Gene Ther Mol Biol Vol 9, 61-76,
2005
Cytokine gene
transfer in the therapy of autoimmune diseases
Detlef Neumann1
and Diana Boraschi2,*
1Hannover
Medical School, Hannover, Germany
2Institute
of Biomedical Technologies, CNR, Pisa, Italy __________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Diana Boraschi, Laboratory of Cytokines, Unit of Immunobiology,
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Area della Ricerca di S. Cataldo, Via G.
Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy; Tel: +39/050/3152775; Fax: +39/050/3153973; E-mail: diana.boraschi@itb.cnr.it
Key words: gene transfer, DNA vaccination,
cytokines, chemokines, autoimmunity
Abbreviations: adjuvant arthritis,
(AA); adeno-associated virus, (AAV); anti-phospholipid syndrome, (APS); collagen-induced
arthritis, (CIA); collagen
type II, (CII); cytotoxic T
lymphocytes, (CTL); dendritic cells, (DC); delayed type hypersensitivity, (DTH); experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, (EAE);
experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, (EAU); Epstein-Barr virus, (EBV);
glomerulonephritis, (GN); intradermal, (i.d.);
intramuscular, (i.m.); intravenous, (i.v.); multiple sclerosis, (MS); natural killer, (NK);
non-obese diabetic, (NOD); nephrotoxic serum, (NTS); ovalbumin, (OVA); rheumatoid arthritis, (RA); severe combined
immune deficiency, (SCID); streptococcal cell walls, (SCW); toll-like receptors, (TLR); trinitrobenzene sulphonic
acid, (TNBS); virally encoded IL-10, (vIL-10)
Summary
Delivery of DNA coding for
disease-modifying proteins has been experimented as a therapeutic option for
over 15 years. Since the first clinical trial in 1989, about 900 trials have
been approved worldwide in order to demonstrate safety, feasibility, and
therapeutic benefits, cancer being the most common disease indication. Systems
for efficient, safe, and targeted delivery of DNA encoding therapeutic proteins
are actively studied and include viral vectors (mostly retro- and
adenoviruses), non-viral vectors, and delivery of naked plasmid DNA. In
autoimmune diseases, classical therapies are aiming at inhibiting either
lymphocyte activation (immunosuppressive agents), or the downstream
inflammatory effector mechanisms responsible for organ and tissue destruction
(anti-inflammatory drugs). Newer therapies are being developed targeting
inflammatory and immunostimulating cytokines, with the use of the so-called
cytokine traps (recombinant and chimeric proteins and antibodies which
capture and inhibit pathological cytokines) or of recombinant regulatory
cytokines able to inhibit inflammatory cytokine production. In this context,
gene therapy and DNA vaccination are very promising approaches, which could
avoid problems connected with life-long treatments with protein drugs and
achieve optimal efficacy. In this review, two parallel approaches will be
examined, delivery of genes encoding cytokine inhibitors (regulatory cytokines,
cytokine inhibitors including cytokine receptors), and DNA vaccination with
genes coding for the pathogenic cytokines, to trigger an endogenous
anti-cytokine response with therapeutic effects.
I. Introduction
A. Cytokines in
chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases
Autoimmune diseases include a variety of
chronic syndromes, characterised by anomalous and uncontrolled reaction of the
host immune system against self-antigens which causes progressive tissue damage
and eventual organ failure. Although the triggering causes of autoimmune
reaction are not fully defined (genetic causes, environmental factors,
cross-reacting infections may take part to it), autoimmunity in many cases
starts as an inflammatory-type reaction with production of high amounts of
inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, active in stimulating lymphocyte
proliferation and inhibiting their apoptosis, and amplifying autoantibody
production. Down-regulation of the innate/inflammatory reaction occurs as a
consequence of inflammation (e.g.,
inflammatory cytokines activate anti-inflammatory mechanisms in an
autoregulatory circuit) and as a consequence of depletion of the triggering
stimulus (e.g., when an infectious
microorganism is eliminated by defence mechanisms), and re-establishes the
physiological homeostatic equilibrium. In autoimmune reactions, the
down-regulatory control circuits are either defective (e.g., by genetic mutations), or circumvented (e.g., suppressed by altered regulatory cytokines), or do not come
into play (e.g., because of
persistence of the self triggering stimulus). The defective down-regulation of
the innate/adaptive immune response amplifies and establishes the
inflammatory/autoimmune reaction.
B. Therapeutic
use of cytokines and cytokine receptors/inhibitors
Cytokines are becoming important targets
in new therapeutic approaches to inflammatory diseases. The role of
inflammatory and regulatory cytokines in autoimmune pathogenesis and in the
downstream destructive effects has been widely studied in experimental models,
in particular with the use of organ/tissue specific cytokine knock-out or
transgenic mice. Evidence in animal models has been in general confirmed in
autoimmune patients, where enhanced levels of several cytokines (identified as
pathogenic in experimental models) strictly correlate with disease severity.
Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, mostly responsible of the downstream
tissue destructive effects, thus became the first target for the development of
anti-cytokine therapies in autoimmunity. The pivotal role of TNF-a and IL-1b in tissue destruction in rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) and in Crohns disease has led to the development of the first
biotechnological cytokine traps for therapeutic use. Anti-TNF-a therapy in RA is in clinical use since
few years with three different drugs: infliximab, a human/murine chimeric
monoclonal antibody to TNF-a (Charles et al, 1999); etanercept, a recombinant fusion
protein encompassing the extracellular domain of the type II TNF-R fused to the
constant portion of human IgG1 (Lyseng-Williamson and Plosker, 2004);
adalimumab, a fully human anti-TNF-a neutralising monoclonal antibody (Furst
et al, 2003; Toussirot and Wendling, 2004). Likewise, anakinra (the recombinant
form of the cytokine IL-1Ra, the natural receptor antagonist of IL-1b) is in clinical trial for RA and Crohns
disease (Burls and Jobanputra, 2004). The drawback in the clinical use of these
cytokine traps is that very frequent intravenous administrations are necessary
to achieve neutralisation of the target inflammatory cytokine and clinical
amelioration, which however is readily lost upon discontinuation of drug
delivery. A new generation of cytokine traps with a better pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic profile is being developed, by engineering the extracellular
portion of cytokine receptors on the constant region of IgG (Economides et al,
2003). Chimeric constructs encompassing heterodimers or in-line dimers of
soluble receptor portions fused to constant IgG fragment have been prepared for
IL-1 (IL-1RAcP and IL-1RI), IL-4 (IL-2Rg and IL-4Ra), and IL-6 (IL-6Ra and gp130). These cytokine traps can
potently inhibit the cytokine activity in
vivo in experimental animals. The IL-1 trap also significantly inhibited
bone erosion and arthritic symptoms in an experimental model of RA
(collagen-induced arthritis, CIA, in the mouse). Thus, their development and
use in autoimmune diseases may bypass many of the problems of cytokine
inhibitors in chronic therapy (Dinarello , 2003).
C. Gene therapy
and cDNA immunisation - vectors, advantages, drawbacks
Gene therapy is defined as the
introduction of DNA into a host for therapeutic purposes. After introduction,
DNA is taken up by the hosts cells, which express the gene product encoded by
the exogenous DNA. Thus, in the immune system gene therapy could be used to
compensate known gene defects, to intervene in signal transduction processes,
or to deliver immunomodulating factors, e.g.
cytokines.
The first human trial of gene therapy was
performed in 1989 by the group of Steve Rosenberg in cancer patients (Rosenberg
et al, 1990). Since that time over 900 clinical trials of gene therapy have
been approved, some of which have been completed while others are still ongoing
(Edelstein et al, 2004). The delivery of DNA to the host is advantagous over
the administration of peptides or attenuated pathogens since it is more stable
after transfer and it is easy and cost-effective to prepare in large
quantities.
In human trials today the most widely used
vectors are of retroviral origin, derived from a murine retrovirus. Such vector
systems target only dividing cells and transduce them with a high efficiency.
However, the size of the cDNA that can be delivered with a retrovirus is very
limited. Another disadvantage is the property of retrovirally delivered cDNA to
stably insert into the host genome. If the cDNA insertion (which is random)
alters the expression of important control genes (e.g., proto-oncogenes or a tumour suppressor genes), retroviral
gene therapy may also lead to serious diseases (e.g., malignancies). Such theoretical risk has become reality in
2002, when two of ten SCID patients which were treated with retrovirally based
gene therapy developed leukemia-like conditions due to insertional mutations
(Hacein-Bey-Abina et al, 2003a, b).
The second most used vector system is
adenoviral, based on serotype 5 adenoviruses, in which the regions E1a and E1b
are deleted in order to prevent replication. Adenoviral vectors can carry
longer cDNAs than retroviral vectors, but the size is still limited, and they
can also infect non-dividing cells. In addition, they yield a high efficiency
of transduction and a high level of expression. The main drawback of adenoviral
vectors is their immunogenicity, with the risk of provoking severe immune and
inflammatory responses (Raper et al, 2003).
In contrast to the delivery systems
mentioned above, delivery of naked DNA does not imply size restrictions and has
no problems of immunogenicity. However, the level of expression is lower than
that achieved by viral vectors. In some trials, attempts were made to enhance
the cellular uptake of the naked cDNA by the addition of cationic lipids or
with mechanical treatment of the recipient tissue (Losordo et al, 2002; Fortuin
et al, 2003; Taniyama et al, 2002; Wells, 2004).
II. Cytokine and anti-cytokine therapy with gene transfer
The in
vivo administration of cytokine genes has begun in the late 80s (Nishihara
et al, 1988) and has been studied since that time in various experimental
disease models. A number of cytokine genes was introduced by several techniques
in a variety of models. Among the best studied genes for cytokines and cytokine
receptors, in particular in autoimmune diseases, are those coding for
regulatory cytokines IL-10, TGF-b, IL-1Ra, and for the soluble inhibitory cytokine
receptors sTNF-R, sIL-1R, IL-18BP, and sIFN-gR. The determination of optimal route and
vector system to transfer the DNA into the host cells is still a matter of
discussion. Studies describing the application of naked DNA are becoming more
and more abundant, but viral delivery systems, mostly adenoviral or
adeno-associated vectors, are still the most common in use.
A. Delivery
systems
A number of approaches are used to deliver
DNA into the host cells. These include application of naked DNA, DNA complexed
with liposomes, or DNA transferred by viral vectors. DNA can be applied
systemically or locally, either by injection of the DNA or by reintroduction of
ex vivo engineered host cells at the
designated site (intratumour or inflammatory sites, e.g. joints in RA) (Piccirillo and Prud'homme, 2003). Cells
successfully used as vehicle are T cells, fibroblasts, and dendritic cells (DC)
(Morita et al, 2001; Nakajima et al, 2001; Rabinovich et al, 1999).
