,
11377-11382.
Kitamura
M (1999) Bystander macrophages
silence transgene expression driven by the retroviral long terminal repeat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257,
74-78.
Kristoffersen
AK, Sindre H, Mandi Y, Rollag H, and Degre M (1997) Effect of adenovirus 2 on cellular gene activation in
blood-derived monocytes and macrophages. APMIS.
105, 402-409.
Li KJ and
Garoff H (1998) Packaging of intron
containing genes into retrovirus vectors by alpha virus vectors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U S A. 95,
3650-3654.
Lieber A,
Steinwaerder DS, Carlson CA, and Kay MA (1999)
Integrating adenovirus-adeno-associated virus hybrid vectors devoid of all
viral genes. J. Virol. 73,
9314-9324.
Lin X (1998) Construction of new retroviral
producer cells from adenoviral and retroviral vectors. Gene Ther. 5, 1251-1258.
Linden RM,
Ward P, Giraud C, Winocour E, and Berns KI (1996) Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 93,
11288-11294.
Lochmuller
H, Petrof BJ, Pari G, Larochelle N, Dodelet V, Wang Q, Allen C, Prescott S,
Massie B, Nalbabtoglu J, and Karpati G (1996)
Transient immunosuppression by FK506 permits a sustained high-level dystrophin
expression after adenovirus-mediated dystrophin minigene transfer to skeletal
muscles of adult dystrophic (mdx) mice. Gene
Ther. 3, 706-716.
Parrish E,
Peltekian E, Dickson G, Epstein AL, and Garcia L (1999) Cell engineering for muscle gene therapy: Extemporaneous
production of retroviral vector packaging macrophages using defective herpes
simplex virus type 1 vectors harbouring gag, pol, env genes. Cytotechnology 30, 173-180.
Parrish EP,
Cifuentes-Diaz C, Li ZL, Vicart P, Paulin D, Dreyfus PA, Peschanski M, Harris
AJ, and Garcia L (1996) Targeting
widespread sites of damage in dystrophic muscle: engrafted macrophages as
potential shuttles. Gene Ther. 3,
13-20.
Petrof BJ,
Lochmuller H, Massie B, Yang L, Macmillan C, Zhao JE, Nalbantoglu J, and
Karpati G (1996) Impairment of force
generation after adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to muscle is alleviated by
adenoviral gene inactivation and host CD8+ T cell deficiency. Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 1813-1826.
Ponnazhagan
S, Erikson D, Kearns WG, Zhou SZ, Nahreini P, Wang XS, and Srivastava A (1997) Lack of site-specific integration
of the recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 genomes in human cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 275-284.
Pruchnic R,
Cao BH, Peterson ZQQ, Xiao X, Li J, Samulski RJ, Epperly M, and Huard J (2000) The use of adeno-associated virus
to circumvent the maturation-dependent viral transduction of muscle fibers. Hum. Gene Ther. 11, 521-536.
Quantin B,
Perricaudet LD, Tajbakhsh S, and Mandel JL (1992) Adenovirus as an expression vector in muscle cells in vivo. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 89,
2581-2584.
Rafael JA,
Sunada Y, Cole NM, Campbell KP, Faulkner JA, and Chamberlain JS (1994) Prevention of dystrophic
pathology in mdx mice by a truncated dystrophin isoform. Hum. Mol. Genet. 3, 1725-1733.
Ramsey WJ,
Caplen NJ, Li Q, Higginbotham JN, Shah M, and Blaese RM (1998) Adenovirus vectors as transcomplementing templates for the
production of replication defective retroviral vectors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246, 912-919.
Recchia A,
Parks RJ, Lamartina S, Toniatti C, Pieroni L, Palombo F, Ciliberto G, Graham
FL, Cortese R, La Monica N, and Colloca S (1999)
Site-specific integration mediated by a hybrid adenovirus/adeno-associated
virus vector. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.
96, 2615-2620.
Reynolds
PN, Feng M, and Curiel DT (1999)
Chimeric viral vectors – the best of both worlds? Mol. Med. Today 5, 25-31.