A simple way of application is the
injection of suspended DNA into the hosts muscle. The injected DNA is taken up
by muscle cells by still undefined mechanisms. The uptake can be enhanced
either chemically by treatment with cardiotoxin (Davis et al, 1993) or
bupivacaine (Wells, 1993; Vitadello et al, 1994), or by electroporation of the
muscle (Aihara and Miyazaki, 1998). Injection of DNA into the hosts muscle is
a kind of local application since the DNA is thought not to be distributed
throughout the body by the blood or lymphatic system. However, plasmid DNA has
been detected in plasma and in association with blood cells for several hours
after intramuscular (i.m.) inoculation (Winegar et al, 1996). It was also shown
that injected naked DNA is transported beyond regional lymph nodes, e.g., to sites of chronic inflammation,
with the contribution of antigen-presenting cells. (La Cava et al, 2000). In
addition, the ablation of the injected muscle as soon as one minute after
inoculation did not abrogate the induced humoral immune response (Torres et al,
1997). Thus, one has to consider that DNA applied locally to the muscle can
diffuse to sites other than that of application.
The injection of suspended DNA is the most
simple and cost-effective way. By far more complex is the gene-gun method since
it requires some technical equipment and, in addition the the preparation of
the DNA, its efficient and reproducible coating onto the carrier gold
particles. On the other hand, delivery of naked DNA by gene-gun is highly
efficient. In genetic immunisation studies it was shown that far less DNA has
to be applied by gene-gun as compared to needle injection, to obtain the same
level of expression of the exogenous gene (Barry and Johnston, 1997; Feltquate
et al, 1997; Pertmer et al, 1995). The magnitude and duration of the
DNA-induced immune response depends on the route of delivery. Antibody and CTL
(cytotoxic T lymphocyte) responses after intradermal (i.d.) application were
found to be fast and more transient, while after i.m. injection they were slower
but more sustained (Ito et al, 2003). Thus, to obtain an optimal (i.e., fast and sustained) immune
response after genetic immunisation, DNA should be applied by gene-gun using
both routes, i.m. and i.d.
The nature of the immune response also
seems to depend on the application route. While needle injection induces a
predominantely Th1 response, the response after gene-gun administration is
mainly of the Th2 type (Barry and Johnston, 1997; Feltquate et al, 1997). A
more recent study provides additional information about the influence of the
form of the expressed protein on the immune response. By i.d. gene-gun
immunisation, three forms (cytosolic, secreted, transmembrane) of the model
protein ovalbumin (OVA) all induced a specific antibody response, while only
the cytosolic and the transmembrane forms were able to generate an additional
CTL reaction. In contrast, by i.m. injection only the secreted protein could
generate an antibody response, whereas the CTL reaction was induced by the
secreted and the transmembrane OVA forms. Thus, it could be possible to obtain
different types of immune response by varying the route of DNA administration
and the cellular localisation of the expressed protein (Morel et al, 2004).
In the case of autoimmune-prone hosts,
i.m. injection of DNA not only induces an immune response against the expressed
protein, but it can also lead to the generation of anti-DNA antibodies. Thus,
in autoimmune diseases the therapeutic effect of genetic immunisation, due to
response against the expressed protein, could be attenuated or even abrogated
due to the concomitant acceleration of autoimmune response (increased levels of
anti-dsDNA and anti-nuclear antibodies) driven by the exogenously applied DNA
which mimicks the autoantigen cellular DNA (MacColl et al, 2001). However,
although DNA administration might accelerate autoimmune disease, several
studies demonstrate the significant beneficial effects of gene therapy. Among
these, the administration of DNA coding for cytokines or their receptors is of
particular relevance for the very promising results obtained. In the following
sections we will discuss some of the main cytokine molecules used in gene
therapy of autoimmunity. The most relevant studies of cytokine/receptor gene
delivery in experimental models of autoimmune diseases are summarised in Table 1.
B. Regulatory
cytokines: IL-10
IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory and
regulatory cytokine. It is produced by lymphocytes, monocytes, and (at least in
mice) keratinocytes, and inhibits the synthesis of inflammatory and Th1-derived
cytokines such as IL-1, TNF-a, IL-6, IL-2, and IFN-g. A virally-encoded IL-10
Table 1. Cytokines/receptor gene delivery in models of
autoimmune diseases
|
Cytokine/Receptor |
Disease Model |
Outcome |
Reference |
|
Cytokines |
|||
|
IL-10 |
TNBS colitis, IL-10-/-
colitis |
loss body weight and histological score; stool IL-1b and sTNF-R2; acute phase proteins; colonic IFN-g and IL-6; spleen TNF-a, IFN-g, RANTES (only IL-10-/-) |
Lindsay et al, 2001, 2002 |
|
|
NTS nephritis in rats |
glomerular crescent formation and leukocyte
infiltrate; proteinuria and kidney dysfunction; glomerular expression IFN-g, TNF-a, MCP-1 |
Higuchi et al, 2003 |
|
|
Experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in rats and mice |
ocular pathological signs; spleen IFN-g and IL-2 |
de Kozak et al, 2002; Verwaerde et al,
2003 |
|
|
Diabetes in
NOD mice |
diabetes incidence; severe insulitis; normalisation islet insulin content;
anti-insulin autoantibodies |
Goudy et al, 2001; Goudy et al, 2003;
Koh et al, 2000; Nitta et al, 1998; Yang et al, 2002 |
|
|
Islet
transplantation in NOD mice |
islet graft takes; normalisation glycemia; lymphocytic infiltrate; anti-oxidant enzymes |
Zhang et al, 2003 |
|
|
SCW arthritis |
erosive disease (local) both ipsilaterally and
contralaterally |
Miagkov et al, 2002; Whalen et al,
1999 |
|
TGF-b |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
autoantibodies to chromatin |
Raz et al, 1993 |
|
|
SCW arthritis |
erosive disease (i.m.); cartilage matrix degradation (local) |
Song et al, 1998; Zhibao et al, 2004 |
|
|
Diabetes in NOD mice |
plasma TGF-b; pancreatic IFN-g and IL-1, DTH, insulitis, diabetes |
Piccirillo et al, 1998 |
|
|
Wounds in diabetic BKS.Cg-m+/+
Leprdb mice |
Accelerated wound healing |
Chesnoy et al, 2003 |
|
|
EAE in mice (local) |
disease score |
Croxford et al, 1998 |
|
IL-4 |
Diabetes in
NOD mice |
Undetectable circulating IL-4; protection from disease development
(chimera IL-4-IgG1) No effect on disease development (IL-4) insulitis and diabetes development; induction
circulating IL-4 (IL-4, epidermal delivery) |
Cameron et al, 2000; Chang and
Prud'homme, 1999; Goudy et al, 2001 |
|
|
EAE in mice
(local) |
disease score |
Croxford et al, 1998 |
|
IL-10 and
IL-4 |
Diabetes in
NOD mice |
diabetes development; number intact islets; islet lymphocytic infiltrate; glucose levels |
Ko et al, 2001 |
|
IL-1Ra |
CIA |
Protection against disease development (i.m.) |
Kim et al, 2003 |
|
CCL2/MCP-1 truncated form |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
renal damage; lifespan |
Shimizu et al, 2004 |
|
IL-12 p40 (inhibitory) |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
No
effect on lupus-like symptoms |
Hagiwara et al, 2000 |
|
IL-2 |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
autoAb to
chromatin |
Raz et al, 1993 |
|
IFN-b |
EAE in mice (local) |
disease score |
Croxford et al, 1998 |
|
IFN-g |
Diabetes in
NOD mice |
Acceleration
diabetes |
Piccirillo et al, 1998 |
|
IL-12
p35/p40 |
Wild type
mice |
Systemic Th1 responses,
NK cell activation |
Watanabe et al, 1999 |
|
|
Lupus in
MRL lpr/lpr mice |
IFN-g, IgG2a; amelioration
lupus-like symptoms |
Hagiwara et al, 2000 |
|
IL-18 |
OVA-primed mice |
IL-18; Th1 response |
Kim et al, 2004; Li et al, 2004 |
|
Cytokine receptors |
|||
|
IFN-gR |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
disease symptoms (also when fully established)
(i.m.) |
Lawson et al, 2000 |
|
|
Diabetes in NOD mice |
Protection from disease induction |
Chang and Prud'homme, 1999 |
|
sTNF-R1 |
CIA |
disease progression (local)/no effect (i.m.); disease progression (chimera with IgG; i.m.) |
Mukherjee et al, 2003; Bloquel et al,
2004 |
|
|
EAE in mice (local) |
Delay disease onset |
Croxford et al, 1998 |
|
sTNF-R2 |
EAE in mice (local) |
disease score and delay disease onset (dimeric
form) |
Croxford et al, 1998 |
|
IL-18BP |
CIA |
disease symptoms |
Smeets et al, 2003a |
|
sIL-1RAcP |
CIA (local) |
local erosion; no systemic effect |
Smeets et al, 2003b |
molecule (vIL-10) is very similar in structure and activity to
mammalian IL-10. The therapeutic effects of IL-10 in a series of diseases has
been defined in studies with administration of the recombinant protein or in
genetic knock-out animal models. In addition, the DNA coding for IL-10 has been
successfully used in gene therapy studies, in tumour as well as in autoimmunity
models.
Autoimmunity leads to inflammatory/immune
reaction against self-antigens. Autoimmune inflammation can be broadly divided
into two subclasses. In the first case the reaction is directed against locally
expressed autoantigens, thus inflammation occurs almost exclusively at sites
where the antigen is present (plaques in the brain of multiple sclerosis -MS-
patients; cartilage and bone erosion in RA joints). The second type is a
systemic disease with destructive inflammation occurring in the end-organs (e.g., kidney and lung), consequent to
the deposition of immune complexes, abundantly generated by the potent humoral
autoreaction. Autoimmune complex deposition can lead to severe organ damage and
eventually death.
The beneficial effect of IL-10 gene
therapy has been shown in several models using different delivery routes. In
nephrotoxic serum (NTS) nephritis, an experimental rat model of crescentic
glomerulonephritis (GN), hydrodynamic-based intravenous (i.v.) administration
of a rather large amount of a naked plasmid coding for vIL-10 after induction
of crescentic GN was able to suppress glomerular macrophage and CD4+
T cells accumulation and production of IFN-g, TNF-a, and the chemokine CCL2. This therapy
ameliorated disease symptoms, which still occurred in the empty vector-treated
control rats (Higuchi et al, 2003). The adenoviral-mediated transfer of IL-10
in two mouse models of Crohns disease (TNBS-induced colitis; spontaneous
colitis in IL-10-/- mice) also ameliorated disease by decreasing
local proinflammatory cytokine production (Lindsay et al, 2002; Lindsay et al,
2001). In another animal model of autoimmunity, the experimental autoimmune
uveoretinitis (EAU), systemic injection of a single dose of adenovirus coding
for vIL-10 also had a beneficial effect (de Kozak et al, 2002). Additionally,
these authors showed that administration of vIL-10 via ex vivo transduced retinal cells is also a feasible approach
(Verwaerde et al, 2003).
All the above studies were performed in
models which develop predominantly Th1-mediated autoimmune diseases. IL-10
administration leads to a decreased local production of proinflammatory
cytokines such as IFN-g and TNF-a. Thereby, the Th1 phenotype was reduced, shifting the Th1-Th2
profile towards Th2, thus ameliorating disease symptoms and outcome. Cellular
mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effect of IL-10 administration were
analysed in NOD (non-obese diabetic) mice, a model for autoimmune diabetes. In
this model, autoimmune diabetes was suppressed by administration of either
rIL-10 protein, IL-10 expression plasmid, IL-10 cDNA-transduced islet-specific
T cells, or vIL-10 gene by an adeno-associated viral vector (Yang et al, 2002;
and references therein). Splenocytes from vIL-10-treated mice (enriched in CD4+/CD25+
regulatory T cells as compared with controls) could block transfer of diabetes
(Goudy et al, 2003). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the beneficial
effect of permanent IL-10 delivery to diabetes-prone NOD mice depends on the
increased presence of CD4+/CD25+ regulatory T cells.
However, the final proof of this hypothesis is still missing.
As discussed above (Section II.A.:
Delivery Systems), local application of naked DNA is effective not only at the
site of injection, but also at distant sites. This phenomenon is described as
the contralateral effect. In models of experimental arthritis, the local
transfer of viral DNA to one of the affected joints ameliorated disease both in
the treated and in the untreated contralateral joint (Lechman et al, 1999;
Whalen et al, 1999). The vIL-10 protein could be detected in the injected but
not in the contalateral joint, indicating that systemic protection after local
injection does not depend on the distribution of DNA or of the encoded protein
throughout the body. The contralateral effect is antigen-specific, and not due
to a generalised IL-10-dependent immunosuppression (Lechman et al, 2003). Thus,
it may be possible that a population of antigen-specific CD4+/CD25+
regulatory T cells, which develops following antigen stimulation in an IL-10
enriched milieu, is responsible for the protective effect. In contrast with
this hypothesis is the study by Whalen and coworkers, which demonstrates in a
mouse model of DTH (delayed type hypersensitivity; where the contralateral
effect of vIL-10 DNA therapy is also evident) that the effect depends on
modified DC and/or macrophages which, by presenting the antigen in the context
of high IL-10, generate unresponsive T cells (Whalen et al, 2001).
C. Regulatory
cytokines: IL-4
IL-4 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine
produced by Th2 cells, which is involved in Th2 responses and in the regulation
of inflammatory Th1 responses. In several autoimmune diseases, hyper-activation
of Th1 responses has a major pathological role, thus IL-4 may have a
re-balancing effect on the Th1-Th2 ratio with therapeutic effects.
In diabetic NOD mice, i.m. inoculum of a
plasmid coding for a chimeric construct IL-4-IgG1 could very efficiently
decrease autoimmune insulitis and diabetes, despite the lack of detectable
levels of circulating IL-4 (Chang Y and Prud'homme G J, 1999). In another
study, i.m. inoculum of IL-4 gene with an AAV (adeno-associated virus) vector
had no effect on disease development in NOD mice (Goudy et al, 2001). However,
epidermal delivery of the IL-4 gene with a EBV (Epstein-Barr virus) vector was
able to induce a persistent level of circulating IL-4 and in the induction of
Th2 responses, resulting in significant protection from disease development
(Cameron et al, 2000).
In murine experimental allergic
encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS, intracerebral delivery of IL-4 naked
DNA with cationic liposomes resulted in significant decrease of the disease
symptoms (Croxford et al, 1998). Local delivery without liposomes and systemic
administration had no effect.
D. Regulatory
cytokines: TGF-b
TGF-b, a product of both immune and non-immune cells, is another cytokine with potent anti-inflammatory
and regulatory activities, which is also active in development,
differentiation, tissue repair, and tumourigenesis. TGF-b has suppressive effects on the immune system since it
inhibits the proliferation of T and B cells. In addition, it suppresses the
IFN-g-induced cytotoxic activity of natural killer (NK)
cells, the activity of CTL, and the proliferation of lymphokine-activated
killer cell precursors. TGF-b also influences the secretion of immunoglobulins by B
lymphocytes, by inhibiting the synthesis of IgG and IgM while stimulating the
synthesis of IgA.
The therapeutic potential of systemic
administration of TGF-b in inflammation and immune-mediated pathologies has been shown in
several studies, a number of them including gene transfer in autoimmune models.
In an early study using repeated
inoculation of a plasmid with the gene for TGF-b, it was reported that the production of
anti-DNA autoantibodies in lupus-prone MRL lpr/lpr
mice was reduced, whereas the opposite effect (increased anti-chromatin
antibodies) was obtained with IL-2 expression vector (Raz et al, 1993, 1995).
In diabetic NOD mice, injection of TGF-b DNA also had therapeutic effects.
Piccirillo and coworkers describe the amelioration of Th1-mediated diabetic
disease in NOD mice after i.m. administration of plasmids coding for TGF-b, due to the reduced production of proinflammatory
cytokines and a shift of the IFN-g/IL-4 ratio towards IL-4, thus towards an
anti-inflammatory Th2 profile (Piccirillo et al, 1998). As a control,
inoculation of an IFN-g plasmid accelerated disease development (Piccirillo et al, 1998).
In addition, islet cells of NOD mice transfected with TGF-b DNA are able to delay diabetes recurrence
after transplantation in NOD recipients (Suarez-Pinzon et al, 2002). In another
mouse model of diabetes, i.d. injection of TGF-b DNA was able to accelerate wound healing
(Chesnoy et al, 2003), indicating that TGF-b not only ameliorates the progression of
inflammatory diabetic disease but also at least some of its associated effects.
TGF-b naked DNA inoculated intracerebrally with
cationic liposomes could decrease disease severity in murine EAE, whereas local
delivery without liposomes or i.m. administration had no effect (Croxford et
al, 1998).
TGF-b plasmids have been also used in animal
models of RA. In rats, a single i.m. injection of naked DNA for TGF-b suppressed the evolution of chronic
erosive disease of streptococcal cell wall (SCW)-induced arthritis (Song et al,
1998). In contrast, the intra-articular injection in rabbits of an adenoviral
vector expressing TGF-b resulted in enhanced cartilage matrix degradation (Zhibao et al,
2004). Besides the different animal models, reasons for these contrasting
results may be route and/or time of TGF-b DNA administration, and also the
expression level of the transgene due to the two different vector systems used.
Experiments to clarify this issue have yet to be performed.
E. Soluble
cytokine receptors: sTNF-R
TNF-a is one of the first cytokines detectable
in serum after an microbial infection, secreted
by stimulated macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, T cells, and NK cells. TNF-a is highly inflammatory and has a wide spectrum of biological
activities, e.g., it causes cytolysis
and cytostasis of many types of tumour cells, it enhances phagocytosis and
cytotoxicity by neutrophils, and it also modulates the expression of many
proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF. In addition,
TNF-a is a potent chemoattractant for neutrophils and can
induce the synthesis of a number of chemoattractants in a cell type and
tissue-specific manner.
Two receptors for TNF-a have been described, a transmembrane molecule of 55
kDa (TNF-R1, CD120a, TNFRSF1A) and a second chain of 75 kDa (TNF-R2, CD120b,
TNFRSF1B). TNF-R1 is expressed particularly on cells susceptible to the
cytotoxic action of TNF-a, while TNF-R2 is present on many cell types, in
particular those of myeloid origin. The contrasting activities of TNF-a on various cell types, i.e.
growth-promoting vs. growth-inhibiting
activities, are probably mediated by the differential expression and/or
regulation of multiple receptors in combination with other distinct
receptor-associated proteins.
In human RA, enhanced serum and synovial fluid levels
of TNF-a are found, which suggests a pathological role for TNF-a in RA. Tissues expressing TNF-a and the two TNF-Rs are found within the synovial
membrane and the cartilage, indicating that TNF-a may act directly on the affected site by promoting
the inflammatory reaction. Mukherjee and coworkers studied the effects of TNF-a inhibition in mice with CIA (Mukherjee et
al, 2003). They injected a retroviral
vector carrying the gene encoding a soluble form of
the TNF-R1 into the affected arthritic joint. They found that the anti-TNF
treatment not only reduced joint destruction in the injected joint, but also in
the contralateral and ipsilateral paws. These systemic effects were paralleled
by a reduced ratio of IgG2a:IgG1 antibodies anti-collagen type II (CII) on day
7 after DNA delivery, which led the authors to speculate about a therapeutic
reduction of the inflammatory Th1 response, while the Th2 response remains
unaffected.
In another study, three forms of the
soluble TNF-R1 have been compared in the mouse CIA model of RA. The monomeric
sTNF-R1, a dimeric sTNF-R1, and sTNF-R1/IgG chimera were administered by i.m.
injection of the encoding plasmid cDNA followed by electroporation. In this
approach, local expression of the three variants was confirmed, but only the
sTNF-R1/IgG chimera ameliorated the disease by clinical and histological
parameters. The dimeric form showed, if at all, minor clinical effets, while
the monomeric sTNF-R1 was inefficient (Bloquel et al, 2004).
In murine EAE, naked DNA coding for a
dimeric sTNF-R2 delivered locally with cationic liposomes could significantly
delay disease onset and decrease disease symptoms, whereas inoculum of
sTNF-R1/IgG delayed disease onset but was rather inefficient on disease
symptoms. In the same study, i.m. administration or local inoculum without
liposomes had no effect, highlighting the importance of adequate delivery
systems to achieve therapeutic effects (Croxford
et al, 1998).
In summary, blocking TNF-a activity by soluble receptor molecules
has proven beneficial in RA, leading to the use of a recombinant sTNF-R/Fc
fusion protein (Etanercept) in clinics. The studies mentioned above provide
evidence that this beneficial effect could be obtained also by adminstration of
the therapeutic protein by gene therapy.
F. IL-1
inhibitors: IL-1Ra, sIL-1R, sIL-1RAcP
Along with TNF-a, IL-1 is a key mediator of inflammation
and tissue and organ damage in several chronic inflammatory pathologies.
Agonist IL-1 interacts with its target cells via a receptor complex composed of
the ligand binding IL-1 receptor type I (IL-1RI) and a second receptor-like
molecule, the IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcP), which is necessary to
generate IL-1-dependent signal transduction (Wesche et al, 1997). A second IL-1
receptor (IL-1RII) also binds the IL-1 ligand and interacts with IL-1RAcP, but
is unable to generate the IL-1-induced intracellular signal, thus behaves like
a decoy receptor or ligand sink to regulate IL-1 responsiveness (Lang et al,
1998; Neumann et al, 2000). Two naturally occurring soluble molecules
antagonising IL-1 activity in vitro
and in vivo have been described. The
IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) binds to membrane IL-1RI and displaces the
agonist IL-1 ligand, but is unable to generate IL-1R-dependent signal
transduction. Thus, by competition for receptor binding sites, IL-1Ra limits
IL-1 bioactivity dose-dependently. The second inhbitory molecule is the soluble
form of the decoy IL-1RII. Upon cell activation IL-1RII is shed from the cell
surface as a soluble molecule (sIL-1RII) which still binds agonist IL-1,
thereby sequestering it out of the activation circuit (Kollewe et al, 2000).
Thus, both molecules, IL-1Ra and sIL-1RII, act as regulators of the
inflammatory reaction by inhibiting the activity of proinflammatory IL-1.