Roberts M,
Patterson S, and Dickson G (2000)
Novel strategies for the treatment of DMD: evaluating the feasibility of using
macrophages as retrovirus-producing cells. Mol.
Ther. 1, S331.
Roberts ML,
Athanasopoulos T, Pohlschmidt M, Duisit G, Cosset FL, and Dickson G (2001) Post-mitotic, differentiated
myotubes efficiently produce retroviral vector from adeno-retrovirus templates.
Gene Ther. 8, 1580-1586.
Rydercook
AS, Sicinski P, Thomas K, Davies KE, Worton RG, Barnard EA, Darlison MG, and
Barnard PJ (1988) Localization of
the mdx mutation within the mouse dystrophin gene. EMBO. J. 7, 3017-3021.
Sakoda T,
Kasahara N, Hamamori Y, and Kedes L (1999)
A high-titer lentiviral production system mediates efficient transduction of
differentiated cells including beating cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 31, 2037-2047.
Seppen J,
Barry SC, Harder B, and Osborne WR (2001)
Lentivirus administration to rat muscle provides efficient sustained expression
of erythropoietin. Blood 98,
594-596.
Tan BT, Wu
L, and Berk AJ (1999) An
adenovirus-Epstein-Barr virus hybrid vector that stably transforms cultured
cells with high efficiency. J. Virol.
73, 7582-7589.
Torrente Y,
Tremblay JP, Pisati F, Belicchi M, Rossi B, Sironi M, Fortunato F, El Fahime M,
DÕAngelo MG, Caron NJ, Constantin G, Paulin D, Scarlato G, and Bresolin N (2001) Intraarterial injection of
muscle-derived CD34(+)Sca-1(+) stem cells restores dystrophin in mdx mice. J. Cell Biol. 152, 335-348.
Ueno T,
Matsumura H, Tanaka K, Iwasaki T, Ueno I, Fujinaga K, Asada K, and Kato I (2000) Site-specific integration of a
transgene mediated by a hybrid adenovirus/adeno-associated virus vector using
the Cre/loxP-expression switching system. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 273, 473-478.
Van
Deutekom JCT, Cao B, Pruchnic R, Wickham TJ, Kovesdi I., and Huard J (1999) Extended tropism of an adenoviral
vector does not circumvent the maturation-dependent transducibility of mouse
skeletal muscle. J. Gene Med. 1,
393-399.
Vincent N,
Ragot T, Gilgenkrantz H, Couton D, Chafey P, Gregoire A, Briand P, Kaplan JC,
Kahn A, and Perricaudet M (1993)
Long-term correction of mouse dystrophic degeneration by adenovirus-mediated
transfer of a minidystrophin gene. Nature
Genet. 5, 130-134.
Wang B, Li J, and Xiao X (2000)
Adeno-associated virus vector carrying human minidystrophin genes effectively
ameliorates muscular dystrophy in mdx mouse model. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 13714-13719.
Yang L,
Lochmuller H, Luo J, Massie B, Nalbantoglu J, Karpati G, and Petrof BJ (1998) Adenovirus-mediated dystrophin
minigene transfer improves muscle strength in adult dystrophic (MDX) mice. Gene Ther. 5, 369-379.
Yuasa K,
Miyagoe Y, Yamamoto K, Nabeshima Y, Dickson G, and Takeda S (1998) Effective restoration of
dystrophin-associated proteins in vivo by adenovirus-mediated transfer of
truncated dystrophin cDNAs. FEBS. Letts.
425, 329-336.
Zhang Y,
Chirmule N, Gao GP, Qian R, Croyle M, Joshi B, Tazelaar J, and Wilson JM (2001) Acute cytokine response to
systemic adenoviral vectors in mice is mediated by dendritic cells and
macrophages. Mol. Ther. 3, 697-707.

Division of Biochemistry, Royal Holloway - University
of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom,
Tel: +44 (0)1784 443873, Fax: +44 (0)1784 434326,
e-mail:M.L.Roberts@rhul.ac.uk