Administration of recombinant IL-1Ra or
sIL-1RII has been shown to provide beneficial effects in several experimental
disease models. Recombinant IL-1Ra has been approved for the therapy of
rheumatoid arthritis (Kineret, anakinra). Administration of IL-1Ra by local
gene transfer in arthritic joints has been tested experimentally in several
studies, and its therapeutic effects have been confirmed in osteoarthritic
models (Fernandes et al, 1999; Frisbie et al,, 2002). Two clinical trials in RA patients suggested that local
IL-1Ra gene therapy is a feasible and safe option leading to intra-articular
expression of the transferred IL-1Ra gene (Evans et al, 2000a, b).
Using retrovirally delivered DNA coding
for IL-1Ra in knees of rabbit or mouse models of arthritis results in the
previously mentioned contralatral effect. In order to verify that protection of
the contralateral joint could be transferred by cells, Kim and coworkers used ex vivo modified autologous fibroblasts
(Kim et al, 2002). These cells were stably infected to express IL-1Ra, and were
injected intra-articulary into arthritic rabbit knee joints, inhibiting
inflammation and providing chondroprotection in the injected joint as well in
the contralateral site. Thus, local delivery of ex vivo genetically modified non-inflammatory autologous cells is
effective in the therapy of rheumatoid diseases.
However, to achieve a protective effect
the IL-1Ra gene does not require to be injected locally into the joint. In the
mouse model of CIA it has been demonstrated that the i.m. injection of naked
IL-1Ra cDNA is sufficient to ameliorate pathological symptoms (Kim et al, 2003)
and that these effects could be enhanced by in
vivo electroporation of the injected muscle (Jeong et al, 2004).
Interestingly, IL-1Ra concentrations were found to be enhanced in sera and in
the ankle joints of the treated mice, but the levels obtained were lower than
those needed for protective effects in studies with administration of
recombinant IL-1Ra. IL-1b expression was reduced in the ankle joints, suggesting that the
protective mechanism is not directly due to systemic IL-1Ra activity. A
possible mechanism is the transfection of bystander cells which reduce the
inflammatory reaction at distant sites.
Maintaining constantly high levels of
therapeutic agents in arthritic disease has several pharmacological
disadvantages. To optimise treatment protocols, van de Loo and coworkers
constructed in 2004 an adenoviral vector with disease-inducible properties. To
this end, they drove expression of a reporter gene by IL-1/IL-6
enhancer/promoter elements and found the transgene being expressed only under
inflammatory conditions. Such an expression system provides a very interesting
and useful tool for the therapy of diseases with a spontaneous remission and
exacerbation course, like RA or MS.
The signalling chain of the IL-1R complex,
the accessory protein IL-1RAcP, has been identified in human serum in a soluble
form, encompassing the extracellular domain of the membrane receptor. Soluble
IL-1RAcP (sIL-1RAcP) can enhance the binding affinity of the inhibitory
sIL-1RII for IL-1, thereby acting as a negative regulator in the IL-1 system
(Smith et al, 2003). Smeets and coworkers, (2003) used a stably transfected
fibroblast cell line to deliver sIL-1RAcP therapeutically into arthritic joints
of mice with CIA. They found that this treatment ameliorated locally the joint destruction,
but had no systemic effect. Systemic administration of the cDNA coding for
sIL-1RAcP by an adenoviral system achieved an even higher rate of protection.
Thus, sIL-1RAcP gene delivery can be developed for therapeutic usage in chronic
inflammatory/autoimmune pathologies in which IL-1 inhibition is beneficial.
G. Th1 cytokines
and inhibitors: sIFN-gR-Fc, IL-12,
IL-18, IL-18BP
Th1 inflammatory responses have a relevant
role in many autoimmune pathologies. This is shown by correlation of disease severity
with elevated IFN-g levels, by amelioration of the disease upon IFN-g neutralisation, and in mouse models with
targeted deletions of the genes for IFN-g, IFN-g receptor (IFN-gR), IL-12, or Stat4. An efficient trap to
bind circulating IFN-g and thus inhibit its activity is the expression of a fusion
protein composed of the extracellular portion of the IFN-gR fused to the constant part of the heavy
chain of murine IgG1 (IFN-gR-Fc). Interfering with the activity of Th1-associated
cytokines with cDNA treatment is another very promising strategy that is
actively pursued at the experimental level.
In genetically diabetic NOD mice, i.m.
injection of cDNA coding for IFN-gR-Fc fusion protein
protected from insulitis. In this study, administration of the IFN-g-Fc coding vector led to detectable
circulating protein levels (Chang and Prud'homme, 1999). The cDNA coding for
the IFN-gR-Fc fusion protein was used in MRL lpr/lpr mice, a model for human lupus.
In these mice, only i.m. injection followed by in vivo electroporation resulted in consistent expression of the
fusion protein and reduced levels of circulating IFN-g. When delivered in this way, the IFN-gR-Fc DNA ameliorated the disease even when
administered to mice at an advanced stage of disease (4 months) (Lawson et al,
2000). In summary, IFN-g plays a central role in the developmant and maintanance of
several autoimmune diseases and blocking its activity by gene therapy is a
feasible method to ameliorate clinical manifestations.
The expression of IFN-g is tightly regulated. The cytokines IL-12
and IL-18 are the most potent physiological inducers of IFN-g expression. Several studies demonstrate
that blockade of their bioactivities results in reduced IFN-g levels, thus leading to the amelioration
of IFN-g-mediated diseases. So far, a few studies
used in vivo gene transfer to deliver
IL-12 and IL-18 blocking agents.
The IL-12 gene, composed of two cDNAs
coding for the two subunits p35 and p40, has been used experimentally in vivo as a DNA vaccine adjuvant. Intramuscular
administration of the IL-12 cDNA enhanced Th1-like immune responses against the
immunisation antigen (Sin et al, 1999), similarly to what obtained with in vivo delivery of the recombinant
protein. Delivery of the IL-12 gene per
se also resulted in systemic Th1 responses and NK cell activation (Watanabe
et al, 1999). Administration of recombinant IL-12 to autoimmune MRL lpr/lpr mice (whose lupus-like syndrome
is in large part Th1-dependent) enhanced the serum levels of IFN-g and exacerbated pathological symptoms
(Huang et al, 1996). In contrast, i.m. injection of the IL-12 gene ameliorated
the lupus-like disease, despite increased serum levels of IFN-g and increased IgG2a titers (both features
of elevated Th1 reactivity). Injection of DNA coding for the p40 subunit of
IL-12 only (which in homodimeric form acts as an inhibitor of IL-12 activity)
had no effect on the lupus-like symptoms of MRL lpr/lpr mice (Hagiwara et al, 2000). Thus, despite the indication
that IL-12 may indeed participate to the lupus pathology, these contrasting
results indicate the need of an accurate design and validation of any
IL-12-based strategies to be used therapeutically.
IFN-g production and amplification of Th1
responses in autoimmune pathologies involve many factors besides IL-12. One of
the other cytokines involved is IL-18, found at increased levels systemically
and in affected tissues/organs of autoimmune patients as well as in
experimental animal models of autoimmune diseases (Boraschi D and Dinarello C
A, 2005). Due to its potent amplification of Th1 responses, IL-18 gene has been
experimented as adjuvant similarly to the IL-12 gene. Th1-mediated immune
response is induced by i.m injection of an anti-CD3scFv/IL-18 fusion DNA in
antigen (OVA)-primed mice (Kim et al, 2004), thus making this approach suitable
for the therapy of Th2-biased allergic disorders (Salagianni M and Kemeny D M,
2004). The induction of the Th1 immune response is dependent on the IL-18
protein and on the presence of immunostimulating CpG motifs in the DNA
construct (Li et al, 2004).
Inhibition of IL-18 and of its
Th1-stimulating capacity is therefore a strategy that can be pursued for the
therapy of Th1-dependent autoimmune syndromes. The best known natural inhibitor
of IL-18 is the IL-18 binding protein (IL-18BP), a soluble receptor-like
molecule produced in inflammatory conditions to down-regulate excessive
IL-18-dependent inflammation (Dinarello, 2000). The IL-18BPc gene has been
delivered with adenoviral vector to mice suffering from CIA (Smeets et al,
2003a). Intra-articular overexpression of IL-18BP reduced inflammation and bone
and cartilage destruction in the affected joint. Furthermore, administration of
the IL-18BP encoding virus to both knees had distal and systemic protective
effects on CIA. The IgG2a:IgG1 ratio of anti-CII antibodies was shifted towards
IgG1, indicating that blocking IL-18 influenced the Th1/Th2 profile of the
immune reaction occuring in CIA towards Th2 and anti-inflammation.
H. Chemokines:
CCL2/MCP-1
Chemokines, a family of small chemotactic
cytokines, are able to attract immune cells to the site of inflammation. Thus,
they are key mediators in the recruitment of leukocytes into an inflamed organ
(Ward et al, 1998). MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; CCL2 according
to the new nomenclature) belongs to the CC subfamily of chemokines and has an
important role in inflammation. CCL2 is expressed by a variety of leukocytes
and other cell types (vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells,
glomerular mesangial cell, osteoblasts, epithelial cells) upon stimulation with
inflammatory agents (e.g., bacterial
lipopolysaccharide, IL-1). In mesangial cells the synthesis and release of CCL2
is rapidly induced by IgG complexes. IL-1, TNF-a, PDGF, TGF-b and LIF induce the synthesis of CCL2 in
human articular chondrocytes, which may thus play an active role in promoting
monocyte influx and activation in synovial joints. Elevated levels of CCL2 are
observed in macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaques. Beside its chemotactic properties,
CCL2 activates the tumouricidal activity of monocytes and macrophages in vivo and regulates the expression of
proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-6.
In a recent study, the gene for a
N-terminal truncated CCL2 mutant, which acts as a competitive inhibitor by
blocking the interaction of CCL2 with its receptor CCR2, was delivered i.m. by
electroporation in 16 week-old MRL lpr/lpr
mice (which have already developed the spontaneous progressive lupus-like
syndrome that will culminate in fatal kidney failure). Repeated administration
resulted in protection from renal injury, due to reduced leucocytic
infiltration, and in a prolonged lifespan of the mice (Shimizu et al, 2004).
III. Anti-cytokine therapy with gene transfer: cDNA
vaccination
By varying gene delivery systems, dosage
and routes of administration, it is possible to generate a significant immune
response of the host against the gene product encoded by the introduced DNA. A
key feature of cDNA vaccination is the fact that neutralising immune responses
(mostly production of neutralising antibodies) can be generated against self
proteins. Overcoming tolerance to self antigens may be due on one side to the
fact that the majority of experimental evidence has been obtained in autoimmune
mice (where tolerance mechanisms are already compromised). However, significant
production of autoantibodies could be obtained also in immunocompetent mice
(Youssef et al, 2000). Another reason for efficient induction of antibodies
could be the presence in the DNA carrier plasmid of adjuvant sequences (e.g., CpG sequences in bacterial DNA)
which could amplify the immune response against the encoded protein. Also,
protein expression in anomalous cell compartments and tissue locations (e.g., in the muscle instead of lymphoid
organs) may induce uptake of newly synthesized recombinant proteins by
antigen-presenting cells. Although the mechanisms by which cDNA immunisation is
effective are not fully defined, the approach is already in use in experimental
models of autoimmunity. The induction of beneficial autoimmunity against
pathological endogenous cytokines is the primary goal of this vaccination
strategy (Wildbaum et al, 2003). The overall goal is that of achieving
prolonged inhibition of inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis
and/or in the downstream destructive effects of the disease (Karin, 2004). The
drawback of the approach is that cytokine inhibition could eventually results
in defective defence reactions and increased susceptibility to infections
(immunosuppression). A summary of the most relevant experimental results
obtained so far is reported in the Table
2.
A. Chemokines
(chemotactic cytokines)
The in
vivo inhibition of chemokine activity by induction of neutralising
antibodies through cDNA vaccination was studied in great detail by the group of
Nathan Karin. Two animal models of autoimmune syndromes, experimental allergic
encephalomylitis (EAE) and adjuvant-induced arthritis (AA), have been used to
study the pathological involvement of the chemokines CCL3/MIP-1a, CCL2/MCP-1, CCL4/MIP-1b, CCL5/ RANTES, and CXCL10/IP-10. Multiple
injections of chemokine cDNA could induce significant titres of specific
antibodies with neutralising capacity (Youssef et al, 1998, 1999, 2000; Salomon
et al, 2002; Wildbaum et al, 2002). In the rat EAE model, vaccination with
Table 2. DNA
vaccination against cytokines/cytokine receptors in models of autoimmune
diseases
|
Cytokine/Receptor |
Disease Model |
Outcome |
Reference |
|
CCL2/MCP-1 |
EAE, AA |
neutralising antibodies; prevention disease induction; inhibition
full-blown disease (AA) |
Youssef S et al., 1998; Youssef S
et al., 1999; Youssef S et al., 2000 |
|
CCL3/MIP-1a |
EAE, AA |
neutralising antibodies; prevention disease induction; inhibition
full-blown disease (AA) |
Youssef S et al., 1998; Youssef S
et al., 1999; Youssef S et al., 2000 |
|
CCL4/MIP-1b |
EAE |
neutralising antibodies; exacerbation disease induction |
Youssef S et al., 1998 |
|
|
AA |
neutralising antibodies; prevention disease induction; inhibition
full-blown disease |
Youssef S et al., 2000 |
|
CCL5/RANTES |
AA |
neutralising antibodies; prevention disease induction; inhibition
full-blown disease |
Youssef S et al., 2000 |
|
|
EAE |
neutralising antibodies; no effect on disease induction |
Youssef S et al., 1998 |
|
CXCL10/IP-10 |
EAE, AA |
neutralising antibodies; prevention disease induction; inhibition
full-blown disease |
Salomon I et al., 2002; Wildbaum
G et al., 2002 |
|
TNF-a |
EAE, AA, APS |
neutralising antibodies, memory T; resistance to disease induction
(EAE, AA), reduction disease symptoms (AA, APS) |
Blank M et al., 2003; Wildbaum G
et al., 2000; Wildbaum G and Karin N, 1999 |
|
CpG/TLR9 |
Diabetes in NOD mice |
IFN-g, IL-10; inhibition diabetogenic process |
Quintana F J et al., 2000 |
|
|
EAE in rat |
IFN-g; resistance to disease induction |
Boccaccio G L et al., 1999 |
|
|
EAE in SJL mice |
Th1, IL-12; breaking tolerance induced by peptide immunisation, flare-up
disease |
Ichikawa H T et al., 2002 |
|
IL-2Ra (CD25) |
AA |
no antibodies, anti-ergotypic T cell response, IL-10; protection from disease development |
Mimran A et al., 2004 |
|
IL-18 |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
neutralising antibodies; decrease IFN-g, lymphadenopathy, kidney damage; increase life span |
Boss P et al., 2003 |
|
IL-12/IL-18 |
Lupus in MRL lpr/lpr mice |
decrease IFN-g, lymphadenopathy, kidney and lung damage |
Neumann D et al., 2005 |
CCL3/MIP-1a, CCL2/MCP-1, or CXCL10/IP-10 could prevent the disease, even when
EAE was induced two month after vaccination (Youssef et al, 1998, 1999, 2000;
Wildbaum et al, 2002). In addition, vaccination with CXCL10/IP-10 cDNA in the
EAE model was effective also when applied therapeutically in the full-blown
disease (Wildbaum et al, 2002). In contrast, administration of CCL4/MIP-1b cDNA exacerbated the outcome of EAE,
while vaccination with CCL5/RANTES cDNA had no effect (Youssef et al, 1998,
1999). Vaccination in the AA model was effective with all four chemokine cDNAs,
with generation of neutralising antibodies followed by protective immunity and
immunological memory to the vaccine (Salomon et al, 2002; Youssef et al, 2000).
Vaccination could be performed after disease onset, and still inhibited
development and progression of the disease (Youssef et al, 2000; Salomon et al,
2002). The neutralising antibodies induced by the CXCL10/IP-10 cDNA vaccination
could block leukocyte migration and alter the Th1/Th2 balance of autoantigen
(myelin basic protein)-specific T cells towards lower inflammation, and could
adoptively transfer the disease suppressive effect (Salomon et al, 2002).
B. TNF-a
Because of the major involvement of TNF-a in the pathological consequences of
autoimmune chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA, several approaches of
anti-TNF-a therapies have been attempted. Therapies
with neutralising antibodies or engineered soluble receptors have indeed shown
a significant beneficial effect in patients with RA. Thus, vaccination with
TNF-a DNA is being developed as a possibly more
effective approach to inhibition of TNF-a. In an experimental rat EAE model, a high
titer of neutralising antibodies to TNF-a could be induced by immunisation with
TNF-a naked DNA vaccine, in parallel to
resistance to EAE induction. These vaccine-induced antibodies could transfer
resistance to EAE in naive rats (Wildbaum and Karin, 1999). Vaccination with
TNF-a naked DNA vaccine induced immunological
memory and production of anti-TNF-a neutralising antibodies also in BALB/c
mice with experimental anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS; an autoimmune syndrome
often associated with lupus and responsible of recurrent abortions). Anti-TNF-a vaccination early during disease
development could significantly reduce the titres of anti-phospholipid
autoantibodies, consequently decreasing foetal loss and normalising platelet
counts and the prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (one of the
features of APS). Vaccination in mice with already established APS had less
pronounced effects (Blank et al, 2003). In another experimental autoimmune
arthritis model, AA in rats, administration of the TNF-a naked DNA vaccine before induction of the
disease also resulted in the generation of immunological memory and high titers
of neutralising anti-TNF-a antibodies, in parallel to inhibition of disease development.
These antibodies could transfer disease inhibition to non-vaccinated animals.
Vaccination in rats with full-blown disease resulted in block of the disease
with rapid and long-lasting normalisation of the arthritis score (Wildbaum et
al, 2000).
C. TLR9 agonists
Among the receptors of the TLR/IL-1R
family (which include both the receptors for the cytokines IL-1 and IL-18 and
the toll-like receptors TLR responsible for initiation of innate defence), a
particular interest is being devoted to activation of TLR9, a receptor
expressed on the plasma membrane of leukocytes which is triggered by
interaction with unmethylated CpG sequences mainly present in bacterial and
viral DNA.
In cDNA vaccination approaches in which
cytokine gene delivery occurs through inoculation of a bacterial-derived
expression plasmid, the contribution of plasmid-dependent triggering of TLR9 is
evident and should be duly considered.
In diabetic NOD mice, cytokine production
by spleen cells is biased towards Th1 (high IFN-g, low IL-10 in response to the polyclonal
stimulus ConA). However, triggering of TLR9 with CpG oligonucleotides
apparently re-directs the response towards a more anti-inflammatory functional
phenotype (low IFN-g, high IL-10) with the induction of protective IgG2b antibodies
against HSP60 and p277 (Quintana et al, 2000). In the rat EAE model,
administration of CpG-containing non-coding plasmids induced IFN-g production in vivo and potently suppressed the induction of autoimmune
encephalomyelitis (Boccaccio et al, 1999). However, stimulation of TLR9 with
CpG may break tolerance to autoantigens and be responsible of the disease
flare-up in EAE of SJL mice (Ichikawa et al, 2002) and may be a key step in
triggering autoantigen presentation and autoantibody production leading to
autoimmune diseases (Leadbetter et al, 2002; Rui et al, 2003; Viglianti et al,
2003; Darabi et al, 2004; Iliev et al, 2004; Marshak-Rothstein et al, 2004a,b;
Waldner et al, 2004; Wang and Krieg, 2004; Means et al, 2005). Thus, although
the use of CpG-containing plasmids or DNA sequences apparently has a
re-equilibrating effect in altered immune response (being able to shift
excessive Th1 responses towards Th2 and vice-versa), the final outcome may vary
depending on the microenvironmental situation, and TLR9 triggering may be
detrimental, resulting in induction or exacerbation of autoimmunity.
Indeed, TLR triggering (through bacterial
or viral infection, after conventional vaccination, or consequent to traumatic
events) may be among the events promoting loss of tolerance and contributing to
the development of autoimmunity (Toubi and Schoenfeld, 2004). In this view, DNA
vaccination approaches in autoimmune disease should carefully consider the
impact of the vaccine formulation (e.g. the type of plasmid) on the disease
itself.
D. IL-2Ra (CD25)
Antibodies against the IL-2R a chain (CD25) is a therapeutic strategy
used since the mid-1980s to achieve immunosuppression by inhibiting the
activity of the cytokine IL-2, e.g.,
in allograft rejection. Suppression of IL-2 through inhibition of CD25 is being
developed for treating autoimmune syndromes, using a DNA vaccination approach.
Vaccination with cDNA coding for the soluble form of CD25 was performed in rats
before induction of AA. Vaccination with cDNA coding for the soluble form of
CD25 was performed in rats before induction of AA. Vaccination with cDNA coding
for the soluble form of CD25 was performed in rats before induction of AA.
Vaccination completely inhibited disease development and skewed cytokine
production from a Th1 inflammatory profile (high IFN-g, low IL-10) to a Th2 anti-inflammatory
profile (low IFN-g, high IL-10). No antibodies against CD25 were produced, but an
anti-ergotypic (down-regulatory) T cell response was generated against the
activation marker CD25. Indeed, anti-ergotypic T cells could proliferate and
produce IL-10 reacting to the presence of CD25-expressing activated T cells,
and could transfer resistance to disease induction to non-vaccinated rats
(Mimran et al, 2004).
E. IL-18
Vaccination against mature murine IL-18
was performed in young MRL lpr/lpr
mice, i.e., before disease onset
(Boss et al, 2003). Vaccinated mice had significant expression of IL-18 mRNA
in the muscle (inoculation site) and increased circulating IL-18 levels.
Circulating IL-18 was found mostly bound to neutralising antibodies, absent in
non-immunised control mice. Upon repeated vaccination, mice showed a
significant decrease in IFN-g production, lymphadenopathy, kidney inflammation and
damage (including presence of immune complexes) and of consequent proteinuria,
and survived significantly longer that non-vaccinated animals. Despite the decreased
presence of immune complexes (damage by immune complexes is the major cause of
kidney failure and fatal outcome), no decrease of anti-DNA and
anti-phospholipid autoantibodies was evident. This is in agreement with
previous evidence suggesting lack of correlation between autoantibody levels
and renal damage/early death (Yasuda et al, 2001). Indeed, it has been reported
that the increased amount of immune complexes in MRL lpr/lpr kidney does not depend on increased deposition (a
consequence of increased autoantibody levels) but rather to decreased clearance
(Cruse et al, 2000).
On the basis of these results of
anti-IL-18 vaccination, and following the notion that IL-12 acts in synergy
with IL-12 in inducing Th1 inflammatory responses and has a central role in
several autoimmune syndromes, another study was carried out in MRL lpr/lpr mice, by vaccinating animals
with cDNA of both IL-12 and IL-18 (Neumann et al, 2005). Concomitant
administration of cDNA coding for the two cytokines induced a potent inhibition
of lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly (the most striking characteristics of the
disease), and reduced almost to zero the kidney damage and proteinuria. In
addition, the strong inflammatory infiltrate evident in lungs of lpr/lpr mice was absent in IL-18/IL-12
vaccinated animals.
IV. Conclusions and perspectives
Therapy of chronic, life-long pathologies
such as autoimmune diseases is a crucial issue that is being addressed from
different viewpoints. The chronic pathology depends on immune tolerance breaks
that trigger a misdirected inflammatory and immune reaction against
self-antigens, a reaction that includes a number of inflammatory cytokines and
chemokines. A radical therapy of autoimmunity, which could reconduct the immune
response to correct recognition, is still far from reality. Current therapies
are therefore directed at inhibiting the pathological effects of the
misdirected immune response with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive
strategies. Anti-cytokine drugs, in particular recombinant cytokine inhibitors
like soluble receptors for TNF and IL-1, are being tested in clinical
situations with good results. However, the chronicity of disease implies that
drugs, to be effective, are administered repeatedly and continuously, with
consequent side effects of toxicity, loss of efficacy, triggering of
neutralising antibodies.
On these grounds, autoimmune diseases are
ideal candidates for gene-based therapies, where stable delivery of genes
encoding therapeutic cytokines/cytokine inhibitors could ensure long-lasting
release of the beneficial molecule. Likewise, gene-based vaccination against
pathogenic endogenous cytokines could provide long-lasting neutralisation of
the exceeding cytokine. Data collected within a large body of studies in
different experimental animal models suggest that the hypothesis of cytokine
gene transfer in autoimmunity is a feasible option which should achieve
long-term efficacy in the absence of the collateral effects caused by
recombinant drugs. However, it is clear that the vector used for delivery and
the route and modalities of DNA administration are crucial for the successful
outcome of the therapy. In addition, careful analysis of possible long-term
consequences of the treatment is necessary, in order to avoid the risk of iatrogenic
immunosuppression and imbalanced immunoregulation.
Acknowledgements
DN is supported by a grant of the Hannover
Medical School (MHH HiLF). DB is supported by the Commission of the European
Union (contract no. QLK4-2001-00147); by AIRC (Associazione Italiana Ricerca
sul Cancro), Milano, Italy; and by the FIRB project NIRAM of the Italian
Ministry of Instruction, University and Research.
Aihara H and
Miyazaki J (1998) Gene transfer into
muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat
Biotechnol 16, 867-870.
Barry MA and
Johnston SA (1997) Biological
features of genetic immunization. Vaccine
15, 788-791.
Blank M, Krause
I, Wildbaum G, Karin N and Shoenfeld Y (2003)
TNFa DNA vaccination
prevents clinical manifestations of experimental antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 12, 546-549.
Bloquel C, Bessis
N, Boissier M C, Scherman D and Bigey P (2004)
Gene therapy of collagen-induced arthritis by electrotransfer of human
tumor necrosis factor-a soluble receptor
I variants. Hum Gene Ther 15,
189-201.
Boccaccio GL, Mor
F and Steinman L (1999) Non-coding
plasmid DNA induces IFN-g in vivo and
suppresses autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int
Immunol 11, 289-296.
Boraschi D and
Dinarello CA (2005) IL-18 in
autoimmunity. Eur Cytokine Netw 16,
in press.
Boss P, Neumann
D, Del Giudice E, Ciaramella A, Gloaguen I, Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA, Di Carlo
E, Musiani P, Meroni PL, Caselli G, Ruggiero P and Boraschi D (2003) IL-18 cDNA vaccination protects
mice from spontaneous lupus-like autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 14181-14186.
Burls A and
Jobanputra P (2004) The trials of
anakinra. Lancet 364, 827-828.
Cameron MJ,
Arreaza GA, Waldhauser L, Gauldie J and Delovitch TL (2000) Immunotherapy of spontaneous type 1 diabetes in nonobese
diabetic mice by systemic interleukin-4 treatment employing adenovirus
vector-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther
7, 1840-1846.
Chang Y and
Prud'homme G J (1999) Intramuscular
administration of expression plasmids encoding IFN-g receptor/IgG1 or
IL-4/IgG1 chimeric proteins protects from autoimmuity. J Gene Med 1, 415-423.
Charles P,
Elliott MJ, Davis D, Potter A, Kalden JR, Antoni C, Breedveld FC, Smolen JS,
Eberl G, deWoody K, Feldmann M and Maini RN (1999) Regulation of cytokines, cytokine inhibitors and acute-phase
proteins following anti-TNF-a therapy in
rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol 163,
1521-1528.
Chesnoy S, Lee PY
and Huang L (2003) Intradermal
injection of transforming growth factor-b1 gene enhances
wound healing in genetically diabetic mice. Pharm Res 20, 345-350.
Croxford JL,
Triantaphyllopoulos K, Podhajcer OL, Feldmann M, Baker D and Chernajovsky Y (1998) Cytokine gene therapy in
experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by injection of plasmid DNA-cationic
liposome complex into the central nervous system. J Immunol 160, 5181-5187.
Cruse JM, Lewis
RE and Dilioglou S (2000) Fate of
immune complexes, glomerulonephritis and cell-mediated vasculitis in
lupus-prone MRL/Mp lpr/lpr mice. Exp Mol Pathol 69, 211-222.
Darabi K, Karulin
AY, Boehm BO, Hofstetter HH, Fabry Z, LaManna JC, Chavez JC, Tary-Lehmann M and
Lehmann PV (2004) The third signal
in T cell-mediated autoimmune disease? J
Immunol 173, 92-99.
Davis HL, Whalen
RG and Demeneix BA (1993) Direct
gene transfer into skeletal muscle in vivo: factors affecting efficiency of
transfer and stability of expression. Hum
Gene Ther 4, 151-159.
de Kozak Y,
Thillaye-Goldenberg B, Naud MC, Da Costa AV, Auriault C and Verwaerde C (2002) Inhibition of experimental
autoimmune uveoretinitis by systemic and subconjunctival adenovirus-mediated
transfer of the viral IL-10 gene. Clin
Exp Immunol 130, 212-223.
Dinarello CA (2000) Targeting interleukin 18 with
interleukin 18 binding protein. Ann
Rheum Dis 59 Suppl 1, 17-20.
Dinarello CA (2003) Setting the cytokine trap for
autoimmunity. Nat Med 9, 20-22.
Economides AN,
Carpenter LR, Rudge JS, Wong V, Koehler-Stec EM, Hartnett C, Pyles EA, Xu X,
Daly TJ, Young MR, Fandl JP, Lee F, Carver S, McNay J, Bailey K, Ramakanth S,
Hutabarat R, Huang TT, Radziejewski C, Yancopoulos GD and Stahl N (2003) Cytokine traps: multi-component,
high-affinity blockers of cytokine action. Nat
Med 9, 47-52.
Edelstein ML,
Abedi MR, Wixon J and Edelstein RM (2004)
Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide 1989-2004-an overview. J Gene Med 6, 597-602.
Evans CH,
Ghivizzani SC, Herndon JH, Wasko MC, Reinecke J, Wehling P and Robbins PD (2000a) Clinical trials in the gene
therapy of arthritis. Clin Orthop S300-S307.
Evans CH,
Ghivizzani SC, Oligino TJ and Robbins PD (2000b)
Gene therapy for autoimmune disorders. J
Clin Immunol 20, 334-346.
Feltquate DM,
Heaney S, Webster RG and Robinson HL (1997)
Different T helper cell types and antibody isotypes generated by saline and
gene gun DNA immunization. J Immunol 158,
2278-2284.
Fernandes J,
Tardif G, Martel-Pelletier J, Lascau-Coman V, Dupuis M, Moldovan F, Sheppard M,
Krishnan BR and Pelletier JP (1999) In
vivo transfer of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene in osteoarthritic
rabbit knee joints: prevention of osteoarthritis progression. Am J Pathol 154, 1159-1169.
Fortuin FD, Vale
P, Losordo DW, Symes J, DeLaria GA, Tyner JJ, Schaer GL, March R, Snell RJ,
Henry TD, Van Camp J, Lopez JJ, Richenbacher W, Isner JM and Schatz RA (2003) One-year follow-up of direct
myocardial gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor-2 using naked
plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by way of thoracotomy in no-option patients. Am J Cardiol 92, 436-439.
Frisbie DD,
Ghivizzani SC, Robbins PD, Evans CH and McIlwraith CW (2002) Treatment of experimental equine osteoarthritis by in vivo
delivery of the equine interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene. Gene Ther 9, 12-20.
Furst DE, Schiff
MH, Fleischmann RM, Strand V, Birbara CA, Compagnone D, Fischkoff SA and
Chartash EK (2003) Adalimumab, a
fully human anti tumor necrosis factor-a monoclonal
antibody and concomitant standard antirheumatic therapy for the treatment of
rheumatoid arthritis: results of STAR (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid
Arthritis). J Rheumatol 30,
2563-2571.
Goudy K, Song S,
Wasserfall C, Zhang YC, Kapturczak M, Muir A, Powers M, Scott-Jorgensen M,
Campbell-Thompson M, Crawford JM, Ellis TM, Flotte TR and Atkinson MA (2001) Adeno-associated virus
vector-mediated IL-10 gene delivery prevents type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 13913-13918.
Goudy KS,
Burkhardt BR, Wasserfall C, Song S, Campbell-Thompson ML, Brusko T, Powers MA,
Clare-Salzler MJ, Sobel ES, Ellis TM, Flotte TR and Atkinson MA (2003) Systemic overexpression of IL-10
induces CD4+CD25+ cell populations in vivo and ameliorates type 1 diabetes in
nonobese diabetic mice in a dose-dependent fashion. J Immunol 171, 2270-2278.
Hacein-Bey-Abina
S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, Le Deist F, Wulffraat N, McIntyre E, Radford I,
Villeval JL, Fraser CC, Cavazzana-Calvo M and Fischer A (2003a) A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for
X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N
Engl J Med 348, 255-256.
Hacein-Bey-Abina
S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, Lim A,
Osborne CS, Pawliuk R, Morillon E, Sorensen R, Forster A, Fraser P, Cohen J I,
de Saint Basile G, Alexander I, Wintergerst U, Frebourg T, Aurias A,
Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Romana S, Radford-Weiss I, Gross F, Valensi F, Delabesse E,
Macintyre E, Sigaux F, Soulier J, Leiva L E, Wissler M, Prinz C, Rabbitts TH,
Le Deist F, Fischer A and Cavazzana-Calvo M (2003b) LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients
after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 302,
415-419.
Hagiwara E, Okubo
T, Aoki I, Ohno S, Tsuji T, Ihata A, Ueda A, Shirai A, Okuda K, Miyazaki J and
Ishigatsubo Y (2000) IL-12-encoding
plasmid has a beneficial effect on spontaneous autoimmune disease in MRL/MP-lpr/lpr mice. Cytokine 12, 1035-1041.
Higuchi N,
Maruyama H, Kuroda T, Kameda S, Iino N, Kawachi H, Nishikawa Y, Hanawa H,
Tahara H, Miyazaki J and Gejyo F (2003) Hydrodynamics-based
delivery of the viral interleukin-10 gene suppresses experimental crescentic
glomerulonephritis in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Gene
Ther 10, 1297-1310.
Huang FP, Feng
GJ, Lindop G, Stott DI and Liew FY (1996)
The role of interleukin 12 and nitric oxide in the development of
spontaneous autoimmune disease in MRL/MP-lpr/lpr
mice. J Exp Med 183, 1447-1459.
Ichikawa HT,
Williams LP and Segal BM (2002) Activation
of APCs through CD40 or Toll-like receptor 9 overcomes tolerance and
precipitates autoimmune disease. J
Immunol 169, 2781-2787.
Iliev AI,
Stringaris AK, Nau R and Neumann H (2004)
Neuronal injury mediated via stimulation of microglial toll-like receptor-9
(TLR9). FASEB J 18, 412-414.
Ito K, Ito K,
Shinohara N and Kato S (2003) DNA
immunization via intramuscular and intradermal routes using a gene gun provides
different magnitudes and durations on immune response. Mol Immunol 39, 847-854.
Jeong JG, Kim JM,
Ho SH, Hahn W, Yu SS and Kim S (2004) Electrotransfer
of human IL-1Ra into skeletal muscles reduces the incidence of murine
collagen-induced arthritis. J Gene Med 6,
1125-1133.
Karin N (2004) Induction of protective therapy
for autoimmune diseases by targeted DNA vaccines encoding pro-inflammatory
cytokines and chemokines. Curr Opin Mol
Ther 6, 27-33.
Kim EJ, Cho D and
Kim TS (2004) Efficient induction of
T helper type 1-mediated immune responses in antigen-primed mice by anti-CD3
single-chain Fv/interleukin-18 fusion DNA. Immunology
111, 27-34.
Kim JM, Jeong JG,
Ho SH, Hahn W, Park EJ, Kim S, Yu SS, Lee YW and Kim S (2003) Protection against collagen-induced arthritis by
intramuscular gene therapy with an expression plasmid for the interleukin-1
receptor antagonist. Gene Ther 10,
1543-1550.
Kim SH, Lechman
ER, Kim S, Nash J, Oligino TJ and Robbins PD (2002) Ex vivo gene delivery of IL-1Ra and soluble TNF receptor
confers a distal synergistic therapeutic effect in antigen-induced arthritis. Mol Ther 6, 591-600.
Ko KS, Lee M, Koh
JJ and Kim SW (2001) Combined
administration of plasmids encoding IL-4 and IL-10 prevents the development of
autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Mol Ther 4, 313-316.
Koh JJ, Ko KS,
Lee M, Han S, Park JS and Kim SW (2000) Degradable
polymeric carrier for the delivery of IL-10 plasmid DNA to prevent autoimmune
insulitis of NOD mice. Gene Ther 7,
2099-2104.
Kollewe C,
Neumann D and Martin MU (2000) The
first two N-terminal immunoglobulin-like domains of soluble human IL-1 receptor
type II are sufficient to bind and neutralize IL-1b. FEBS Lett 487, 189-193.
La Cava A, Billetta
R, Gaietta G, Bonnin DB, Baird SM and Albani S (2000) Cell-mediated DNA transport between distant inflammatory
sites following intradermal DNA immunization in the presence of adjuvant. J Immunol 164, 1340-1345.
Lang D, Knop J,
Wesche H, Raffetseder U, Kurrle R, Boraschi D and Martin MU (1998) The type II IL-1 receptor
interacts with the IL-1 receptor accessory protein: a novel mechanism of
regulation of IL-1 responsiveness. J
Immunol 161, 6871-6877.
Lawson BR,
Prud'homme GJ, Chang Y, Gardner HA, Kuan J, Kono DH and Theofilopoulos AN (2000) Treatment of murine lupus with
cDNA encoding IFN-gammaR/Fc. J Clin
Invest 106, 207-215.
Leadbetter EA,
Rifkin IR, Hohlbaum AM, Beaudette BC, Shlomchik MJ and Marshak-Rothstein A (2002) Chromatin-IgG complexes activate
B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature 416, 603-607.
Lechman ER,
Jaffurs D, Ghivizzani SC, Gambotto A, Kovesdi I, Mi Z, Evans C H and Robbins PD
(1999) Direct adenoviral gene
transfer of viral IL-10 to rabbit knees with experimental arthritis ameliorates
disease in both injected and contralateral control knees. J Immunol 163, 2202-2208.
Lechman ER,
Keravala A, Nash J, Kim SH, Mi Z and Robbins PD (2003) The contralateral effect conferred by intra-articular
adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of viral IL-10 is specific to the immunizing
antigen. Gene Ther 10, 2029-2035.
Li Y, Ishii K,
Hisaeda H, Hamano S, Zhang M, Nakanishi K, Yoshimoto T, Hemmi H, Takeda K,
Akira S, Iwakura Y and Himeno K (2004) IL-18
gene therapy develops Th1-type immune responses in Leishmania major-infected
BALB/c mice: is the effect mediated by the CpG signaling TLR9? Gene Ther 11, 941-948.
Lindsay J, Van
Montfrans C, Brennan F, Van Deventer S, Drillenburg P, Hodgson H, Te Velde A
and Sol Rodriguez Pena M (2002) IL-10
gene therapy prevents TNBS-induced colitis. Gene Ther 9, 1715-1721.
Lindsay JO,
Ciesielski CJ, Scheinin T, Hodgson HJ and Brennan FM (2001) The prevention and treatment of murine colitis using gene
therapy with adenoviral vectors encoding IL-10. J Immunol 166, 7625-7633.
Losordo DW, Vale
PR, Hendel RC, Milliken CE, Fortuin FD, Cummings N, Schatz RA, Asahara T, Isner
JM and Kuntz RE (2002) Phase 1/2
placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalating trial of myocardial vascular
endothelial growth factor 2 gene transfer by catheter delivery in patients with
chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation
105, 2012-2018.
Lyseng-Williamson
KA and Plosker GL (2004) Etanercept:
a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 22, 1071-1095.
MacColl G, Bunn
C, Goldspink G, Bouloux P and Gorecki DC (2001)
Intramuscular plasmid DNA injection can accelerate autoimmune responses. Gene Ther 8, 1354-1356.
Marshak-Rothstein
A, Busconi L, Lau M, Tabor A S, Leadbetter EA, Akira S, Krieg A M, Lipford GB,
Viglianti GA and Rifkin IR (2004a) Comparison
of CpG s-ODNs, chromatin immune complexes and dsDNA fragment immune complexes
in the TLR9-dependent activation of rheumatoid factor B cells. J Endotoxin Res 10, 247-251.
Marshak-Rothstein
A, Busconi L, Rifkin IR and Viglianti GA (2004b)
The stimulation of Toll-like receptors by nuclear antigens: a link between
apoptosis and autoimmunity. Rheum Dis
Clin North Am 30, 559-74, ix.
Means TK, Latz E,
Hayashi F, Murali MR, Golenbock DT and Luster AD (2005) Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through
cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J
Clin.Invest 115, 407-417.
Miagkov AV,
Varley AW, Munford RS and Makarov SS (2002)
Endogenous regulation of a therapeutic transgene restores homeostasis in
arthritic joints. J Clin Invest 109,
1223-1229.
Mimran A, Mor F,
Carmi P, Quintana FJ, Rotter V and Cohen IR (2004) DNA vaccination with CD25 protects rats from adjuvant
arthritis and induces an antiergotypic response. J Clin Invest 113, 924-932.
Morel PA, Falkner
D, Plowey J, Larregina AT and Falo Jr LD (2004)
DNA immunisation: altering the cellular localisation of expressed protein
and the immunisation route allows manipulation of the immune response. Vaccine 22, 447-456.
Morita Y, Yang J,
Gupta R, Shimizu K, Shelden EA, Endres J, Mule JJ, McDonagh KT and Fox DA (2001) Dendritic cells genetically
engineered to express IL-4 inhibit murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Clin Invest 107, 1275-1284.
Mukherjee P, Wu
B, Mayton L, Kim SH, Robbins PD and Wooley PH (2003) TNF receptor gene therapy results in suppression of IgG2a
anticollagen antibody in collagen induced arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62, 707-714.
Nakajima A,
Seroogy CM, Sandora MR, Tarner IH, Costa GL, Taylor-Edwards C, Bachmann MH,
Contag CH and Fathman CG (2001) Antigen-specific
T cell-mediated gene therapy in collagen-induced arthritis. J Clin Invest 107, 1293-1301.
Neumann D,
Kollewe C, Martin MU and Boraschi D (2000)
The membrane form of the type II IL-1 receptor accounts for inhibitory
function. J Immunol 165, 3350-3357.
Neumann D,
Tschernig T, Popa D, Schmeidl A, de Lema GP, Resch K and Martin MU (2005) Intramuscular administration of
plasmids encoding IL-12 and IL-18 synergistically ameliorate the autoimmune
pathology of MRL/Mp lpr/lpr mice.
Submitted for publication.
Nishihara K,
Miyatake S, Sakata T, Yamashita J, Kikuchi H, Kawade Y, Zu Y, Namba Y, Hanaoka
M and Watanabe Y (1988) Augmentation
of tumor targeting in a line of glioma-specific mouse cytotoxic T-lymphocytes
by retroviral expression of mouse gamma-interferon complementary DNA. Cancer Res 48, 4730-4735.
Nitta Y, Tashiro
F, Tokui M, Shimada A, Takei I, Tabayashi K and Miyazaki J (1998) Systemic delivery of interleukin 10 by intramuscular
injection of expression plasmid DNA prevents autoimmune diabetes in nonobese
diabetic mice. Hum Gene Ther 9,
1701-1707.
Pertmer TM,
Eisenbraun MD, McCabe D, Prayaga SK, Fuller DH and Haynes JR (1995) Gene gun-based nucleic acid
immunization: elicitation of humoral and cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses
following epidermal delivery of nanogram quantities of DNA. Vaccine 13, 1427-1430.
Piccirillo CA,
Chang Y and Prud'homme GJ (1998) TGF-b1 somatic gene
therapy prevents autoimmune disease in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol 161, 3950-3956.
Piccirillo CA and
Prud'homme GJ (2003) Immune
modulation by plasmid DNA-mediated cytokine gene transfer. Curr Pharm Des 9, 83-94.
Quintana FJ,
Rotem A, Carmi P and Cohen IR (2000) Vaccination
with empty plasmid DNA or CpG oligonucleotide inhibits diabetes in nonobese
diabetic mice: modulation of spontaneous 60-kDa heat shock protein
autoimmunity. J Immunol 165,
6148-6155.
Rabinovich GA,
Daly G, Dreja H, Tailor H, Riera CM, Hirabayashi J and Chernajovsky Y (1999) Recombinant galectin-1 and its
genetic delivery suppress collagen-induced arthritis via T cell apoptosis. J Exp Med 190, 385-398.
Raper SE,
Chirmule N, Lee S, Wivel NA, Bagg
A, Gao GP, Wilson JM and Batshaw ML (2003)
Fatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome in a ornithine
transcarbamylase deficient patient following adenoviral gene transfer. Mol Genet Metab 80, 148-158.
Raz E, Dudler J,
Lotz M, Baird SM, Berry CC, Eisenberg RA and Carson DA (1995) Modulation of disease activity in murine systemic lupus
erythematosus by cytokine gene delivery. Lupus
4, 286-292.
Raz E, Watanabe
A, Baird SM, Eisenberg RA, Parr TB, Lotz M, Kipps TJ and Carson DA (1993) Systemic immunological effects
of cytokine genes injected into skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 4523-4527.
Rosenberg SA,
Aebersold P, Cornetta K, Kasid A, Morgan RA, Moen R, Karson EM, Lotze MT, Yang
JC, Topalian SL, et al. (1990) Gene transfer into
humans-immunotherapy of patients with advanced melanoma, using
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes modified by retroviral gene transduction. N Engl J Med 323, 570-578.
Rui L, Vinuesa
CG, Blasioli J and Goodnow CC (2003) Resistance
to CpG DNA-induced autoimmunity through tolerogenic B cell antigen receptor ERK
signaling. Nat Immunol 4, 594-600.
Salagianni M and
Kemeny DM (2004) Anti-CD3 sFv/IL-18
fusion DNA for allergy therapy. Immunology
111, 16-18.
Salomon I, Netzer
N, Wildbaum G, Schif-Zuck S, Maor G and Karin N (2002) Targeting the function of IFN-g-inducible
protein 10 suppresses ongoing adjuvant arthritis. J Immunol 169, 2685-2693.
Shimizu S,
Nakashima H, Masutani K, Inoue Y, Miyake K, Akahoshi M, Tanaka Y, Egashira K,
Hirakata H, Otsuka T and Harada M (2004)
Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates nephritis
in MRL/lpr mice. Rheumatology (Oxford)
Sin JI, Kim JJ,
Arnold RL, Shroff KE, McCallus D, Pachuk C, McElhiney SP, Wolf MW, Pompa-de
Bruin SJ, Higgins TJ, Ciccarelli RB and Weiner DB (1999) IL-12 gene as a DNA vaccine adjuvant in a herpes mouse
model: IL-12 enhances Th1-type CD4+ T cell-mediated protective immunity against
herpes simplex virus-2 challenge. J Immunol
162, 2912-2921.
Smeets RL, van De
Loo FA, Arntz OJ, Bennink MB, Joosten LA and van Den Berg WB (2003a) Adenoviral delivery of IL-18
binding protein C ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Gene Ther 10, 1004-1011.
Smeets RL, van De
Loo FA, Joosten LA, Arntz OJ, Bennink MB, Loesberg WA, Dmitriev IP, Curiel DT,
Martin MU and van Den Berg WB (2003b) Effectiveness
of the soluble form of the interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein as an
inhibitor of interleukin-1 in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48, 2949-2958.
Smith DE, Hanna
R, Friend D, Moore H, Chen H, Farese AM, MacVittie TJ, Virca GD and Sims JE (2003) The soluble form of IL-1
receptor accessory protein enhances the ability of soluble type II IL-1
receptor to inhibit IL-1 action. Immunity
18, 87-96.
Song XY, Gu M,
Jin WW, Klinman DM and Wahl SM (1998) Plasmid
DNA encoding transforming growth factor-b1 suppresses
chronic disease in a streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis model. J Clin Invest 101, 2615-2621.
Suarez-Pinzon WL,
Marcoux Y, Ghahary A and Rabinovitch A (2002)
Gene transfection and expression of transforming growth factor-b1 in nonobese
diabetic mouse islets protects-b-cells in
syngeneic islet grafts from autoimmune destruction. Cell Transplant 11, 519-528.
Taniyama Y, Tachibana
K, Hiraoka K, Aoki M, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Ogihara T, Kaneda Y
and Morishita R (2002) Development
of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound:
enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle.
Gene Ther 9, 372-380.
Torres CA,
Iwasaki A, Barber B H and Robinson HL (1997)
Differential dependence on target site tissue for gene gun and
intramuscular DNA immunizations. J
Immunol 158, 4529-4532.
Toubi E and
Schoenfeld Y (2004) Toll-like
receptors and their role in the development of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity 37, 183-188.
Toussirot E and
Wendling D (2004) The use of TNF-a blocking agents
in rheumatoid arthritis: an overview. Expert
Opin Pharmacother 5, 581-594.
van De Loo FA, de
Hooge AS, Smeets RL, Bakker AC, Bennink MB, Arntz OJ, Joosten LA, van Beuningen
HM, van der Kraan PK, Varley AW and van Den Berg WB (2004) An inflammation-inducible adenoviral expression system for
local treatment of the arthritic joint. Gene
Ther 11, 581-590.
Verwaerde C, Naud
MC, Delanoye A, Wood M, Thillaye-Goldenberg B, Auriault C and de Kozak Y (2003) Ocular transfer of retinal glial
cells transduced ex vivo with adenovirus expressing viral IL-10 or CTLA4-Ig
inhibits experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Gene Ther 10, 1970-1981.
Viglianti GA, Lau
CM, Hanley TM, Miko BA, Shlomchik MJ and Marshak-Rothstein A (2003) Activation of autoreactive B
cells by CpG dsDNA. Immunity 19,
837-847.
Vitadello M,
Schiaffino MV, Picard A, Scarpa M and Schiaffino S (1994) Gene transfer in regenerating muscle. Hum Gene Ther 5, 11-18.
Waldner H,
Collins M and Kuchroo VK (2004) Activation
of antigen-presenting cells by microbial products breaks self tolerance and
induces autoimmune disease. J Clin
Invest 113, 990-997.
Wang Y and Krieg
AM (2004) Induction of autoantibody
production but not autoimmune disease in HEL transgenic mice vaccinated with
HEL in combination with CpG or control oligodeoxynucleotides. Vaccine 22, 2641-2650.
Ward SG, Bacon K
and Westwick J (1998) Chemokines and
T lymphocytes: more than an attraction. Immunity
9, 1-11.
Watanabe M,
Fenton R G, Wigginton J M, McCormick KL, Volker KM, Fogler WE, Roessler PG and
Wiltrout RH (1999) Intradermal
delivery of IL-12 naked DNA induces systemic NK cell activation and Th1
response in vivo that is independent of endogenous IL-12 production. J Immunol163, 1943-1950.
Wells DJ (1993) Improved gene transfer by direct
plasmid injection associated with regeneration in mouse skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett 332, 179-182.
Wells DJ (2004) Gene therapy progress and
prospects: electroporation and other physical methods. Gene Ther 11, 1363-1369.
Wesche H, Korherr
C, Kracht M, Falk W, Resch K and Martin MU (1997)
The interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) is essential for
IL-1-induced activation of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) and
stress-activated protein kinases (SAP kinases). J Biol Chem 272, 7727-7731.
Whalen JD,
Lechman EL, Carlos CA, Weiss K, Kovesdi I, Glorioso JC, Robbins PD and Evans CH
(1999) Adenoviral transfer of the
viral IL-10 gene periarticularly to mouse paws suppresses development of
collagen-induced arthritis in both injected and uninjected paws. J Immunol 162, 3625-3632.
Whalen JD,
Thomson AW, Lu L, Robbins PD and Evans CH (2001)
Viral IL-10 gene transfer inhibits DTH responses to soluble antigens:
evidence for involvement of genetically modified dendritic cells and
macrophages. Mol Ther 4, 543-550.
Wildbaum G and
Karin N (1999) Augmentation of
natural immunity to a pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-a) by targeted DNA
vaccine confers long-lasting resistance to experimental autoimmune
encephalomyelitis. Gene Ther 6,
1128-1138.
Wildbaum G, Nahir
MA and Karin N (2003) Beneficial
autoimmunity to proinflammatory mediators restrains the consequences of self-destructive
immunity. Immunity 19, 679-688.
Wildbaum G,
Netzer N and Karin N (2002) Plasmid
DNA encoding IFN-g-inducible
protein 10 redirects antigen-specific T cell polarization and suppresses
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J
Immunol 168, 5885-5892.
Wildbaum G,
Youssef S and Karin N (2000) A
targeted DNA vaccine augments the natural immune response to self TNF-a and suppresses
ongoing adjuvant arthritis. J Immunol 165,
5860-5866.
Winegar RA,
Monforte JA, Suing KD, O'Loughlin KG, Rudd CJ and Macgregor JT (1996) Determination of tissue
distribution of an intramuscular plasmid vaccine using PCR and in situ DNA
hybridization. Hum Gene Ther 7,
2185-2194.
Yang Z, Chen M,
Wu R, Fialkow LB, Bromberg JS, McDuffie M, Naji A and Nadler JL (2002) Suppression of autoimmune
diabetes by viral IL-10 gene transfer. J
Immunol 168, 6479-6485.
Yasuda T,
Yoshimoto T, Tsubura A and Matsuzawa A (2001)
Clear suppression of Th1 responses but marginal amelioration of autoimmune
manifestations by IL-12p40 transgene in MRL-FAS(lprcg)/FAS(lprcg) mice. Cell Immunol 210, 77-86.
Youssef S, Maor
G, Wildbaum G, Grabie N, Gour-Lavie A and Karin N (2000) C-C chemokine-encoding DNA vaccines enhance breakdown of
tolerance to their gene products and treat ongoing adjuvant arthritis. J Clin Invest 106, 361-371.
Youssef S,
Wildbaum G and Karin N (1999) Prevention
of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by MIP-1a and MCP-1 naked
DNA vaccines. J Autoimmun 13, 21-29.
Youssef S,
Wildbaum G, Maor G, Lanir N, Gour-Lavie A, Grabie N and Karin N (1998) Long-lasting protective immunity
to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis following vaccination with naked
DNA encoding C-C chemokines. J Immunol 161,
3870-3879.
Zhang YC, Pileggi
A, Agarwal A, Molano RD, Powers M, Brusko T, Wasserfall C, Goudy K, Zahr E,
Poggioli R, Scott-Jorgensen M, Campbell-Thompson M, Crawford JM, Nick H, Flotte
T, Ellis TM, Ricordi C, Inverardi L and Atkinson MA (2003) Adeno-associated virus-mediated IL-10 gene therapy inhibits
diabetes recurrence in syngeneic islet cell transplantation of NOD mice. Diabetes 52, 708-716.
Zhibao M,
Ghivizzani SC, Lechman E, Glorioso JC, Evans CH and Robbins PD (2004) Adverse effects of
adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of human transforming growth factor-b 1 into rabbit
knees. Arthirtis Res Ther 5,
R132-R139.

Detlef Neumann Diana
Boraschi